DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impacts of Project Governance, Agency Conflicts on the Project Success : From the Perspective of Agency Theory

프로젝트 거버넌스가 대리인 갈등 및 프로젝트 성공에 미치는 영향 : 대리인 이론 관점

  • 정은주 (SK주식회사 PMO팀) ;
  • 김보람 (한양대학교 일반대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 정승렬 (국민대학교 비즈니스 IT 전문대학원)
  • Received : 2018.08.06
  • Accepted : 2018.09.18
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

Recently companies have increased the new projects to improve and innovate the business process in order to adopt the advanced technologies such as IoT (Internet of Things), Big Data Analysis, Cloud Computing, mobile and artificial intelligence technologies for sustainable competitive advantages under rapid technological and socioeconomic external environmental changes. However, there are obstacles to achieve the project goals, corporate's strategy and objectives due to various kind of risks based on characteristics of projects and conflicts of stakeholders participated on projects. Hence, the solutions are required to resolve the various kind of risks and conflicts of stakeholders. The objectives of this study are to investigate the impact of the project governance, agency conflicts on the project success based on agency theory by using the statistical hypothesis testing the relationship among those variables. As a result of hypothesis testing, we could find that the project governance impacts positively on project success and negatively on the agency conflicts. Further, the agency conflicts impacts negatively on the project success. Finally, we could find that the agency conflicts such as goal conflict, different risk attitude and information asymmetry between project manager and team members impact negatively on the project success. Meanwhile, the project governance impact positively on the project success, negatively impact on the agency conflicts such as goal conflict, different risk attitude and information asymmetry between project manager and project team members. In order to increase the project success rate, the project governance institutions such as PGB (Project Governance Board), EPMO (Enterprise Project Management Office), PSC (Project Steering Committee) are needed to prevent or reduce the agency conflicts between project manager and team members.

Keywords

References

  1. Baccarini, D., The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success, Project Management Journal, 1999, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
  2. Ceric, A., The principal-agent theory and the role of project managers in construction : guidelines for future research, Joint CIB International Symposium, 2012, Vol. 2, pp. 26-29.
  3. Eisenhardt, K.M., Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review, The Academy of Management Review, 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
  4. Garland, R., Project Governance : A practical guide to effective project decision making, London and Philadelphia : KOGAN PAGE, 2009.
  5. ISO 21500, Guidance on Project management, 2012.
  6. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H., Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  7. Jeong, E.J. and Jeong, S.R., A Checklist for Assessment of Risks Involved in IT Service Project Contract, Journal of Korean Society for Internet Information, 2014, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 57-65.
  8. Jeong, E.J. and Jeong, S.R., Development and Application of a Stage-Gate Process to Reduce The Underlying Risks of IT Service Projects, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2016, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 270-277.
  9. Jeong, E.J., Bae, J.H., and Jeong, S.R., Guidelines Aimed at Reducing the Risks of User Acceptance Delay in the Context of an IT Service Project Management Plan, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 2015, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 832-839.
  10. Jeong, E.J., The Impacts of Project Governance, Agency Conflicts and Stage-Gate Process on the Project Success : From the Perspective of Agency Theory [dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : Kookmin University, 2017.
  11. Joslin, R. and Muller, R., Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts, International Journal of Project Management, 2015, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1377-1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005
  12. Khan, K., Turner, R., and Maqsood, T., Factors that influence the success of public sector projects in Pakistan, 2013, Conference Paper.
  13. Lee, S.C., An Effect of Agency Problems and Corporate Governance Structure on the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings, Journal of management accounting research, 2008, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-37.
  14. Pinto, J.K., Project management, governance, and the normalization of deviance, International Journal of Project Management, 2014, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.004
  15. PMI, Governance of Portfolios, Programs, and Projects : A Practice Guide(PMBOK GUIDE), 2016, PMI global standard.
  16. Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., and Maltz, A.C., Project Success : A Multidimensional Strategic Concept, Long Range Planning, 2001, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 699-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8
  17. Tuner, R., Huemann, M., Anbari, F., and Bredillet, C., Perspectives on Projects, LONDON and NEWYORK : Routledge, 2010.