한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대안적 리더십이 대학도서관 사서의 조직유효성인식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 감성지능의 조절효과를 중심으로 -

A Study on the Effect of Alternative Leadership on the Recognition of Organizational Effectiveness of University Librarian: - Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence -

  • 차현주 (대진대학교 중앙도서관)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.20
  • 심사 : 2018.09.06
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 기존 리더십의 대안적인 개념인 공유 리더십, 진정성 리더십, 셀프 리더십이 대학도서관 사서들의 조직유효성 인식에 미치는 영향을 규명하는 것이다. 그리고 이러한 리더십 유형 중 어떤 리더십이 조직유효성 인식에 더 큰 영향을 미치는지, 각 리더십과 조직유효성의 관계에서 감성지능의 조절효과가 있는가에 대해 검증해 보고자 하는 것이다. 전국의 대학도서관 중 10인 이상의 정규직 사서가 근무하는 55개 대학도서관 사서 275명을 대상으로 140부의 설문지를 회수하여 분석하였다. 독립변인인 대안적 리더십과 조직유효성과의 영향 관계에서는 부분적으로 유의미한 관계가 도출되었고, 각 리더십의 종속변인에 대한 영향 차이에서는 셀프 리더십이 직무만족에 가장 큰 영향을 미쳤으며, 감성지능의 조절효과에 관한 검증 결과 공유 리더십과 조직유효성과의 관계에서 부분적인 조절효과가 나타나는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 리더십과 조직유효성의 영역에 새로운 개념과 사실을 주장하고 있지는 않지만, 문헌정보학 분야에서 비교적 연구되지 않았던 대안적 리더십에 대한 새로운 개념들에 대해 이론적 관계를 도입하는 기여를 하고 있다고 볼 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of shared leadership, authenticity leadership, and self - leadership on the recognition of organizational effectiveness of university librarians, which is an alternative concept of existing leadership. The purpose of this study is to examine whether leadership styles have more influence on recognition of organizational effectiveness, and whether there is a moderating effect of emotional intelligence on the relationship between leadership and organizational effectiveness. A total of 140 questionnaires were collected from 275 librarians of 55 university librarians working in the university libraries nationwide. The effect of alternative leadership, which is an independent variable, on organizational effectiveness was partially derived, and self - leadership had the greatest effect on job satisfaction, and control effect of emotional intelligence The results of this study are as follows. Although this study does not claim new concepts and facts in the field of leadership and organizational validity, it can be said that it contributes to introducing the theoretical relation to new concepts of alternative leadership which has not been relatively studied in the field of linguistic informatics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Shin, Yookeun. 2005. Management for human respect. Seoul : Dasan.
  2. Lee, SooJung and Yoon, Jeongkoo. 2012. Effects of employees' perceptions of CSR Legitimacy on their citizenship behaviors: The role of moderation by CEO's visionary Leadership. Korea Knowledge Management Society, 13(4):31-54. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2012.13.4.003
  3. Lee, Jeonggeun, 2012. The relationship between the type of leadership and organizational effectiveness. Ph.D.diss.Department of Education Graduate School, Changwon National University.
  4. Chung, Kyooyup and Kim, Wondong. 2008. The Effect of Emotional Intelligence on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Turnover Intention of Hotel Employees: Moderating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Foodservice Management, 11(4): 419-444.
  5. Cha, Hyunju. 2017. A Study on the meaning and Application of Alternative Leadership in University Libraries. Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(1): 253-270. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2017.28.1.253
  6. Korea Eduction and research Information Service. 2016. 2016 Statistical Analysis of University Libraries. Daegu
  7. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. 2005. "Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership." Leadership Quarterly, 16: 315-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social Psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  9. Carmeron, K.S. 1980. "Critical question in assessing organizational effectiveness". Organizational Dynamics, 9(2): 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90041-8
  10. Carson, J. B., Marrone, J. A. & Telsuk, P. E. 2007. "Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance." Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1217-1234.
  11. Dalton, D.R., Todor, W.D., Spendolini, M.J., Fielding, G.J. & Porter, L.W. 1980. "Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review". Academy of Management Review, 5(1): 49-64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1980.4288881
  12. Elloy, D. F. 2005. "The influence of super leader behaviors on organization commitment: job satisfaction and organization self-esteem in a self-managed work team." Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 26: 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510582554
  13. Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
  14. Hiller, N. J., Day, D., & Vance, R. J. 2006. "Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study." Leadership Quarterly, 17(4): 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004
  15. Jordan, J. 2012. "Appearances do matter: Leadership in crisis." Leader to leader, 66: 16-20.
  16. Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  17. Manz, C.C. 1992. Mastering Self-leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Exellence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
  18. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. 2002. "The relative influence of vertical vs shared leadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change management teams." Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2): 172-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
  19. Shamir, B. & Eilam, G. 2005. "What's your story: A life-story approach to authentic leadership development." The Leadership Quarterly. 16: 395-417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.005