한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Big6 모델 및 수정 모델 분석 연구

Analysis of the Big6 Skills Model and the Modified Big6 Models

  • 투고 : 2018.08.19
  • 심사 : 2018.09.05
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 Big6 모델과 Big6 수정 모델을 분석하여 Big6 모델의 특징을 찾고 현장에서 Big6 모델을 적용하는데 필요한 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 이를 위하여 AASL과 ACRL의 정보 리터러시 기준과 Big6 모델을 비교하였으며, 교육목표분류학에 영향을 받은 Big6 모델과 Big6+3 모델, Big8 모델 및 LG사이언스랜드에서 제공하는 Big6 모델을 분석하였다. 분석결과, Big6 모델은 정보 문제 해결 모델과 메타인지 활성화 전략 및 학생들의 정보 리터러시를 향상시키는 발판으로 활용이 가능하였으며 구성주의, 탐구기반 학습, 교육과정 통합, 협력교육, ICT기술 모델로 활용이 가능하였다. 비판적 사고능력 향상은 Big6 모델보다 사서교사나 사서의 Big6 모델의 적용방법과 관련이 있었다. 사서교사와 사서는 Big6 모델을 적용하기 위하여 교육과정을 체계적이고 구체적으로 계획할 필요가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to analyse the Big6 model and the Big6 modification model to find out the characteristics of the Big6 model and to derive implications for applying the Big6 model in the field. For this purpose, the information literacy standards of the AASL and the ACRL were compared with the Big6 model. The Big6 model, influenced by Bloom's taxonomy was analyzed alongside the Big6+3 model, the Big8 model and the modified Big6 model, provided by LG Science Land. As a result, the Big6 model could be used as an information problem-solving model, metacognitive activation strategy, and scaffolding to improve students' information literacy. In addition, it could be used as a model for constructivism, inquiry-based learning, the integration of curriculum, collaborative education, and ICT technology. How teacher-librarians or librarians apply the Big6 model is related to the improvement of critical thinking skills. Teacher-librarians and librarians need to plan situations, subjects, topics, and methods in a systematic and specific way when applying the Big6 model to the information literacy curriculum.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Instruction according to the Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development. 2017. the Ministry of Education Instruction No. 217.
  2. Kim, Sung-Jung. 2011. A Study on the Development of Information Literacy Textbook, School Library and Information Literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3): 271-292. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
  3. Ro, Jin-Young, Woo-Yeoul Byun, and Byeong-Ki Lee. 2009. "A Study on the Design of Inquiry Instruction Model by Information Literacy Instruction in School Library." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1): 471-492. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.1.200903.471
  4. Bae, Kyung-Jae and Hee-Jin Park. 2013. "A Study on the Current Condition and the Improvement of Digital Literacy Education." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2): 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  5. Sakong, Bok-Hee. 2007. "A Study on Searching Behavior of Elementary School Students." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(3): 353-381.
  6. Sakong, Bok-Hee. 2012. "Searching Behavior of OPAC Users in Children's Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(1): 143-171.
  7. Education Research Institute of Seoul National University. ed. 1995. Glossary of education. Seoul: Hawoo.
  8. Suh, Jin-Won. 2012. A Study on an Application of Constructivism to Reading Instruction in the School Library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3): 265-289. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.265
  9. So, Byoung-Moon and Gi-Ho Song. 2017. "An Analysis on the Educational Contents of the Research Paper Writing Program through Information Problem Solving Model." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(2): 449-467. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.2.201706.449
  10. Song, Gi-Ho. 2015. "An Analysis of Elements of the Information Literacy Process within Common Inquiry Tasks of Textbooks in Korean Middle Schools Social Studies." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3): 233-252. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.233
  11. Shim, Gab-Yong et al. 2015. "A Study on the Development of Education Service Models Using Presidential Archives based on Ubiquitous Technology." Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 15(1): 127-155. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2015.15.1.127
  12. Shim, Wonsik, Hye-yeon Ahn, and Jeayeon Byun. 2015. "Exploring the Effects of Task Language and Complexity in College StudentsW' eb Searching." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2): 51-73. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.051
  13. Oh, Eui-Kyung. 2011. "An Analysis of Relationship Between Self-Cognition Level of Information Literacy and Library Anxiety." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(4): 123-137. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.123
  14. Lee, Soo-Sang. 2007. "A Survey Research on Information Literacy Level in Korean University Students." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1): 85-103. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.1.085
  15. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2006. "A Study on the Model of Library Assited Instruction Based on Information Activities." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(2): 25-46.
  16. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2007. "Institutionalization of Information Literacy Instruction and Library Assited Instruction Considering National Level Curriculum." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(1): 443-462. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.1.200703.443
  17. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2009. "Study on the Structure and Contents Analysis of America New School Library Standards Sets Standards for the 21st-Century Learner." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(3): 203-223. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.3.200909.203
  18. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2010. "Study on the Restructure of Information Literacy Process Based on Taxonomy Educational Objectives." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2): 107-126. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.107
  19. Lee, Seung-Gil. 2007. "The Effect of Teacher Librarian's Information Literacy on Library-Assisted Instruction." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(4): 161-180.
