Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology (한국군사과학기술학회지)

The Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology (한국군사과학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Time Performance of Intercept System for Engagement Plan of Missile Defense System

미사일방어체계의 교전계획 수립을 위한 요격체계의 시간성능인자 분석

  • Hong, Seong-Wan (Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Song, Jin-Young (Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Chang, Young-Keun (School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University)
  • 홍승완 (한국항공대학교 대학원 항공우주 및 기계공학과) ;
  • 송진영 (한국항공대학교 대학원 항공우주 및 기계공학과) ;
  • 장영근 (한국항공대학교 항공우주 및 기계공학부)
  • Received : 2018.10.02
  • Accepted : 2019.01.09
  • Published : 2019.02.05
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to establish an effective engagement plan of the missile defense system, both spatial and temporal performance analysis of the intercept system should be performed. However, research on existing missile defense systems has been mainly focused on spatial performance. In this study, time performance factors are defined through the composition and operational concept of missile defense system, and the target ballistic missile interception process is presented as integrated timeline through ballistic missile model and radar model. We also proposed an algorithm for deriving time performance. Simulation results confirm that the time performance factors can be used in the engagement planning for multi-engagement through the example of engagement planning.

Keywords

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Missile defense network flow

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Radar detection area

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Intercept sequence

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Intercept sequence timeline

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Timeline analysis algorithm flow chart

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Pseudo-code of timeline analysis algorithm

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Simulation scenario

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Timeline of intercept sequence

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Timeline of intercept sequence with SLS, SSL firing policy

Table 1. Time performance factor

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Input parameters for trajectory calculation

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Missile defense effectiveness factor

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Target input parameters

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Missile defense system network parameters

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Intercept systems input parameters

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Time performance factor analysis results

