DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Burkholderia contaminans on Postharvest Diseases and Induced Resistance of Strawberry Fruits

  • Wang, Xiaoran (College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University) ;
  • Shi, Junfeng (College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Rufu (College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2018.02.01
  • Accepted : 2018.05.25
  • Published : 2018.10.01

Abstract

This study takes strawberry-fruits as the test material and discusses the effect of Burkholderia contaminans B-1 on preventing postharvest diseases and inducing resistance-related substances in strawberry-fruits. Soaking and wound inoculating is performed to analyze the inhibitory effects of different treatment solutions on the gray mold of postharvest strawberry-fruits. The count of antagonistic bacteria colonies in the wound is found, and the dynamic growth of antagonistic bacteria and the pathogenic fungus is observed by electron microscopy. The results indicated that, either by soaking/wound-inoculating, the fermentation and suspension of antagonistic bacteria significantly reduced the incidence of postharvest diseases of strawberry-fruits. With wound inoculation, the inhibition rate of antagonist fermentation and suspension ($1{\times}10^{10}cfu/ml$) respectively reached 77.4% and 66.7%. It also led to a significant increase in the activity of resistance-related enzymes, i.e., phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), 4-coumarate coenzyme A ligase (4CL), cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H) and chalcone isomerase (CHI). On 1 d and 2 d post-treatment, the activity of 4CL was respectively 3.78 and 6.1 times of the control, and on 5 d, the activity of PAL was increased by 4.47 times the control. The treatment of antagonistic bacteria delayed the peaking of cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) activity and promoted the accumulation of lignin and total phenols. The antagonistic bacteria could be well colonized in the wounds. On 4-5 d post-inoculation, the count of colonies was $10^8$ times of that upon inoculation. Electronmicroscopy indicated that the antagonistic bacteria delayed the germination of pathogenic spores in the wounds, and inhibited further elongations of the mycelia.

