디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권8호
  • /
  • Pages.269-278
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

모바일 게임에서 휴리스틱 유형이 구전속성 및 행동의도에 미치는 영향 - 구전속성을 매개변인으로 -

Influence that Heuristic Type has on Word of Mouth and Behavioral Intention in Mobile Game - Word of Mouth as a Mediator -

  • 김종무 (단국대학교 사회과학대학 커뮤니케이션학부)
  • Kim, Jong-Moo (School of Communications, College of Social Science, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.16
  • 심사 : 2018.08.20
  • 발행 : 2018.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 이용자의 선택에 영향을 미치는 휴리스틱 유형이 구전속성에 미치는 영향과 구전속성이 이용자의 행동의도에 미치는 영향 및 구전속성이 휴리스틱 유형과 행동의도 간에 매개 역할을 할 것인지를 알아보고자, 모바일 게임을 이용하는 102명의 결과를 분석 하였다. 첫째, 휴리스틱(대표성, 조정) 유형은 구전속성(호의성, 신뢰성, 설득성)에 정(+)의 영향력을 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 신뢰성 구전속성은 행동의도에 유의한 영향력을 갖는 것으로 나타났으나, 호의성과 설득성 구전속성은 행동의도에 유의한 영향력을 갖지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 휴리스틱(대표성, 조정) 유형은 행동의도에 유의한 영향력을 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 신뢰성 구전속성만이 조정 휴리스틱 유형과 행동의도 관계에서 매개역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 모바일 게임 시장에서 이용자들이 게임을 선택하는 행동의도를 이해하는데 도움을 제공해 줄 수 있을 것이다.

This study analyzed the outcome of 120 persons who used mobile game in order to investigate the influence that heuristic type which affects users' selection has on word of mouth, the influence that word of mouth has on users' behavioral intention and whether word of mouth will play the role of mediation between heuristic type and behavioral intention or not. First, heuristic(representatives, adjustment) type is found to have positive(+) influence on word of mouth (favorableness, reliance, persuasiveness). Second, while reliance word of mouth is found to have significant influence on behavioral intention, favorableness, persuasiveness and word of mouth is not found to have significant influence on behavioral intention. Third, heuristic (representative, adjustment) type is found to have significant influence on behavioral intention. Fourth, only reliance, word of mouth is found to play the role of mediation in the role of heuristic type and behavioral intention. The outcome of this study will help to understand users' behavioral intention selecting game in mobile game market.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. KOCCA. (2017). 2017 GAME INDUSTRY WHITE PAPER, Seoul : KOCCA.
  2. Y. C. Jeong. (2018). Comparison of online game and mobile game users. http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2015110602101857786001
  3. H. J. Kim, H. S. Pyo & M. J. Han. (2011). Analysis on the Influences and Effects of eWOM (electronic Word of Mouth) of Power Blog Post as a Source of Advertisement. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 13(4), 315-362.
  4. S. H. Lee & Y. K. Jeong. (2016). The effects of eWOM Characteristics on Credibility, eWOM Acceptance and Purchase Intentions. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(9), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.09.545
  5. H. J. Kim & B. J. Choi. (2015). O2O-based Social Media Marketing Method for Word-Of-Mouth Effect : Focused on the Analysis of Case Studies. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 15(7), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.07.403
  6. S. Yi & C. Park. (2015). Factors Influencing e-WOM through SNS: Focus on China Weibo. Journal of international area studies, 19(1), 131-156. https://doi.org/10.18327/jias.2015.04.19.1.131
  7. Psychology Glossary. (2017). Heuristic http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=2070217&cid=41991&categoryId=41991
  8. Y. C. Hwang. (2016). A Study on a Relationship between Behavioral Intention & The Determinants of Heuristic and Type of Heuristics : Focus on Wine Customer. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Resarch, 16(1), 295.
  9. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on psychological science, 3(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x
  10. K. H. Ann & J. S. Gwak. (2011). Consumer decision-making from the perspective of behavioral economics. Seoul. Haghyeonsa.
  11. J. H. Kang. (2018). Study on the heuristic decision making process according to foodservice consumers' WOM acceptance attitude. Doctoral dissertation. Kyonggi University, Kyonggido.
  12. J. F. Engel. R. J. Kegerreis & R. D. Blackwell. (1969). Word of Mouth Communication by The Innovator. Journal of Marketing, 33(July), 18.
  13. R. Ohanian. (1990). Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorser Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 18, 39-52.
  14. H. S. Yun & S. W. Bae. (2011). The Effect of Sender's and Receiver`s Expertise On the Receiver's Attitude about Word-of-Mouth: The Moderating Role of Tie Strength. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 16(2), 83-112.
  15. K. Y. Kim & J. H. Kang. (2016). Study on Cafe Choice Behavior Using Extended Theory of Reasoned Action(ETRA) and Heuristics Theory. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30(1), 83-99.
  16. B. H. Lee, Y. D. Kwak & T. H. Lee. (2014). Effect of Green Management Activities in Hotels on Brand Image and Revisit Intention : Focused on The Moderator Effect of Eco-Friendly Attitude of Customers. JOURNAL OF TOURISM & LEISURE RESEARCH, 26(4), 121-137.
  17. S. S. Mun, Y. Y. Ju & T. S. Rho. (2011). Licensing Effect, the Consumers' Psychological Deviance. Journal of Consumer Studies, 22(1), 219-243.
  18. M. Fishbein & I. Ajzen. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
  19. M. Fishbein & I. Ajzen. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  20. M. S. Kim & N. J. Kim. (2013). A Study of a Customer's Attitude and Behavior toward Low-Carbon Management in Food-Service Industry. Korean Journal of Hospitality & Tourism, 22(4), 195-216.
  21. M. S. Cho & W. S. Cho. (2010), The structural relationship between on-line word of mouth, trust, acceptance of word of mouth and intention of family restaurant visit on the Family Restaurant, Journal of Tourism Management Research, 14(2), 181-199.
  22. N. K. Lee, G. J. Kim & G. I. Byun. (2014). A Study on Married Women's Accepting Process of SNS WOM and Forming Process of Behavioral Intention for Restaurants: Focusing on Busan. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 20(6), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2014.20.6.014014014
  23. S. H. Lee & Y. K. Jeong. (2016), The effects of eWOM Characteristics on Credibility, eWOM Acceptance and Purchase Intentions. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(9), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.09.545
  24. S. W. Park. (2016). A Study on Theory of Planned Behavior and Heuristic Behavioral Intention : Focused on International and Regional Event Participants. JOURNAL OF TOURISM & LEISURE RESEARCH, 28(12), 61-79.
  25. S. H. Kim. (2016). Characteristics of Mobile Game Industry and Market Environment. http://www.futurekorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=34023
  26. M. W. Riley. (1954), Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. Carl I. Hovland Irving L. Janis Harold H. Kelley, American Sociological Review, 19(3), 355-357. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087772
  27. D. K. Lee & T. K. Na. (2016). The Effect of Source Credibility about Online Restaurant Information on Information Usefulness, Acceptance of e-WOM and Behavior Intention. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30(1), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2016.01.30.1.261