Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17337/JMBI.2018.20.4.543

Correlation between Corneal Ablation Amount and Intraocular Pressure after Corneal Refractive Surgery  

Jung, Mi-A (Dept. of Optometry, Yeoju Institute of Technology)
Lee, Eun-Hee (Dept. of Visual Optics, Far East University)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Vision Science / v.20, no.4, 2018 , pp. 543-551 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purposes of this study were to evaluate the changes of intraocular pressure according to corneal ablation amount after corneal refractive surgery and the changes of intraocular pressure according to refractive errors before corneal refractive surgery. Methods : The mean age of adults who underwent LASIK corneal refractive surgery were $37.34{\pm}7.42years$, and 108 adults(48 males, 60 females) were participated in this study. Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and corneal ablation amount were measured using an autorefractor, a noncontact tonometer, and an excimer laser. All test values were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Results : The mean intraocular pressure before corneal refractive surgery was $15.08{\pm}2.60mmHg$ in males and $14.16{\pm}2.67mmHg$ in females. The decrease of intraocular pressure after corneal refractive surgery were 4.22mmHg in males and 3.61mmHg in females. Spherical equivalent power were $-3.89{\pm}2.17D$ in males and $-4.45{\pm}2.92D$ in females before corneal refractive surgery, and $-0.10{\pm}0.46D$ in males and $-0.04{\pm}0.46D$ in females after corneal refractive surgery. The corneal ablation amount after corneal refractive surgery were statistically significant, with $53.95{\mu}m$ in males and $61.26{\mu}m$ in females. There was significant correlation between corneal ablation amount and decrease of intaocluar pressure(r=0.2299, p<0.001). As the growth of corneal ablation amount in males, the decrease of intraocular pressure was significantly increased. As the growth of refractive error, the amount of decrease in intraocular pressure was also significant. The decrease of intraocualr pressure were $3.04{\pm}2.18mmHg$ in low refractive error, $4.10{\pm}2.16mmHg$ in middle refractive error, and $4.65{\pm}3.29mmHg$ in high refractive error. Conclusion : We found that intraocular pressure decreased after corneal refractive surgery by noncontact tonometer and the change of intraocular pressure which is an important index for glaucoma diagnosis, may affect the judgment of eye disease. We think that a preliminary questionnaire whether corneal refractive surgery is necessary for the measurement of intraocular pressure.
Keywords
Corneal refractive surgery; Corneal ablation amount; Intraocular pressure; Refractive error; Glaucoma;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bashford KP, Shafranov G et al.: Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 50(3), 245-251, 2005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15850813   DOI
2 Chen Y, Zhao G et al.: Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement using NCT after LASIK. Yan Ke Xue Bao 20(2), 68-70, 2004. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15301097
3 Najman-Vainer J, Smith RJ et al.: Interface fluid after LASIK misleading tonometry can lead to end-stage glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 26(4), 471-472, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10819625
4 Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI et al.: Assessment of the Pascaldynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 30(4), 746-751, 2004. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15093634   DOI
5 Hofmeister EM, Bishop FM et al.: Randomized dose-response analysis of mitomycin-C to prevent haze after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 39(9), 1358-1365, 2013. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830559   DOI
6 Vetrugno M, Quaranta GM et al.: A randomized, comparative study of fluorometholone 0.2% and fluorometholone 0.1% acetate after photorefractive keratectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 10(1), 39-45, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10744204   DOI
7 Seiler T, Holschbach A et al.: Complications of myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the excimer laser. Ophthalmology 101(1), 153-160, 1994. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8302549   DOI
8 Levy Y, Hefetz L et al.: Refractory intraocular pressure increase after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 23(4), 593-594, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9209999   DOI
9 Hornova J, Sedlak P et al.: Refractive procedures-LASIK and intraocular pressure in myopic eyes. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 56(2), 98-103, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10874788
10 Yamaguchi T, Murat D et al.: Diagnosis of steroid-induced glaucoma after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 24(4), 413-415, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500094   DOI
11 Hong LH, Lee MK et al.: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Correction Programs in Pentacam after Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 54(1), 26-32, 2013. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100524446   DOI
