DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between Corneal Ablation Amount and Intraocular Pressure after Corneal Refractive Surgery

각막굴절교정수술 후 각막절삭량과 안압변화의 상관관계

  • Jung, Mi-A (Dept. of Optometry, Yeoju Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Hee (Dept. of Visual Optics, Far East University)
  • Received : 2018.11.30
  • Accepted : 2018.12.12
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Purpose : The purposes of this study were to evaluate the changes of intraocular pressure according to corneal ablation amount after corneal refractive surgery and the changes of intraocular pressure according to refractive errors before corneal refractive surgery. Methods : The mean age of adults who underwent LASIK corneal refractive surgery were $37.34{\pm}7.42years$, and 108 adults(48 males, 60 females) were participated in this study. Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and corneal ablation amount were measured using an autorefractor, a noncontact tonometer, and an excimer laser. All test values were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Results : The mean intraocular pressure before corneal refractive surgery was $15.08{\pm}2.60mmHg$ in males and $14.16{\pm}2.67mmHg$ in females. The decrease of intraocular pressure after corneal refractive surgery were 4.22mmHg in males and 3.61mmHg in females. Spherical equivalent power were $-3.89{\pm}2.17D$ in males and $-4.45{\pm}2.92D$ in females before corneal refractive surgery, and $-0.10{\pm}0.46D$ in males and $-0.04{\pm}0.46D$ in females after corneal refractive surgery. The corneal ablation amount after corneal refractive surgery were statistically significant, with $53.95{\mu}m$ in males and $61.26{\mu}m$ in females. There was significant correlation between corneal ablation amount and decrease of intaocluar pressure(r=0.2299, p<0.001). As the growth of corneal ablation amount in males, the decrease of intraocular pressure was significantly increased. As the growth of refractive error, the amount of decrease in intraocular pressure was also significant. The decrease of intraocualr pressure were $3.04{\pm}2.18mmHg$ in low refractive error, $4.10{\pm}2.16mmHg$ in middle refractive error, and $4.65{\pm}3.29mmHg$ in high refractive error. Conclusion : We found that intraocular pressure decreased after corneal refractive surgery by noncontact tonometer and the change of intraocular pressure which is an important index for glaucoma diagnosis, may affect the judgment of eye disease. We think that a preliminary questionnaire whether corneal refractive surgery is necessary for the measurement of intraocular pressure.

