Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Chracteristics of School Library Program Employing Taxonomy and CIPP Model

택소노미와 CIPP 모형을 활용한 학교도서관 우수프로그램의 특징 분석

  • 강지혜 (동덕여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.20
  • Accepted : 2018.09.04
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed nineteen best-practices (161 sub-programs) regarding school library media program. The authors conducted content analysis based on The Library Media Specialist's Taxonomy and the CIPP Model. In the analysis of taxonomy showing the degree of involvement of librarian teachers, Level Seven indicating a concerted effort to promote school library program was the most important (37.6%). Among the ten levels of taxonomy, the highest level (levels 6 to 10, high involvement of librarians) accounted for 65.9%. According to the analysis of the CIPP Model, (Context) most of the excellent programs were aimed at reading education (41.5%) and library use education (11.3%), and more than half (53.8%) cases were initiated by learners' needs. (Input) excellence programs employed various teaching materials and were operated at fixed time. (Process) the programs were run in a variety of ways, mainly with reading instruction (30.4%) and cultural activities (17.3%). (Product) As a fruit of programs, students and parents' satisfaction, students' achievement, self-confidence, and self-improvement were reported.

본 연구에서는 각종 도서관 평가에서 선정된 우수사례 가운데 학교도서관 우수 프로그램 19건 (세부프로그램 161건)을 분석하였다. The Library Media Specialist's Taxonomy와 CIPP 모형을 기준으로 콘텐츠 분석을 시행하였다. 사서교사가 프로그램에 관여하는 정도를 나타내는 택소노미 분석에서는 학교의 구성원이 도서관을 이해하고 활용하는 7단계가 37.6%로 가장 큰 비중을 차지하였다. 택소노미의 10 단계 가운데 상위단계 (6~9단계, 사서교사의 관여도가 높음)가 65.9%의 비중을 차지하였다. CIPP 모델을 통해 분석한 결과, (상황) 대부분의 우수 프로그램은 독서교육(41.5%)과 도서관 이용법 교육(11.3%)을 목적으로 하고 있었으며 학습자의 요구로 시작된 사례가 과반(53.8%)을 넘었다. (투입) 우수 프로그램은 다양한 교재교구를 활용하였으며 고정된 시간에 운영되었다. (과정) 프로그램은 다양한 방법으로 운영되었는데, 독서교육(30.4%)과 문화활동(17.3%)이 주를 이루었다. (산출) 프로그램 운영 결과, 학생과 학부모의 만족도와 학생들의 성취도 향상과 프로그램 효과성이 보고되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Bong-Suk, 2018. "A Study on Improvement Plan of Teacher Librarians' Placement by a Comparison between Teacher Librarian and Other Teachers Not-teaching the Subject Matter." Journal of The Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.2.027
  2. Ministry of Education and Korea Educational Development Institute. 2017. Library Stat us. Statistical Analysis of Educational Materials - Statistics on the Elementary and Secondary Education. Sejong: Ministry of Education and Korea Educational Development Institute. [cited 2018. 8. 20].
  3. Ministry of Education. 2015. Introduction to Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  4. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. 2002. Comprehensive Plan for School Library Activation. Seoul.
  5. Kwon, Eun-Kyung. "A Study on the Current State of Library Assisted Instruction - Through an Analysis of Research Reports of Secondary Schools." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(4): 138-164.
  6. Kim, S., Suh, H.-R. 2017. "An Analytical Study on Research Trends of Reading Programs in School Libraries." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(4), 363-392. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.4.363
  7. Kim, Jong-Sung. 2013. "Trends Analysis of School Library Research in Korea." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(2): 71-91. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.2.071
  8. Kim, Jong-Sung. 2018. School Library Promotion Act Revision and Current Outlook. "Summer Conference on Information Society of Korea." 151-169
  9. Library Information Policy Committee. 2017. National library operation evaluation index of 2017. [cited 2018. 8. 20].
  10. 문화체육관광부. 2014. 제2차 도서관발전종합계획(2014-2018). 세종: 문화체육관광부. [cited 2018. 8. 20].
  11. Park, Ju-Hyeon, Lee, Myoung-Gyu. 2014. "Political Issue and Problem of School Library Education in Korea." Journal of the Korea Society for Library and Information Science, 48(1), 299-328. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.1.299
  12. 성혜미. 2018. 모든 학교도서관에 사서교사.사서 1명 이상 의무배치. 연합뉴스. 8월 14일. [cited 2018. 8. 20].
  13. Jung, Kyoung, Y., Yu, Hyun, C. 2011. "Development of Assessment Criteria for Scientific Technology Education Program by Science Museum Based on CIPP." The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 11(2): 85-103.
  14. Library Act. 2018. No.15167.
  15. School Library Promotion Act. 2018. No.15368.
  16. AASL. 2009. Empowering Learners: Guidelines for School Library Programs. Chicago: ALA.
  17. Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. 2018. "Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study." Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1): 189-206. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553
  18. Loertscher, D. V. 2000. Taxonomies of the school library media program: Michigan Hi Willow Research & Pub.
  19. Stufflebeam, D. L. 2003. The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN), Portland, Oregon.