Keywords

References

  1. Adikaram, N. K. B., Joyce, D.C. and Terryc, L. A. 2002. Biocontrol activity and induced resistance as a possible mode of action for Aureobasidium pullulans against grey mould of strawberry fruit. Aust. Plant Pathol. 31:223-229. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP02017
  2. Ahuja, I., Kissen, R. and Bones, A. M. 2012. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 17:73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.002
  3. Bi, Y., Tian, S. Zhao, J. and Ge, Y. 2005. Harpin induces local and systemic resistance against Trichothecium roseum in harvested hami melons. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 38:183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.05.012
  4. Bi, Y., Li, Y. and Ge, Y. 2007. Induced resistance in postharvest fruits and vegetables by chemicals and its mechanism. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 3:1-7.
  5. Chen, F. H., Zhang, M. Z. and Wu, G. B. 2014. Study of lignification's delaying and its relationship with energy metabolism in loquat fruits after nitric oxide fumigation. Sci. Agric. Sinica 47:2425-2434.
  6. Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C. J., Reddy, M. S. S. and Wang, L. J. 2010. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence-a genomics perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 3:371-390.
  7. Dokoozlian, N. K., Ebisuda, N. C. and Neja, R. A. 1998. Surfactants improve the response of grapevines to hydrogen cyanamide. HortScience 33:857-859.
  8. Droby, S., Vinokur, V., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Goldschmidt, E. E. and Porat, R. 2002. Induction of resistance to Penicillium digitatum in grapefruit by the yeast biocontrol agent Candida oleophila. Phytopathology 92:393-399. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.4.393
  9. Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D. and Wilson, C. 2009. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 52:137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009
  10. Fan, C. F., Bi, Y., Wang, Y. F., Ren, Y. L., Yang, Z. M. and Wang, Y. 2012. Effect of salicylic acid dipping on postharvest diseases and phenylpropanoid pathway in muskmelon fruits. Sci. Agric. Sinica 45:584-589 (in Chinese).
  11. Garcia, M. A., Martino, M. N. and Zaritzky, N. E. 1998. Plasticized starch-based coatings to improve strawberry (Fragaria ${\times}$ ananassa) quality and stability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:3758-3767. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980014c
  12. Ghaouth, A. E., Wilson, C. and Wisniewski, M. 2004. Biologically-based alternatives to synthetic fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables. In: Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: Volume II, ed. by S. A. M. H. Naqvi, pp. 511-535. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  13. Goffner, D., Joffroy, I., Grima-Pettenati, J., Halpin, C., Knight, M. E., Schuch, W. and Boudet, A. M. 1992. Purification and characterization of isoforms of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase from eucalyptus xylem. Planta 188:48-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01160711
  14. Hofstein, R. and Fridlender, B. 1994. Development of production, formulation and delivery systems. In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference 1994: Vol.1: Pests and Diseases, pp. 1273-1280. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK.
  15. Ippolito, A., Elghaouth, A., Wilson, C. L. and Wisniewski, M. 2000. Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defense responses. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 19:265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00104-6
  16. Jamet, E. and Fritig, B. 1986. Purification and characterization of 8 of the pathogenesis-related proteins in tobacco leaves reacting hypersensitively to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Mol. Biol. 6:69-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027300
  17. Kim, H. M., Lee, K. J. and Chae, J. C. 2015. Postharvest biological control of Colletotrichum acutatum on apple by Bacillus subtilis hm1 and the structural identification of antagonists. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25:1954-1959. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1507.07100
  18. Lister, C. E., Lancaster, J. E. and Walker, J. R. L. 2015. Developmental changes in enzymes of flavonoid biosynthesis in the skins of red and green apple cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 71:313-320.
  19. Liu, F. J., Tu, K., Shao, X. F., Zhao, Y., Tu, S. C., Su, J., Hou, Y. P. and Zou, X. H. 2010. Effect of hot air treatment in combination with Pichia guilliermondii on postharvest anthracnose rot of loquat fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 58:65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.05.009
  20. Luo, Z., Feng, S., Pang, J., Mao, L., Shou, H. and Xie, J. 2012. Effect of heat treatment on lignification of postharvest bamboo shoots (Phyllostachys praecox f. prevernalis.). Food Chem. 135:2182-2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.087
  21. Mauch-Mani, B. and Slusarenko, A. J. 1996. Production of salicylic acid precursors is a major function of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in the resistance of arabidopsis to Peronospora parasitica. Plant Cell 8:203-212. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.2.203
  22. Pirie, A. and Mullins, M. G. 1976. Changes in anthocyanin and phenolics content of grapevine leaf and fruit tissues treated with sucrose, nitrate, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 58:468-472. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.58.4.468
  23. Sharma, R. R., Singh, D. and Singh, R. 2009. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review. Biol. Control 50:205-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001
  24. Terry, L. A. and Joyce, D. C. 2004. Elicitors of induced disease resistance in postharvest horticultural crops: A brief review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.09.016
  25. Tian, S., Xu, Y., Jiang, A. and Gong, Q. 2002. Physiological and quality response of longan fruit to high $O_2$ or $CO_2$ atmospheres in storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:335-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00153-3
  26. Wang, J., Bi, Y., Wang, Y., Deng, J., Zhang, H. and Zhang, Z. 2014. Multiple preharvest treatments with harpin reduce postharvest disease and maintain quality in muskmelon fruit (cv. Huanghemi). Phytoparasitica 42:155-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-013-0351-8
  27. Wei, Y., Mao, S. and Tu, K. 2014. Effect of preharvest spraying Cryptococcus laurentii on postharvest decay and quality of strawberry. Biol. Control 73:68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.02.016
  28. Wilson, C. L. and Wisniewski, M. E. 1994. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables-theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 192 pp.
  29. Winkel-Shirley, B. 2001. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 126:485-493. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.2.485
  30. Wisniewski, M. E. and Wilson, C. L. 1992. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: Recent advances. HortScience. 27:94-98.
  31. Zhao, Y., Tu, K., Shao, X., Jing, W. and Su, Z. 2008. Effects of the yeast Pichia guilliermondii against Rhizopus nigricans on tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 49:113-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.01.001
  32. Zheng, Y., Sheng, J., Zhao, R., Zhang, J., Lv, S., Liu, L. and Shen, L. 2011. Preharvest L-arginine treatment induced postharvest disease resistance to Botrysis cinerea in tomato fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59:6543-6549. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2000053