12 Lee DH, Seo S et al.: Accuracy and predictability of the compensatory function of Orbscan II in intraocular pressure measurements after laser in situ kerato mileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28(2), 259-264, 2002. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11821207   DOI
13 Cheng AC, Fan D et al.: Effect of corneal curvature and corneal thickness on the assessment of intraocular pressure using noncontact tonometry in patients after myopic LASIK surgery. Cornea 25(1), 26-28, 2006. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16331036   DOI
14 Fournier AV, Podtetenev M et al.: Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 24(7), 905-910, 1998. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9682108   DOI
15 Shah S: Accurate intraocular pressure measurement-the myth of modern ophthalmology?. Ophthalmology 107(10), 1805-1807, 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11013176   DOI
16 Francois J: Corticosteroid glaucoma. Ann Ophthalmol. 9(9), 1075-1080, 1977. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/143229
17 Lee DH, Kwon OY, Kim JM: The comparison of corneal ablation amount by MEL-60 excimer laser and schwind multiscan excimer laser systems. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 44(5), 1048-1053, 2003. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30067941
18 Hsu SY, Chang MS et al.: Intraocular pressure assessment in both eyes of the same patient after laserin situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 35(1), 76-82, 2009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19101428   DOI
19 Kim TH, Lee DH, Lee HI: The safety of 250 ${\mu}m$ residual stromal bed in preventing keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). J Korean Med Sci. 22(1), 142-145, 2007. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17297268   DOI
20 Montes-Mico R, Charman WN: Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 21(3), 228-235, 2001. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11396396   DOI
21 Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW et al.: The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 104(6), 945-948, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9186434   DOI
22 Koh SI, Kim SD et al.: The effect of the changes in central corneal thickness and curvature on measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 40(9), 2464-2472, 1999. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19718946
23 Shields MB, Ritch R: Glaucoma, Intraocular Pressure and Tonometry, 2nd ed., St. Louis, Mosby, pp. 407-428, 1996.
24 Kirwan C, O'Keefe M: Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Refract Surg. 24(4), 366-370, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500086   DOI
25 Razeghinejad MR, Katz LJ: Steroid-induced iatrogenic glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 47(2), 66-80, 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21757964   DOI
26 Sanchez-Naves J, Furfaro L et al.: Impact and permanence of LASIK-induced structural changes in the cornea on pneumotonometric measurements: contributions of flap cutting and stromal ablation. J Glaucoma 17(8), 611-618, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19092455   DOI
27 Lee KM, Kim MK et al.: Risk Factors of the Steroid Induced Ocular Hypertension After Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 51(10), 1333-1337, 2010. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82398309   DOI
28 Kim WK, Cho EY et al.: Analysis of postoperative intraocular pressure underestimation measured with non contact tonometry after corneal refractive surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 55(2), 167-172, 2014. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99941029   DOI
29 Cho HH, Park MH et al.: Comparison of Measured Intraocular Pressure Change According to the Methods of Corneal Refractive Surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 52(3), 308-314, 2011. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82534454   DOI
30 Kim H, LEE KJ: Analysis of Factors Affecting Intraocular Pressure after Corneal Refractive Surgery. Korean J Vis Sci. 15(3), 273-285, 2013. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99789845
31 Kim WK, Cho EY et al.: The Incidence of Increased Intraocular Pressure when Using 0.1% Fluorometholone after Photorefractive Keratectomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 56(7), 985-991, 2015. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100899618   DOI
32 Jung SK, Lee SK et al.: Intraocular pressure change by the hemodialysis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 36(12), 2195-2201,1995. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75478068
33 Cennamo G, Rosa N et al.: Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica 211(6), 341-343, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9380350   DOI
34 Faucher A, Gregoire J et al.: Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 23(6), 832-838, 1997. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9292664   DOI