Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Questioning Characteristics of Elementary Science Gifted Education Teaching Materials using the Sternberg's View of Successful Intelligence: Focused on Semantic Network Analysis

Sternberg의 성공지능 관점을 적용한 초등 과학영재교육 교재의 발문 특성 분석: 언어네트워크분석을 중심으로

  • Chung, Duk Ho (Division of Science Education/Science Education Institute, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Jin, Mina (Division of Science Education/Science Education Institute, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Kyeong-Jin (Global Institute for Talented Education, KAIST)
  • 정덕호 (전북대학교 과학교육학부/과학교육연구소) ;
  • 진미나 (전북대학교 과학교육학부/과학교육연구소) ;
  • 박경진 (KAIST 과학영재교육연구원)
  • Received : 2019.12.20
  • Accepted : 2019.12.30
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

From the perspective of science gifted education, the successful intelligence theory is a means to understand how the gifted education curriculum reflects the characteristics of science gifted students. The purpose of this study is to investigate if the successful intelligence is fully reflected in the teaching materials of two gifted education centers (GECDOE: Gifted Education Center affiliated with District Office of Education, GSEIU: Gifted Science Education Institute attached to University). For this study, we selectively used 143 (GECDOE) and 134 questions (GSEIU) from the teaching materials of two gifted education centers. Those questions is analyzed through the semantic network analysis method. The results are as follow. First, the teaching materials of two gifted education centers are not evenly reflected in the successful intelligence, such as analytical ability, creative ability, and practical ability. Second, the teaching materials of two gifted education centers intensively demands analytical ability for students such as 'identify problem', 'represent and organize information', and 'additional prompts for analytical thinking'. Third, the teaching materials of two gifted education centers are presented to students without linking each frame of successful intelligence to one another. As the gifted students are quick to learn and show a preference for more complex thinking, it is necessary to develop teaching materials to experience the various abilities and promote integrated thinking according to the level of the gifted students. In this respect, this study is expected to be used as useful information for developing teaching materials to support customized education for gifted students.

