Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Characteristics of 16 Scenes of Chilitan and Management of Chiltanjung, Milyang

밀양 칠탄정 경영과 칠리탄 16경의 경관특성

  • Kim, Soo-jin (Department of Landscape Architecture, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Jung, Hae-Joon (Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Engineering, Keimyung University)
  • 김수진 (목포대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 정해준 (계명대학교 공과대학 도시학부 생태조경학전공)
  • Received : 2019.06.20
  • Accepted : 2019.07.12
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research identified landscape characteristics of Chilitan(칠리탄) area, which had been managed by Son Giyang(1559~1617, p. Ohhan), in order to understand the political viewpoint and ideal landscapes, sought after by Confucian scholars in the 16~17th century. As the research method for the interpretation of each scene's spatial strucutres and meanings, paintings and poems in Chiltanjungsipyukgyeongdo(the Paintings of the 16 Scenes of Chiltanjung Area) were analyzed, which were followed by the on-site survey. Son lived hermit life with the nature after he decided to retire into the country for the chaotic political environment in the 4th year of Gwanghaegun's reign. Admiring Eum Jareung(B.C. 39-41, p. Eumgwang)'s hermit life, he named a headstream to Chilitan, erected pavilion and made place for angling by the stream, as Eum did in the hermitage. However he worried the king and royal politics in spite of his hermit life, which showed his political viewpoint of Confucianism. In addition, every column of buildings in the garden was named in order to imply both thoughts of Neo-Confucianism and Idleness Naturalism, which highlight a moral training and being comfortable amid poverty and taking pleasure in and honest life style. The present landscape of wonlim could be back to 1936, where Unganru, Byeokripjae and Chiltanjung are surrounding Eupcheondang. Chines character, such as Jimamsuseok, Giam, Ohhansonsunseongjanggujiso and Jogi, are inscribed on the rocks in the landscape garden, from which placeness could be inferred. According to the record of the construction, pine, fir, paulownia, ginkgo, peach trees, bamboo and lotus were planted, and ginkgo, bamboo, crape myrtle, pine and chestnut tress are still living in the garden, which mean plants had been planted in the light of their practical values as well as symbolic meanings. The method for describing 16 scenes of Chiltanjung could be characterized to the structure of 「Place+Scene(a particural activity, event, or action), and these placeness could be analyzed by categorizing the scene to near, middle and far views. Each scene symbolically presents a hermit, noble man, Taoist ideology, homeland, or peacetime, which were adpoted to depict landscapes of Chiltanjung area as the Confucian utopia.

