한국측량학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.223-233
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-4850(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-260X(eISSN)
한국측량학회 (Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

UAV를 활용한 비행고도별 지적기준점 및 필지경계점 정확도 분석

Accuracy Analysis of Cadastral Control Point and Parcel Boundary Point by Flight Altitude Using UAV

  • Kim, Jung Hoon (Dept. of Daegu-Kyungpook Regional Headquarter, Korea Land and Geospatial InformatiX Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Jun Hyun (Dept. of Spatial Information Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.24
  • 심사 : 2018.08.17
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 지적기준점과 필지경계점에 대하여 무인항공기를 비행고도별로 40m, 100m로 구분하고 정사영상과 GNSS 지상현황측량을 통한 필지경계점 좌표간의 차이를 비교하여 정확도를 제시하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 공간해상도 분석에서 비행고도별 정사영상에 대한 평균오차는 40m일 때 0.024m, 100m일 때 0.034m의 정확도로 나타났고, 비행고도 100m보다 40m에서 공간해상도와 위치 정확도가 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 비행고도에 따른 지형지물별 영상인식의 정확도 분석을 위해 대공표지 없음, 녹색, 적색의 세가지 경우로 구분하여 비교한 결과 적색의 경우 RMSE가 X=0.039m, Y=0.019m, Z=0.055m로 가장 높은 정확도로 나타났다. 셋째, 정사영상과 현장실측을 통한 좌표를 비교한 결과 지적기준점의 경우 전체 RMSE는 X=0.029m, Y=0.028m, H=0.051m로 나타났고, 필지경계점의 경우 X=0.041m, Y=0.030m로 나타났다. 결론적으로 본 연구결과를 토대로 볼 때, 지적측량을 위한 정사영상 관련 법률규정에서 비행고도별 평균오차 0.05m 미만으로 제한한다면, 공간정보취득 뿐만 아니라 지적측량에도 경제적이고 효율적인 방법이 될 것으로 기대한다.

In this study was classified the cadastral control points and parcel boundary points into 40m, 100m by flight altitude of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) which compared the coordinates extracted from the orthophoto with the parcel boundary point coordinates by GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) ground survey. As a results of this study, first, in the spatial resolution analysis that the average error of the orthoimage by flight altitude were 0.024m at 40m, and 0.034m at 100m which were higher 40m than 100m for spatial resolution of orthophotos and position accuracy. Second, in order to analyze the accuracy of image recognition by airmark of flight altitude that was divided into three cases of nothing, green, and red of RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) were X=0.039m, Y=0.019m and Z=0.055m, the highest accuracy. Third, the result of the comparison between orthophotos and field survey results that showed the total RMSE error of the cadastral control points were X=0.029m, Y=0.028m, H=0.051m, and the parcel boundary points were X=0.041m, Y=0.030m. In conclusion, based on the results of this study, it is expected that if the average error of flight altitude is limited to less than 0.05m in the legal regulations related to orthophotos for cadastral surveying, it will be an economical and efficient method for cadastral survey as well as spatial information acquisition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eker, R., Aydin, A., and Hubl, J. (2018), Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based monitoring of a landslide: Gallenzerkogel landslide (Ybbs-Lower Austria) case study, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 190, No. pp. 1-28. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6336-1
  2. Feng, H., Jiang, Z., Xie, F., Yang, P., Shi, J., and Chen, L. (2014), Automatic fastener classification and defect detection in vision-based railway inspection systems, IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 877-888. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2283741
  3. Han, S. (2017), High-resolution and high-definition image acquisition using UAV and high-precision aerial triangulation, Journal of the Korea Society for GeospatIal Information Science, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 101-109. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2017.25.3.101
  4. KCSC. (2014), The Study for Realistic Cadastral Contents Development and Cadastral Resurvey Application of High Quality Image-based Content, No. 2013-27, Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation, Seoul, pp. 27-73.
  5. Kim, D., Song, Y., Kim, Gi., and Kim, C. (2014), A study on the application of UAV for Korean land monitoring, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry, and Cartography, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 29-38. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2014.32.1.29
  6. Kim, Y. (2006), A Study on the Improvement of Public Land Management, Master's thesis, Kon-kuk University, Seoul, Korea, 123p.
  7. Lee, B. (2018), A study of three dimensional DSM development using self-developed drone, Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 46-52. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.1.46
  8. Lee, S., Kim, J., and Um, J. (2017), Accuracy and economic evaluation for utilization of national/public land actual condition survey using UAV images, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 175-185. (in Korean with English abstract)
  9. Park, K. and Hong, I. (2017), A study on the land administration support using the popular rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle, Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 93-100. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.6.1.7
  10. Shin, H., Um, J., and Kim, J. (2017), A study on damage scale tacking technique for debris flow occurrence section using drones image, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry, and Cartography, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 517-526. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7848/KSGPC.2017.35.6.517
  11. Sung, S. and Lee, J. (2016), Accuracy of parcel boundary demarcation in agricultural area using UAV-photogrammetry, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 53-62. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2016.34.1.53
  12. Uysal, M., Toprak, A.S., and Polat, N. (2015), DEM generation with UAV photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler Hill, Measurement, Vol. 73, pp. 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.010
  13. Yeum, C.M. and Dyke, S.J., (2015), Vision-based automated crack detection for bridge inspection, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 759-770. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12141
  14. Yoo, Y., Choi, J., Choi, S., and Jung, S. (2016), Quality evaluation of orthoimage and DSM based on fixed-wing UAV corresponding to overlap and GCPs, Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 3-9. (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Yun, B. and Lee, J. (2014), A study on application of the UAV in Korea for integrated operation with spatial information, Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information System, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 3-9. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7319/KOGSIS.2014.22.2.003

피인용 문헌

  1. 무인항공 영상을 이용한 공간정보 응용 시스템 활용 방안 vol.17, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2019.17.2.201
  2. 노천광산 모니터링을 위한 드론 사진측량의 정확도 및 활용성 평가 vol.17, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2019.17.12.191
  3. 국·공유지 실태조사를 위한 UAV 사진측량의 활용성 검토 vol.24, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2021.24.1.080
  4. 지상기준점 선점 위치에 따른 DSM 높이 정확도 분석 vol.51, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2021.51.1.125