  20. Lee, Jeong-Mee. 2015. "An Exploratory Study on Adolescents' Perceptions of Library and their Information Use." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3): 351-370. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.351
  21. Lee, Jung-Yeoun. 2007. "A Study on the Effectiveness for Information Literacy Instruction in School Library." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(4): 67-85.
  22. Lee, Jung-Yeoun and Eun-Ju Choi. 2006. "An Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Education for Information Literacy." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1): 315-334.
  23. Choi, Moon Jung and Dong Youl Jeong. 2013. "A Study on the Effect of Metacognition to the Information-Seeking Behavior of Undergraduate Students." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2): 75-101. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.075
  24. Choi, Jae-Hwang. 2016. "Considering Core Ideas of ACRL Information Literacy 'Framework (2015)'." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3): 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171
  25. Chung, Jin Soo. 2010. "A Study on the Levels of the Instructional Activities by Korean Teacher-Librarians." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(1): 153-171. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.153
  26. Jung, Young-Mi. 2009. "Information Literacy Education and the Impact of Self Awareness on Information Literacy and Libraries." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4): 265-280. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.265
  27. Elementary and secondary Education Act. 2017. Act No. 14603.
  28. School Libraries Promotion Act. 2018. Act No. 15368.
  29. Enforcement Decree of the School Libraries Promotion Act. 2016. Presidential Decree No. 27129.
  30. LG Science Land Home page. [cited. 2018. 7. 30].
  31. AASL. 2007. Standards for the 21st century learner. Chicago: AASL.
  32. AASL. 2009. Empowering learners : Guidelines for School Library Programs. Chicago: AASL.
  33. AASL. 2018. National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago and London: ALA.
  34. AASL and AECT. 1998. Information Power : Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago and London: ALA.
  35. ACRL. 2015. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. [cited 2018. 7. 3].
  36. Anderson, Lorin W., and David R. Krathwohl. ed. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. complete ed. New York: Longman.
  37. Arroyo, S. S. 2013. "Information Literacy for Health Professionals: Teaching Essential Information Skills with the Big6 Information Literacy Model." Community & Junior College Libraries, 19: 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763915.2014.953435
  38. Baji, Fatima. et al. 2018. "Developing Information Literacy Skills of the 6th Grade Students Using the Big6 Model." Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 23(1): 1-15.
  39. Bloom, B. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of education goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
  40. Bot, R. C. 2008. Collaboration in the Elementary Setting while Introducing the Big6 Research Process and a Pathfinder. M. A. thesis. College of St. Scholastica, U. S.
  41. Bruce, C. 1997. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
  42. Bruce, C. 2004. "Information Literacy as a Catalyst for Educational Change: A Background Paper." In Danaher, P. A. ed. Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution? Qld.: Central Queensland University Press.
  43. Bruce, C. S. 2015. Information Literacy: Understanding Peoples' Information and Learning Experiences. [cited 2018. 7. 8].
  44. Buchanan, S. et al. 2016. "Inquiry Based Learning Models, Information Literacy, and Student Engagement: A Literature Review." School Libraries Worldwide, 22(2): 23-40.
  45. Callison, D. 2004. "Establishing Research Rigor in SLMR." Knowledge Quest, 32(5): 18-20.
  46. Callison, D. 2015. The Evolution of Inquiry: Controlled, Guided, Modeled, and Free. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  47. Candy, P. 2002. Lifelong Learning and Information Literacy. [cited 2018. 8. 8].
  48. Cavanaugh, J. C. and M. Perlmutter. 1982. Metamemory: A Critical Examination. Child Development, 53: 11-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129635
  49. Chen, Shu-Hsien L. 2003. "Searching the Online Catalog and the World Wide Web." Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 41(1): 29-43.
  50. Chen, L. C. 2011. The Effects of Integrated Information Literacy in Science Curriculum on First-Grade Students' Memory and Comprehension Using the Super3 Model. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(3): 399-411.
  51. Chen, L. C., Y. Chen, and W. Ma. 2014. "Effects of Integrated Information Literacy on Science Learning and Problem-Solving among Seventh-Grade Students." Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 19(2): 35-51.
  52. Chu, K. S. 2009. "Inquiry Project-Based Learning with a Partnership of Three Types of Teachers and the School Librarian." Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(8): 1671-1686. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21084
  53. Chu, S. K. W., S. K. Tse, and K. Chow. 2011. "Using Collaborative Teaching and Inquiry Project-Based Learning to Help Primary School Students Develop Information Literacy and Information Skills." Library & Information Science Research, 33(2): 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.017
  54. Chung, Jin Soo, and D. Neuman. 2007. "High School StudentsI' nformation Seeking and Use for Class Projects." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10): 1503-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20637
  55. Clark, R. E., P. A. Kirschner, and J. Sweller. 2012. "Putting Students on the Path to Learning: The Case for Fully Guided Instruction." American Educator, 36(1): 6-11.
