DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교수학습지원센터의 BSC 모형 개발

Development of BSC Model of Center for Teaching and Learning

  • 김용준 (경기과학기술대학교 산업경영과) ;
  • 김소윤 (경기과학기술대학교 아동영어보육과) ;
  • 조창희 (경기과학기술대학교 정밀기계과)
  • Kim, Yongjun (Department of Industrial Management, Gyeong-gi College of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Soyun (Department of Early Childhood English Education & Child Care, Gyeong-gi College of Science and Technology) ;
  • Cho, Changhee (Department of Precision Mechanical Engineering, Gyeong-gi College of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.07
  • 심사 : 2019.12.27
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

In this study, BSC model of center for teaching and learning was developed using balanced scorecard suitable for non-profit organization. Firstly, relevant literature surveys and evaluation indicators of various CTL and institution with similar characteristics were examined. Next, a draft BSC model was designed through interviews of specialists. Lastly, the BSC model was proposed by verifying the content validity of the evaluation model by conducting two Delphi surveys. The BSC model of CTL has 4 perspectives: resource, customer, internal process, learning and growth, 9 critical success factors: 2 factors in resource, customer and learning and growth perspectives, 3 factors in internal process perspective, and 23 key performance Indicators: 4 indicators in resource and learning and growth, 7 indicators in customer perspective, 8 indicators in internal process perspective. The implications of this study through the results were as follows: firstly, the proposed BSC model showed an evaluation model suitable for a non-profit organization. Second, the BSC model was linked to the organization's mission and vision. Third, it could contribute to the long-term development of CTL. Lastly, if it could be applied to management, and evaluated, it is expected to play a role of providing basic data for the budget support and spread of the university.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cha, G.Y. and Kim, J.Y., A Case Study of Developing Management Performance Indices for Government funded Research Institute using BSC and AHP, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 2016, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 1083-1107.
  2. Grant, J.S. and Davis, L.L., Focus on quantitative methods : Selection and use of content experts for instrument development, Research in Nursing and Health, 1997, Vol. 20, pp. 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  3. Heo, G. and Won, H.H., A Study of Development for Performance Evaluation Model in the Center for Teaching and Learning, The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 2008, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 77-84. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2008.11.6.007
  4. Hyun, Y.S. and Kwon, D.B., Prediction of New Changes in the Accountabilities of Life-Long Educational Institutions for Learner, Society and Institutional Management by Analysis of Delphi Surveyed by the Workers of the Life-Long Educational Institutions, The Korean Society of Human Resource Development, 2007, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-26.
  5. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., Translating strategy into action : The balanced scorecard, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
  6. Kim, G.H. and Yun, M.H., Development of BSC Performance Evaluation Model for University Lifelong Education Centers, Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 2014, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 155-180. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2014.05.10.2.155
  7. Kim, H.B., An Effective Construction & Management of Instructional Service System, Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 2004, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 195-226.
  8. Kim, K.C. and Kim, E.J., An analysis on the Current Condition and Content of the Early Childhood Education part in the City and Province Unit Teaching and Learning Service Center, The Korea Society for Children's Media, 2005, Vol. 4, pp. 85-105.
  9. Lawshe, C.H., A quantitative approach to content validity, Personnel Psychology, 1975, Vol. 28, pp. 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  10. Lee, J.G., The teaching development approach strategy of unit university level, Higher Education, 2006, Vol. 140, pp. 73-84.
  11. Lee, S.J. and Lee, S.B., Performance Measurement of the Public Sector from a BSC Perspective : The Case of PBLIS, Korea Institute for Local Administration, 2005, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 155-186.
  12. Noh, K.H., A Study on the Introduction and Operation of Center for Teaching and Learning, The Korean Society for Information Management, 2007, Vol. 22, pp. 25-59.
  13. Park, E.S., A Study on Developing Outcome Evaluation Model for CTL Teaching Competency Enforcing Program in University, The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2019, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 647-658.
  14. Park, M.S., A Study on Application of BSC of the Non-Profit Organization, The Korean Regional Development Association, 2008, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 127-150.
  15. Park, S.H., A Study on the Integrated Performance Evaluation of the Programs Operated by the University's Center for Teaching and Learning, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 2019, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2019.31.1.1
  16. Song, H.D. and Shin, S.G., The Development of a Performance Evaluation System for Research Education Institute based on Balanced Scorecard, Soongsil University, Korea Lifelong Education and HRD Institute, 2010, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.35637/klehrd.2010.6.3.001
  17. Yoo, D.G., Chung, A.K., and Hong, Y.N., Development of Evaluation Indicators on CTLE(Center for Teaching and Learning of Excellence), Journal of College Education, 2014, Vol. 15, No. 3-4, pp. 173-185.
  18. Yun, S.O., Exploring the applicability of the BSC technique in the level of information, Korea Public Administration Journal, 2003, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 36-68.

피인용 문헌

  1. 균형성과표(BSC)를 활용한 탄약 비군사화 시설의 핵심성과지표 개발 vol.44, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2021.44.1.017