과학영재교육 관점에서 성공지능 이론은 영재교육과정이 과학영재의 특성에 맞게 제시되고 있는지를 파악할 수 있는 수단이 된다. 이 연구의 목적은 초등 과학영재교육 교재에 제시된 발문 특성을 Sternberg의 성공지능 관점을 적용하여 분석하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위하여 교육청 영재교육원 2곳과 대학부설 영재교육원 1곳의 초등 과학영재교육 교재에 제시된 발문 각각 143개와 134개를 추출한 후, 이렇게 추출된 발문들의 구조적 특성에 차이가 있는지를 비교하기 위해 언어네트워크분석 방법을 활용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교육청 및 대학부설 영재교육원의 교재는 분석적 능력, 창의적 능력, 실행적 능력 등과 같은 성공지능을 균형 있게 반영하지 못하고 있었다. 둘째, 교육청 및 대학부설 영재교육원의 교재는 학생들에게 '문제 확인하기', '정보 표상하고 조직하기', '분석적 사고 촉진하기' 등 분석적 능력 영역을 집중적으로 요구하고 있었다. 셋째, 교육청 및 대학부설 영재교육원의 교재는 성공지능의 각 프레임 요소를 서로 유기적으로 연결되지 못한 채 제시되고 있다는 한계를 보였다. 과학영재들은 일반학생과 달리 학습속도가 빠르고 보다 복합적인 사고를 선호하는 특성을 보이기 때문에, 앞으로 과학영재교육 교재를 개발할 때에는 과학영재의 수준에 맞게 다양한 영역의 능력을 경험하고 통합적 사고를 촉진할 수 있도록 개발할 필요가 있을 것이다. 이런 측면에서 이 연구는 과학영재들의 맞춤형 교육지원을 위한 교재 개발을 위해 유용한 정보로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., 1983, A spreading activating theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
  2. Cho, J. I., Lee, S. K., Kim, J. H., Choi, G. S., and Ko, M. S., 2006, Analysis of activities for elementary school science gifted. Journal of Science Education, Chonnam National University, 30(1), 45-52. (in Korean)
  3. Colbert, J. T., Olson, J. K., and Clough, M. P., 2007, Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes, CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-07-0171
  4. Ha, D. S., Cho, H. U., and Park, J. K., 2009, Analysis of the lecture subjects used in gifted elemental chemical course of 6 science-gifted education centers affiliated to 6 universities. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 1(1), 43-63. (in Korean)
  5. Jeong, M. H., 2008, Development of a rubric for evaluation of science-gifted education centers' programs. Graduate School of Dankook University. 208 p. (in Korean)
  6. Jung, H. C., Sin, Y. J., and Cho, S. H., 2013, Analyses of curriculum at institutes for science gifted education in universities: Focused on enrichment step. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(2), 215-236. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.2.215
  7. Jung, M. S., Chun, M. R., and Chae, H. K., 2011, Analysis of the questioning styles in the students' chemistry text materials of education centers for the scientifically gifted Students. The Korean Society for School Science, 5(1), 8-16. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15737/ssj.5.1.201102.8
  8. Kim, D. H., 2007, A Study on the adequacy of the 'inquiry activities' in high school 'law and society' textbook. Journal of Research in Curriculum and Instruction, 11(1), 341-364. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2007.11.1.341
  9. Kim, J. C., 2016, What textbooks will you teach the students who will live in the fourth industrial revolution? Korea Textbook Research Foundation, 5 p. (in Korean)
  10. Kim, S. Y., Lee, S. Y., Shin, J. H., and Choi W., 2015, A study of secondary mathematics materials at a gifted education center in science attached to a university using network text analysis. The Mathematical Education, 29(3), 465-489. (in Korean)
  11. Kim, Y. H., Chung, D. H., Cho, K. S., Choi, J. A., and Park, K. J., 2011, A perception of beginning earth science teachers on porphyritic texture. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(7), 860-870. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.7.860
  12. Lee, S. H. and Choi, S. I., 2015, Comprehensive review of research publications on gifted education in Korea: 2003-2012. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(6), 881-904. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.6.881
  13. Lee, Y. M., 2006, Developmental tendency and relative potency of successful intelligence in predicting academic performance of elementary school children. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 19(2), 101-123. (in Korean)
  14. Ministry of Education, 2018, The 4th comprehensive gifted education promotion plan. Ministry of Education, 34 p. (in Korean)
  15. Park, K. J., Chung, D. H., and Cho, K. S., 2013, An analysis of the changes of high school students' conceptual structure about sedimentary rocks before and after the field Trip using the semantic network analysis. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 34(2), 173-186. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2013.34.2.173
  16. Park, K. J., Ryu, C. R., and Choi, J. S., 2017, An analysis of learning objective characteristics of educational programs of centers for the university affiliated sciencegifted education using semantic network analysis. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 27(1), 17-35. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2017.27.1.17
  17. Park, Y. H. and Choi, S. Y., 2014, Comparative analysis of successful intelligence and learning strategies for the scientific gifted and the regular students in elementary school. Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 612-624. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.3.612
  18. Ro, D. and Lee, S. D., 2014, Exploring the applicability of the program for practical intelligence development in gifted education. The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang University, 33(2), 57-86. (in Korean)
  19. Shin, S. C., and Park, K. B., 2018, Development and application of STEAM program for improving successful intelligence of gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 28(3), 341, 361. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2018.28.3.341
  20. Sternberg, R. J., 1996, Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. USA, New York: Simon and Schuster.
  21. Sternberg, R. J., 2003, Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. USA, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Sternberg, R. J., 2013, Intelligence. In Freedheim, D. K. and Weiner, I. B.(Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: History of psychology. USA, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  23. Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L., 2002, The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(4), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600403
  24. Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L., 2007, Teaching for successful intelligence: To increase student learning and achievement. USA, California: Corwin Press.
  25. Wang, H. A., 1998, Science textbook studies reanalysis: teachers "friendly" content analysis methods? Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, USA.
  26. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, s., N., Renzulli, J. S., Pucell, J., Leppien, J., and Burns, D., 2002, The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge highability learners. Corwin Press, CA, USA, 161 p.
  27. Van Tassel-Vaska, J., 2003, What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections oh theory, research, and practice. Handbook of Gifted Education, 3, 174-183.
  28. Yang, T. Y., Han, K. S., Lee, J. H., Park, I. H., and Kim, E., 2013, An analysis of appropriateness of the teaching materials for gifted students. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 5(1), 1-14. (in Korean)