본 연구는 오한 손기양이 경영한 칠리탄 일원의 경관특성을 고찰함으로써 조선 16~17세기 선비가 지향했던 출처관과 이상적인 경관을 이해하고자 하였다. 연구의 방법으로는 「칠탄정십육경도」에 묘사된 그림과 시문 그리고 현장답사를 진행하여 각 경의 구조와 해석을 진행하였다. 오한은 광해군 4년 조정의 정치가 날로 문란해지자 은거를 결심하고 낙향하게 되는데, 평소 엄자릉의 은일적 삶을 흠모하여 엄자릉이 칠탄을 경영한 것과 같이 원래의 종천을 칠리탄이라 이름하고 그 주변 정자에 짓고, 낚시하는 장소를 마련하는 등 자연에 귀의하는 삶을 살고자 하였다. 하지만 은거를 하고 있음에도 임금과 조정을 걱정하는 등 도학적 출처관을 지향하고 있으며, 칠탄정 원림 건물의 각 기둥에 이름을 붙임으로써 수신, 안빈낙도 등의 성리학적 사유와 무위자연을 표상하고자 하였다. 현재의 모습은 1936년 모습이며, 읍청당을 중심으로 운강루, 벽립재, 칠탄정 등이 위치하고 있다. 원림 주변에는 '진암수석', '기암', '오한손선생장구지소', '조기' 등의 각자가 남아있어 당시의 장소정체성을 유추할 수 있다. 또한 중건기 등의 기록에 의하면 칠탄정 주변으로 소나무를 비롯한 전나무, 오동나무, 은행나무, 연꽃, 복숭아, 대나무 등이 식재되었다고 하며, 현재 은행나무와 배롱나무, 소나무와 밤나무가 발견되는데, 식물의 상징성과 실용성을 고려하여 식재한 것으로 추정된다. 칠탄정 16경의 경관묘사 방법은 '장소+경관(행위)'의 구조로, 칠탄정을 중심으로 근경, 중경, 원경이라는 장소적 특징을 분류하여 해석하였으며, 칠탄정 일원의 각 경관을 은자를 비롯한, 군자, 신선사상, 향토경관, 태평성대 등을 상징화하여 유교적 이상향을 노래하고 있음을 알 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, S. J. and Sim, W. K.(2005). Yulgok(栗谷)cs View of Ideal Landscape Depicted in Gosangugok. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 23(4): 1-13.
  2. Kim, T. S.(2009). Ideal World and Nature Management at Hermits of Neo-confucian Scholar in Joseon Dynast. Dr thesis. Graduate School, Korea University.
  3. Choi, S. E.(2004). Aesthric sense and literary value of the narrative poems of noblemen in the Joseon Dynasty, Seoul: Bogosa.
  4. Son, O, K.(2006). Aesthetics of Shan-shui, Jeju: Jeju National University Press.
  5. Son, P. J.(1991). Study of Chinese Poetry depicting Chiltanji, Dongyang Studies in Korean Classics 6(-): 105-148.
  6. Choi, K. H.(2006). The poems about scenery viewed from a pavilion (樓亭集景詩) and the spatial character of the pavilion. 22(-): 375-415.
  7. Choi, K. H.(2018). Aspects of the Relation between Poetic Scenes and Pictorial Scenes through Comparing Chil Tan Pavilion sixteen pictures and Lee Ik's Chil Tan Pavilion sixteen poems. Dongyang studies in Korean Classics 51(-): 277-310. https://doi.org/10.35374/DYHA.51.51.201810.010
  8. Gukyeuk Chiltanji(國譯 七灘誌)
  9. https://blog.naver.com/blisskim47/220924251498
  10. National Geographic Information Institute(1914). The map in Daejung 3rd.
  11. Cho, G. H.(2006). Estate paintings of the Joseon Dynasty, Dr thesis. Graduate School, Seoul National University.
  12. https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=2374105&cid=62064&categoryId=62064
  13. Hong, M. S.(2006). Jeungbosanrimgyongje I. Jeonju: Rural Development Administration.
  14. https://news.joins.com/article/6976134
  15. Wiansingpay and Kim, S. Y.(2012). The Borderline between Culture and Painting - drawing Tao Yan Ming, Paju: Taehaksa.
  16. Geum, J. T.(2001). Scholars and their Spirits of Korea, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  17. Heo, G.(2003). Our Old Paintings Analyzed by Meanings. Seoul: Korea Text Book.
  18. Yu, J. H.(2007). Go Culture in the Joseon Dynasty understood with Paintings. the 7th Conference of Baduk Studies. pp.21-42.
  19. Ma, H. and Jin J. G.(1997). Hermi Life of China. Seoul: Dongmunseon.
  20. Shin, E. G.(1999). Pungryu: Seoul: Bogosa.
  21. Heo, G.(2001). Contents and Symbols of Traditional Arts, Seoul: Gyobo Books.
  22. Sim. W. K.(2003). A Study on Usages of Lotus in the Korean Traditional Gardens, Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 21(4):72-80.
  23. Jin, J. H.(2002). Study of Danwon Kim Hongdo, Seoul: Iljisa.
  24. Miryang Cultural Center(http://miryang.kccf.or.kr)
  25. Gu, M. R.(2002). Symbolic World of Korea, Seoul: Gyobo Books.
  26. Ju, G. H.(2006). Dorae : The History of Farmers, Seoul: Dulnyouk.
  27. Simonds. J .H and Ahn, D. M.(2016). Landscape architecture 5th edition, Seoul: Gimundang.