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Engagement plan example

GSGGBW_2019_v22n1_93_t0008.png 이미지

References

  1. J. Jang, K. Kim, B. Choi and J. Suh, "A Linear Approximation Model for an Asset-based Weapon Target Assignment Problem," Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 108-116, 2015. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2015.38.3.108
  2. Y. Jeong and J. Lee, "Footprint of Ballistic Missile Defence System," Proceeding of the 2014 KSAS Fall Conference, pp. 960-963, Nov. 2014.
  3. Manne. A. S, "A Target-Assignment Problem," Operations Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 346-351, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.6.3.346
  4. J. Chen, B. Xin, Z. H. Peng, L. H. Dou, and J. Zhang, "Evolutionary Decision-Makings for the Dynamic Weapon-Target Assignment Problem," Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 2006-2018, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-009-0190-x
  5. C. Liu, H. Wang, and Z. Qiu, "An Adaptive Memetic Algorithm Solving Dynamic Weapon Target Assignment Problem," IEEE International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science, pp. 1-4, Dec. 2010.
  6. D. Lee, "The Optimal Allocation and Engagement Scheduling of Interceptor Missiles for Ballistic Missile Defense," Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Seoul, Seoul, 2016.
  7. NATO, "Patriot Deployment," NATO, Belgium, 2015.
  8. H. Yingbo and Q. Yong, "THAAD-Like High Altitude Theater Missile Defense: Strategic Defense Capability and Certain Countermeasures Analysis," Science and Global Security, Vol. 11, No. 2-3, pp. 151-202, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/714041034
  9. Missile Defense Agency, "Ballistic Missile Defense System(BMDS) Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement," Missile Defense Agency, USA. pp. 2-7, 2007.
  10. Ministry of National Defense, "Defense White Paper," Ministry of National Defense, Republic of Korea, pp. 71-72, 2016.
  11. T. Shima, M. Idan and O. Golan, "Sliding-Mode Control for Integrated Missile Autopilot Guidance," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 250-260, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.14951
  12. J. Chen, S. Li and J. Lei "Modeling and Simulation of Standard II Missiles Intercepting a Low Target," Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 846-847, pp. 1505-1508, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.846-847.1505
  13. F. Johansson, "Evaluating the Performance of TEWA Systems," Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Skovde, Skovde, 2010.
  14. J. Ahn and Y. Kwon, "Analysis of the Flight Trajectory Characteristics of Ballistic Missiles Depending on the Operational Parameters," Journal of Korea Association of Defense Industry Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 119-136, 2013.
  15. T. Park and J. Lim, "RCS of Ballistic Missile Based on Radar Position," Journal of Korea Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 209-216, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2015.40.1.209
  16. K. Lee, Y. Kwon and J. Kim, "A Study on the Analysis of the RCS Characteristics for Aegis BMD," The 7th Conf. National Defense Technology, pp. 92-102, July. 2011.
  17. P. Vick, "North Korea Missile, Nodong," Federation of American Scientists, 2016, https://fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/missile/nd-1.htm(accessed Apr 25, 2018).
  18. A. An, "Sejong the Great, Detected First North Korean Rocket Launching in 94 Seconds," Hankookilbo, December 12, 2012, http://hankookilbo.com/v/e1bccc1a4536459e92a3ade12e649dc8(accessed Apr 25, 2018).
  19. H. Jean, "System Architecture for Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Defense(ASBMD)," Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive, USA, pp. 20-37, 2009.
  20. Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Joint Concept for Command and Control of the Joint Aerial Layer Network," Joint Chiefs of Staff, USA, pp. C-23, 2015.
  21. S. Choi and Y. Kim, "Distributed Air Defense Simulation Model and its Applications," Journal of Military Operations Research Society of Korea, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 134-148, 2001.
  22. B. Klingner, "South Korea Needs THAAD Missile Defense," 2015, The Heritage Foundation, https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/south-korea-needs-thaad-missile-defense(accessed Apr 25, 2018).
  23. Digital Content Team, "5 Military Satellite Deployment from the Dearly 2020s," June 11, 2014), http://www.kookje.co.kr/news2011/asp/newsbody.asp?code=0100&key=20140611.99002180630(accessed May 04, 2018).
  24. Nuclear Threat Initiative, "Israel Missile Chronology," 2010, http://www.nti.org/media/pdfs/israel_missile.pdf?_=1316466791(accessed May 04, 2018).
  25. Global Security, "Arrow-Specification," 2017, https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/israel/arrow-specs. htm(accessed July 31, 2018).
  26. Sputnik News, "South Korea Seeks PAC-3 Precision-Guided Missiles from Lockheed Martin," Sputnik news, February 21, 2018, https://sputniknews.com/military/201802211061848210-south-korea-pac-3-missile-lockheed(accessed July 31, 2018).
  27. DTaQ, "Global Defense News," DTaQ, Vol. 1468, No. 6, 2016.
  28. Astronautix, "Patriot," 2017, http://www.astronautix.com/p/patriot.html(accessed July 31, 2018).
  29. U. Yang, "Compared to the Japanese MD System, Korea's Missile at Infancy," Sisa Journal, August 18, 2016, http://www.sisapress.com/journal/article/156797(accessed July 31, 2018).
  30. J. Ahn and M. Kang, "The 6th Nationwide College Student Military Policy Excellent Paper," Korea Institute for Crisis Management Analysis, Seoul, pp. 41-68, 2015.
  31. S. Lee, "Target Detection, Identification, Missile Tracking ... Three-Dimensional Core Sensor of Chungung", Kookbangilbo, October 15, 2014, http://kookbang.dema.mil.kr/kookbangWeb/view.do?ntt_writ_date=20141016&bbs_id=BBSMSTR_000000001060&parent_no=1(accessed Sep 10, 2018).
  32. H. Park, "The Power of Multi-Layered Air Defense, North Korea Aircraft and Missile 'Freeze'," Economic Review, November 23, 2017, http://www.econovill.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=327111(accessed Sep 10, 2018).
  33. D. Kim, "Domestic Mid-Range Surface-to-Air Missile Chungung Defended Pyeongchang Air," Now News, April 13, 2018, http://nownews.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20180413601005(accessed Sep 10, 2018).
  34. Forecast International, "MPQ-53(V) (Patriot)," 2005, https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=691(accessed Sep 10, 2018).
  35. NATO, Fact Sheet-Augmentation of Turkey's Air Defence, Belgium, NATO, 2017.
  36. T. Eshel, "Cheongung - a New MR-SAM for the South Korean Multi-Tier Defense System," Defense Update, December 17, 2011, https://defense-update.com/20111217_cheongung_mrsam.html(accessed Sep 15, 2018).
  37. J. Lim, "Korea in Final Phase of Developing Low-Tier Missile Defense System: Official," The Korea Herald, April 16, 2017, http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20170416000054(accessed Sep 15, 2018).
  38. S. Kim, "KAMD's Interceptor, Improved M-SAM, L-SAM," The Herald Business, September 13, 2016, http://heraldk.com/2016/09/13/%EB%B6%81%ED%95%B5-%EB%8C%80%EC%9D%91%EB%AC%B4%EA%B8%B0kamd%EC%9D%98-%EC%9A%94%EA%B2%A9%EC%88%98%EB%8B%A8-%EC%B2%9C%EA%B6%81-%EA%B0%9C%EB%9F%89%ED%98%95-m-sam-l-sam/(accessed Sep 15, 2018).