DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Appropriate Spatial unit to Measure Biodiversity Using National Ecosystem Survey Data

전국자연환경조사 자료를 이용한 생물다양성 정량화의 적정공간단위 연구

  • Lee, Kyung-Il (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Hwang, Jin-Hoo (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Jang, Rae-Ik (Environmental GIS/RS Center, Korea University) ;
  • Ryu, Ji-Eun (Environmental GIS/RS Center, Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Seong-Woo (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 이경일 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 황진후 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 장래익 (고려대학교 환경GIS/RS센터) ;
  • 류지은 (고려대학교 환경GIS/RS센터) ;
  • 전성우 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.30
  • Accepted : 2018.10.23
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

Biodiversity refers to the diversity of organisms originating from all sources, including terrestrial ecosystems, aquatic ecosystems, and complex ecosystems and it is considered to be the standard of the area to be preserved and protected. So The Importance of environmental assessment for biodiversity conservation is increasing and International efforts to quantify biodiversity and to develop indices have been made, but there are insufficient researches on the use of biomass databases and their quantification in Korea. In this study, the biodiversity map was constructed using the 3rd National Ecosystem Survey Mammal Data with three spatial units(Administrative Area, 1:5,000 index map, hexagonal lattice). and the difference of map constructed by spatial unit was suggested to help research on quantification and evaluation of biodiversity in the future. As a result of the study, biodiversity index for the same area varied according to the spatial unit and overall average and standard deviation were different too. Therefore it is necessary to utilize appropriate spatial unit considering the suitability and purpose of quantification rather than using specific unit. It also showed the necessity of establishing a standard for biodiversity index as a result of comparative analysis with ecosystem and nature map. Based on this research, comprehensive efforts should be made for the sustainable development of the country through further research and institutional improvement for quantification and evaluation of biodiversity, set standards.

Keywords

References

  1. Beazley, K..Smandych, L..Snaith, T.. MacKinnon, F..Austen-Smith, P. and Duinker, P. 2005. Biodiversity considerations in conservation system planning: map-based approach for Nova Scotia, Canada. Ecological Applications 15(6) : 2192-2208. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5270
  2. Birch, C. P..Oom, S. P. and Beecham, J. A. 2007. Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecological modelling 206(3-4) : 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.041
  3. Condit, R. S..Ashton, M. S..Balslev, H.. Brokaw, N. V..Bunyavejchewin, S.. Chuyong, G. B..... and Ewango, C. E. 2005. Tropical tree a-diversity: results from a worldwide network of large plots. Biol. Skr. 55 : 565-582
  4. Cho, S.R..Yi, J.H. and Han, Y.D. 2014. Birds and Mammals of Mt. Seongju. Korean Journal of Nature Conservation 12(1-2) : 79-86,(In Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.30960/kjnc.2014.12.1_2.79
  5. Jenks, G. F. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. International yearbook of cartography 7 : 186-190.
  6. Kim, J.Y..Seo. C.W..Kwon, H.S..Ryu, J.E. and Kim, M.J. 2012. A Study on the Species Distribution Modeling using National Ecosystem Survey Data. Korea Society of Environmental Impact Assessment 21(4) : 593-607.(In Korean with English summary)
  7. Kim, T.W..Kim, B.S..Chang, M.H..Park, S.G..Han, S.H. and Oh, H.S. 2013. Mammal Fauna in Mt. Unmun, South Korea. The Korea Society of Environmental Biology 31(1) : 53-59.(In Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2013.31.1.053
  8. Kim, J.Y..Kwon, H.S..Seo. C.W. and Kim, M.J. 2014. A nationwide analysis of mammalian biodiversity hotspots in South Korea. Korea Society of Environmental Impact Assessment 23(6) : 453-465.(In Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.453
  9. Koo, M.H..Lee. D.K. and Jung. T.Y. 2012. A Study on the Contexts of Ecosystem Services in the Policymaking Process. Journal of the Korean Environmental Restoration Technology 15(5) : 85-102.(In Korean with English summary)
  10. Kwon, Y.H..Rho, T.H..Lee, H.W. and Jung, H. R. 2006. Introduction of biodiversity items in environmental evaluation. KEI Research Report; 1-173.(In Korean with English summary)
  11. Lee, H. Y. and Noh, S.C. 2012. Advanced Statistical Analysis: Theory and practice. Bobmunsa.(In Korean)
  12. Lee, D.K..Lee, M.K. and Jung, T.Y. 2014. Discuss Biodiversity as an Economy. Bomundang.(In Korean)
  13. Lee, J.H..Bae, I.S..Ha, K.T..You, S.S..Han, K.M..Eo, S.M..Jung, K..Lee, J.S. and Koo, J.Y. 2016. A Study on the Distribution Map Construction of Asbestos Buildings Owned by Seoul Using QGIS. Korea Society of Environmental Engineers 38(9) : 528-533.(In Korean with English summary)
  14. Magige, F., & Senzota, R. 2006. Abundance and diversity of rodents at the human-wildlife interface in western Serengeti, Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 44(3) : 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00641.x
  15. Morris, E. K..Caruso, T..Buscot, F..Fischer, M..Hancock, C..Maier, T. S..... and Socher, S. A. 2014. Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories. Ecology and evolution 4(18) : 3514-3524. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1155
  16. Ministry of Environment. 2006. 3rd National Ecosystem Survey Guideline. Ministry of Environment.National Institute of Environmental Research.(In Korean)
  17. Ministry of Environment. 2009. Mammals in Boryeong. (In Korean)
  18. Ministry of Environment. 2012. 4th National Ecosystem Survey Guideline. Ministry of Environment.National Institute of Environmental Research. (In Korean)
  19. Ministry of Environment. 2017. The Ecosystem Preservation Act. (In Korean)
  20. Myers, N..Mittermeier, R. A..Mittermeier, C. G..Da Fonseca, G. A. and Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772) : 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  21. Oh, I.C..Kwon, Y.H. and Rho, P.H. 2015. A study of Impact Assessment Considering Biodiversity Components in Korea. Korea Environment Institute. (In Korean)
  22. Orme, C. D. L..Davies, R. G..Burgess, M.. Eigenbrod, F..Pickup, N..Olson, V. A.. Webster, A. J..Ding, T. S..Rasmussen, P. C..Ridgely, R. S..Stattersfield, A. J.. Bennett, P. M..Blackburn, T. M..Gaston, K. J. and Owens, I. P. F. 2005. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436(7053) : 1016-1019. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03850
  23. Rabinowitz, A. R. and Walker, S. R. 1991. The carnivore community in a dry tropical forest mosaic in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7(1) : 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400005034
  24. Spellerberg, I. F. and Fedor, P. J. 2003. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916-2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the 'Shannon-Wiener' Index. Global ecology and biogeography 12(3) : 177-179. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00015.x