목적 : 각막굴절교정수술 후 각막절삭량에 따른 안압변화와 수술 전 굴절이상도에 따른 수술 후 안압 변화에 대하여 알아보고자 하였다. 방법 : 라식 각막굴절교정수술을 받은 평균연령 $37.34{\pm}7.42$세, 성인 남녀 108명(남자 48명, 여자60명)을 대상으로 선정하였다. 자동굴절검사기, 비접촉형안압계, 엑시머레이저를 이용하여 굴절이상도, 안압, 각막절삭량을 측정하였으며, p<0.05일 때 통계적으로 유의하다고 판단하였다. 결과 : 각막굴절교정수술 전 안압은 남자가 $15.08{\pm}2.60mmHg$, 여자가 $14.16{\pm}2.67mmHg$로 남자가 여자보다 높게 나타났으며, 각막굴절교정수술 후 안압 감소량은 남자가 4.22mmHg, 여자가 3.61mmHg로 나타났다. 등가구면 굴절력은 각막굴절교정 수술 전 남자 $-3.89{\pm}2.17D$, 여자 $-4.45{\pm}2.92D$에서, 각막굴절교정 수술 후 남자 $-0.10{\pm}0.46D$, 여자$-0.04{\pm}0.46D$로 나타났다. 각막굴절교정수술 후 각막절삭량은 남자 $53.95{\mu}m$, 여자 $61.26{\mu}m$로 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었으며, 각막절삭량과 안압의 감소량에는 유의한 상관성(r=0.2299, p<0.001)을 보였다. 성별로는 남자의 각막절삭량이 많아질수록 안압의 감소량은 유의하게 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 굴절이상도가 증가할수록 안압의 감소량도 커져 경도의 굴절이상도에서는 $3.04{\pm}2.18mmHg$, 중등도의 굴절이상에서는 $4.10{\pm}2.16mmHg$, 고도의 굴절이상도에서는 $4.65{\pm}3.29mmHg$가 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 결론 : 각막굴절교정수술 후 비접촉식 안압계로 측정한 안압은 감소하는 것을 알 수 있었으며, 안압측정은 녹내장 판단에 영향을 줄 수 있으므로 안압 측정시 각막굴절교정수술 여부에 대한 사전설문이 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen Y, Zhao G et al.: Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement using NCT after LASIK. Yan Ke Xue Bao 20(2), 68-70, 2004. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15301097
  2. Cennamo G, Rosa N et al.: Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica 211(6), 341-343, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9380350 https://doi.org/10.1159/000310825
  3. Bashford KP, Shafranov G et al.: Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 50(3), 245-251, 2005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15850813 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.006
  4. Faucher A, Gregoire J et al.: Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 23(6), 832-838, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9292664 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80239-8
  5. Jung SK, Lee SK et al.: Intraocular pressure change by the hemodialysis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 36(12), 2195-2201,1995. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75478068
  6. Najman-Vainer J, Smith RJ et al.: Interface fluid after LASIK misleading tonometry can lead to end-stage glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 26(4), 471-472, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10819625
  7. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI et al.: Assessment of the Pascaldynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 30(4), 746-751, 2004. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15093634 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.033
  8. Hofmeister EM, Bishop FM et al.: Randomized dose-response analysis of mitomycin-C to prevent haze after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 39(9), 1358-1365, 2013. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830559 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.029
  9. Vetrugno M, Quaranta GM et al.: A randomized, comparative study of fluorometholone 0.2% and fluorometholone 0.1% acetate after photorefractive keratectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 10(1), 39-45, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10744204 https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210001000107
  10. Seiler T, Holschbach A et al.: Complications of myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the excimer laser. Ophthalmology 101(1), 153-160, 1994. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8302549 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31371-6
  11. Levy Y, Hefetz L et al.: Refractory intraocular pressure increase after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 23(4), 593-594, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9209999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80221-0
  12. Yamaguchi T, Murat D et al.: Diagnosis of steroid-induced glaucoma after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 24(4), 413-415, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500094 https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20080401-17
  13. Razeghinejad MR, Katz LJ: Steroid-induced iatrogenic glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 47(2), 66-80, 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21757964 https://doi.org/10.1159/000328630
  14. Kim WK, Cho EY et al.: The Incidence of Increased Intraocular Pressure when Using 0.1% Fluorometholone after Photorefractive Keratectomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 56(7), 985-991, 2015. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100899618 https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2015.56.7.985
  15. Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW et al.: The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 104(6), 945-948, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9186434 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30202-4
  16. Koh SI, Kim SD et al.: The effect of the changes in central corneal thickness and curvature on measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 40(9), 2464-2472, 1999. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19718946
  17. Shields MB, Ritch R: Glaucoma, Intraocular Pressure and Tonometry, 2nd ed., St. Louis, Mosby, pp. 407-428, 1996.
  18. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M: Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Refract Surg. 24(4), 366-370, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500086 https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20080401-09
  19. Sanchez-Naves J, Furfaro L et al.: Impact and permanence of LASIK-induced structural changes in the cornea on pneumotonometric measurements: contributions of flap cutting and stromal ablation. J Glaucoma 17(8), 611-618, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19092455 https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181639ae2
  20. Lee KM, Kim MK et al.: Risk Factors of the Steroid Induced Ocular Hypertension After Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 51(10), 1333-1337, 2010. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82398309 https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2010.51.10.1333
  21. Kim WK, Cho EY et al.: Analysis of postoperative intraocular pressure underestimation measured with non contact tonometry after corneal refractive surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 55(2), 167-172, 2014. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99941029 https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2014.55.2.167
  22. Cho HH, Park MH et al.: Comparison of Measured Intraocular Pressure Change According to the Methods of Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 52(3), 308-314, 2011. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82534454 https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2011.52.3.308
  23. Kim H, LEE KJ: Analysis of Factors Affecting Intraocular Pressure after Corneal Refractive Surgery. Korean J Vis Sci. 15(3), 273-285, 2013. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99789845
  24. Hornova J, Sedlak P et al.: Refractive procedures-LASIK and intraocular pressure in myopic eyes. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 56(2), 98-103, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10874788
  25. Lee DH, Seo S et al.: Accuracy and predictability of the compensatory function of Orbscan II in intraocular pressure measurements after laser in situ kerato mileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28(2), 259-264, 2002. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11821207 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01286-X
  26. Cheng AC, Fan D et al.: Effect of corneal curvature and corneal thickness on the assessment of intraocular pressure using noncontact tonometry in patients after myopic LASIK surgery. Cornea 25(1), 26-28, 2006. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16331036 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000164833.69668.02
  27. Fournier AV, Podtetenev M et al.: Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 24(7), 905-910, 1998. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9682108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80041-2
  28. Hong LH, Lee MK et al.: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Correction Programs in Pentacam after Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 54(1), 26-32, 2013. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100524446 https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2013.54.1.26
  29. Shah S: Accurate intraocular pressure measurement-the myth of modern ophthalmology?. Ophthalmology 107(10), 1805-1807, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11013176 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00383-3
  30. Francois J: Corticosteroid glaucoma. Ann Ophthalmol. 9(9), 1075-1080, 1977. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/143229
  31. Lee DH, Kwon OY, Kim JM: The comparison of corneal ablation amount by MEL-60 excimer laser and schwind multiscan excimer laser systems. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 44(5), 1048-1053, 2003. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30067941
  32. Kim TH, Lee DH, Lee HI: The safety of 250 ${\mu}m$ residual stromal bed in preventing keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). J Korean Med Sci. 22(1), 142-145, 2007. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17297268 https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2007.22.1.142
  33. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN: Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 21(3), 228-235, 2001. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11396396 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00581.x
  34. Hsu SY, Chang MS et al.: Intraocular pressure assessment in both eyes of the same patient after laserin situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 35(1), 76-82, 2009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19101428 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.018