DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Causes of failed implant attachments and application of double crown implant overdenture in one patient

한 환자에서 실패한 임플란트 부착장치들의 원인과 이중관 임플란트 피개 의치의 적용

  • Kwon, Jae-Uk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 권재욱 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조진현 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2018.07.18
  • Accepted : 2018.09.06
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

In this case, the patient was restored with gold Hader bar mandibular implant overdenture using two implants about 10 years ago, and the retentive force was lost due to severe wear of the bar due to 3.5 years use. The overdenture was repaired using a Locator attachment, but the male part was completely worn after 6.5 years use. Finally, we used a hybrid telescopic double crown with a friction pin to fabricate a new implant overdenture, which was observed for 2 years and showed excellent prognosis. So, we describe the cause of failure of each attachment (Gold Hader bar, Locator) in two implant overdentures and report on the advantages and disadvantages of double crown implant overdenture and the conditions for success.

본 증례의 환자는 약 10여년 전 2개의 임플란트를 이용하여 Gold Hader bar 하악 임플란트 피개 의치로 수복하였고, 3년 6개월의 사용으로 인한 bar의 심한 마모로 유지력을 상실하였다. 이를 Locator 부착장치를 이용하여 하악 피개 의치를 수리하였으나, Locator 사용 6년 6개월 후 male 부위가 완전히 닳은 상태로 내원하게 되었다. 다음으로는 하이브리드 이중관(Hybrid telescopic double crown with friction pin)을 사용하여 임플란트 피개 의치를 새로 제작하였고, 이를 2년동안 관찰한 결과 우수한 예후를 보여주고 있다. 여기에서 한 환자에서 2가지(Gold Hader bar, Locator)방법으로 수복한 임플란트 피개 의치에서 각 부착장치의 실패원인에 대해서 알아보고, 이중관 피개 의치의 장단점과 성공을 위한 조건에 대해서 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1455-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0073
  2. Davis DM, Packer ME. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:222-9.
  3. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van't Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:195-201. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x
  4. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-4.
  5. Krennmair G, Suto D, Seemann R, Piehslinger E. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:481-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02169.x
  6. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:429-40.
  7. Bansal S, Aras MA, Chitre V. Guidelines for treatment planning of mandibular implant overdenture. J Dent Implant 2014;4:86-90. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-6781.131014
  8. Yu JH, Shin SY. Implant supported overdenture using $Locator^{(R)}$ system on mandibular edentulous patient. J Dent Rehab Appl Sci 2012;4:397-406.
  9. Lee BK, Park SH, Lee CH, Cho JH. Implant overdenture impressions using a dynamic impression concept. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:66-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.66
  10. Weber H, Frank G. Spark erosion procedure: a method for extensive combined fixed and removable prosthodontic care. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90144-D
  11. Phillips K, Wong KM. Space requirements for implantretained bar-and-clip overdentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:516-8, 520, 522.
  12. Taylor TD. Indications and treatment planning for mandibular implant overdentures. In: Feine JS, Carlsson GE, eds. Implant overdentures as the standard of care for edentulous patients. Chicago; Quintessence; 2003. p.71-81.
  13. Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular twoimplant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:e69-76.
  14. Carr AB, Brown DT. McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics. In: Chapter 10. Principles of removable partial denture design. 12th ed. CV Mosby; 2010. p. 115-29.
  15. Breitman JB, Nakamura S, Freedman AL, Yalisove IL. Telescopic retainers: an old or new solution? A second chance to have normal dental function. J Prosthodont 2012;21:79-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00797.x
  16. Hoffmann O, Beaumont C, Tatakis DN, Zafiropoulos GG. Telescopic crowns as attachments for implant supported restorations: a case series. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:291-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/0-815.1
  17. Mengel R, Lehmann KM, Metke W, Wolf J, Flores-de-Jacoby L. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of partially edentulous patients with aggressive generalized periodontitis: two case reports. Int J Periodontic Restor Dent 2002;22:129-37.
  18. Eitner S, Schlegel A, Emeka N, Holst S, Will J, Hamel J. Comparing bar and double-crown attachments in implantretained prosthetic reconstruction: a follow-up investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:530-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01500.x
  19. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:195-202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x

Cited by

  1. 심한 치조골 소실이 있는 상악 무치악 환자에서 Pekkton telescopic attachment를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 증례 vol.57, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.189
  2. 하악 Milled Bar 임플란트 피개의치에서 12년 간의 임플란트 주변 치주조직 및 의치의 변화 vol.59, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.55