  56. Detlor, B. et al. 2012. "Student Perceptions of Information Literacy Instruction: The Importance of Active Learning." Education for Information, 29: 147-161. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2012-0924
  57. Eisenberg M. 2003. "Technology for a Purpose: Technology for Information Problem-Solving with the Big6." TechTrends, 47(1): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763327
  58. Eisenberg, M. 2008. "Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age." Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2): 39-47.
  59. Eisenberg, M. and R. Berkowitz. 1988. Curriculum initiative: an agenda and strategy for library media programs. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  60. Eisenberg, M. and R. Berkowitz. 1990. Information problem solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. N.J.: Ablex.
  61. Eisenberg M., C. A. Lowe, K. L. Spitzer. 2004. Information Literacy. second edition. Connecticut: Library Unlimited.
  62. Eisenberg, M., C. McGuire, and K. L. Spitzer. 2004. Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. 2nd ed. CT: Libraries Unlimited.
  63. Eisenberg, M., D. Johnson, and B. Berkowitz. 2010. "Information, Communications, and Technology(ICT) Skills Curriculum Based on the Big6 Skills Approach to Information Problem-Solving." Library Media Connection, 28(6): 24-27.
  64. Eisenberg, M., J. Murray, and C. Bartow. 2016. The Big6 Curriculum-Comprehensive information and Communication Technology(ICT) Literacy for All Students. California: Libraries Unlimited.
  65. Elmborg, J. K. 2002. "Teaching at the desk: Toward a Reference Pedagogy." Portal, 2(3): 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2002.0050
  66. Elmborg, J. K. 2011. "Libraries as the Spaces between Us: Recognizing and Valuing the Third Space." Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(4), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.50n4.338
  67. ESSA. 2015. [cited 2018. 8. 10].
  68. ESEA. 2018. [cited 2018. 8. 10].
  69. Friesen, S. and D. Scott. 2013. Inquiry-Based Learning: A Review of the Research Literature. [cited 2018. 6. 28].
  70. Harada, V. H. 2016. "A Practice-Centered Approach to Professional Development: Teacher-Librarian Collaboration in Capstone Projects." School Library Research, 19.
  71. Hill, J. R., and Hannafin, Michael J. 1995. Cognitive Strategies and the Use of a Hyperm edia Information System: An Exploratory Study. [cited 2018. 6. 14].
  72. Hughes-Hassell, S., A. Brasfield, and D. Dupree. 2012. "Making the Most of Professional Learning Communities." Knowledge Quest, 41(2): 30-37.
  73. Kuhlthau, C. C. 2013. "Inquiry Inspires Original Research." School Library Monthly. 30(2): 5-8.
  74. Kuhlthau, C. C. and L. K. Maniotes. 2010. "Building Guided Inquiry Teams for 21st-Century Learners." School Library Monthly, 26(5): 18-21.
  75. Kuhlthau, C. C., L. K. Maniotes, and A. K. Caspari. 2015. Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. 2nd ed. CT: Libraries Unlimited.
  76. Levitov, D. 2016. "School Libraries, Librarians, and Inquiry Learning." Teacher Librarians, 43(3): 28-35.
  77. Little, G. 2011. "Keeping Moving: Smart Phone and Mobile Technologies in the Academic Library." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3): 267-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.03.004
  78. Mokhtar, I. A. et al. 2009. "Proposing a 6+3 model for developing information literacy standards for schools: A case for Singapore." Education for Information, 27: 81-101.
  79. Newell, T. 2009. "Examining Information Problem-Solving Instruction: Dynamic Relationship Patterns Mediated by Distinct Instructional Methodologies." School Libraries Worldwide, 15(2): 49-76.
  80. OECD. 2016. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks May 2016. [cited 2018. 8. 1].
  81. Okemura, A. 2008. "Designing Inquiry-Based Science Units as Collaborative Partners." School Library Media Activities Monthly, 25(3): 47-51.
  82. Partnership for 21st Century Schools. 2009. Framework for 21st Century Learning. [cited 2018. 8. 10].
  83. Sun, H. C. et al. 2011. "Role Changing for Librarians in the New Information Technology Era." New Library World, 112(7/8): 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801111150459
  84. Klomsri, T. and M. Tedre. 2016. "Poor Information Literacy Skills and Practices as Barriers to Academic Performance." Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(4): 293-305. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n4.293
  85. Todd, R. J. 2012. "School Libraries and the Development of Intellectual Agency: Evidence from New Jersey." School Library Research, 15.
  86. Valenza, J. K. 2006. "They Might Be Gurus." Teacher Librarian, 34(1): 18-26.
  87. Walraven, A., S. Brand-Gruwel, and H. P. Boshuizen. 2008. "Information-Problem Solving: A Review of Problems Students Encounter and Instructional Solutions." Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3): 623-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.030
  88. Williams, D. A. and L. Coles. 2007. "Evidence-Based Practice in Teaching: An Information Perspective." Journal of Documentation, 63(6): 812-835. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710836376
  89. Wolf, S., T. Brush, and J. Saye. 2003. "The Big Six Information Skills As a Metacognitive Scaffold: A Case Study." School Library Media Research, 6.