참고문헌
- 교육과학기술부 (2009). 고등학교 교육과정 해설. 서울: 교육과학기술부.
- 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제2011-361호[별책 8].
- 교육부 (2015a). 교사용지도서 수학 5-2. 천재교육.
- 교육부 (2015b). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호[별책 8].
- 김민혁 (2013). 수학교사의 교과서 및 교사용 지도서 활용도 조사. 학교수학, 15(3), 503-531.
- 방정숙, 권미선, 김정원 (2012). 초등학교 우수 수업 동영상에 나타난 좋은 수학 수업의 특징 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 16(3), 403-426.
- 배수경 (2015). 중등 수학 교사의 수학적 지식의 교수학적 변환에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
- 윤나미 (1999). Brousseau의 교수학적 상황론의 이해와 적용. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교.
- 이경화 (2016). 교수학적 변환 연구의 동향과 과제. 수학교육학연구, 26(2), 173-188.
- 주형미, 양윤정, 남창우, 이광우 (2014). 2014 KICE 이슈페이퍼: 교과서 완결 학습 구현을 위한 교과용도서 실태 및 요구 분석. 연구자료 ORM 2014-27-24.
- Alajmi, A. (2009). Addressing computational estimation in the Kuwaiti curriculum: Teachers' views. Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9106-3
- Artzt, F., Armour- Thomas, E., Curcio, F. R., & Gurl, T. J. (2015). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: a guide for observations and self-assessment(3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2006). Textbooks on the map of Science studies, Science & Education, 15, 667-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-1243-1
- Bosch, M., & Gascon, J. (2006). Twenty-Five Years of the Didactic Transposition, ICMI Bulletin No.58.
- Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Brown, C. A., & Baird, J. (1993). Inside the teacher: Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 245-259). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Bush, W.S. (1986). Pre-service teachers' sources of decisions in teaching secondary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17 (1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/749316
- Clark, R. E. (2001). Media are "mere vehicles": The opening argument, in R. E. Clark(ed.), Learning with Media, Information Age Publishing, Conneticut, Chapter 1, pp. 1-12.
- Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 765-777. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0530-6.
- Galili, I., & Tseitlin, M. (2003). Newton's first law: Text, translations, interpretations and Physics education, Science & Education, 12, 45-73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022632600805
- Gelfman, E., A. Podstrigich, & R. Losinskaya (2004). On the problem of typology and functions of school texts, Discussion Group 14, Focus on the Development and Research of Mathematics Textbooks. ICME X, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology. New York, NY: Longman.
- Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
- Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Hirsch, C., Lappan, G., Reys, B., & Reys, R. (2005). Curriculum as a focus for improving school mathematics. Mathematicians and Education Reform Forum Newsletter, 18(1), 1-14.
- Johansson, M. (2003). Textbooks in mathematics education. A study of textbooks as the potentially implemented curriculum (Licentiate thesis). Department of Mathematics, Lulea University of Technology.
- Johansson, M. (2006). Textbooks as instruments: three teachers' ways to organize their mathematics lessons. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 11 (3), 5-30.
- Laborde, C., & Vergnaud, G. (1994). L'apprentissage et l' enseignement des mathematiques. Apprentissages et didactiques, ou en est-on? Hachette, Paris.
- Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom - the teachers' view. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education. 20. 129- 156.
- Lloyd, G. M. (2002). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials. The role of curriculum in teacher development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 149-160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in Middle School textbooks: An empirical approach, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040409.63571.56
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: findings from IEA's Trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
- Newton, D. P. (1990). Teaching with Text: Choosing, Preparing and Using Textual Materials forInstruction. Kogan Page, London.
- Pepin, B., Gueudet, G. & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0526-2
- Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 550-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/749691
- Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
- Robitaille, D. F. & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies of achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 687-709). New York: Macmillan.
- Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national investigation of curriculum and learning. San Fransisco, CA: Jossie-Bass.
- Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences students' learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557-628). Charlotte, FL: Information Age.
- Stein, M.. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A. & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing Standards-based Mathematics Instructions: A casebook for professional development(2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Swanepoel, S. (2010). The assessment of the quality of science education textbooks: conceptual framework and instruments for analysis(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa, South Africa.
- Thompson, D. R. & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0622-y
- Tornroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005
- Tyson-Bernstein, H. & Woodward, A. (1991). Nineteenth century policies for twenty-first century practice: the textbook reform dilemma. In P. Altbach, G. Kelly, H. Petrie & L. Weis (Eds.), Textbooks in American society, (pp. 91-104). Albany: SUNY Press.
- Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H. & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book. Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learncontext-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational studies in Mathematics, 89, 41-65. doi:10.1007/s10649-015- 9595-1.
- Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word problem solving tasks in textbooks and their relation to student performance. Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.6.347-360