DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usability Evaluation by Development of IRIS Type X-ray Collimator

조리개형 X선 콜리메이터의 개발에 따른 유용성 평가

  • 강인석 (한서대학교 보건의료학과) ;
  • 박재윤 (인천기독병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 임청환 (한서대학교 보건의료학과) ;
  • 최재호 (안산대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 정홍량 (한서대학교 보건의료학과)
  • Received : 2018.04.05
  • Accepted : 2018.06.05
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the DAP(Dose Area Product) reduction effect of the newly developed IRIS collimator by measuring the DAP of the Rectangle collimator and the IRIS collimator depending on the field, SID(Source to Image recpetor Distance) change, and AEC mode use. The results were as follows. The IRIS collimator decreased DAP by 34.91, 29.33, and 29.04%, respectively, compared to the Rectangle collimator when the field was increased to $8{\times}8$, $12{\times}12$, $16{\times}16inch$. And also, when the SID was increased to 100, 120 and 140 cm, the IRIS collimator decreased DAP by 10.73, 33.68 and 46.22%, respectively, compared to the Rectangle collimator. In AEC mode and none-AEC mode, DAP in IRIS collimator was reduced by 32.71 and 21.69%, respectively, compared with the Rectangle type. The IRIS collimator can reduce DAP by 29.62% on average compared to Rectangle type, which is statistically significant. These results suggest that the newly developed IRIS collimator can be used in medical field to alleviate radiation exposure.

Keywords

References

  1. An SM, Oh JH, Choi JH, Shin KS, Kim SC. Dose Change according to Diameter Change of the Cone for Dental X-ray Apparatus. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2010;10(3):266-70. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.3.266
  2. Carlton, RR, Adler AM. Principles of Radiographic Imaging,. 4th ed; 2006.
  3. Choi SK. Change of the Scattered Dose by Field Size in X-ray Radiography. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2013;13(13): 198-203
  4. Kwon DM, Kim SS, Kim YK, Kim YL, Kim HK, Kim HT, et al. Analog & Digital PACS Medical Imaging Informatics. Daihaks bookstore; 2001
  5. Kim HS. Development of the diagnostic reference level of pediatric skull radiography. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2012
  6. Journy N, Sinno-Tellier S, Maccia C, et al. Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures. BJR. 2012;85(1012): 433-42 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/30010948
  7. Yoo MK, Kim MS, Lee KJ, Lee J, Beak JM. The optimization method and absorbed dose of L-spine AP by collimation. In Seoul Radiological Technologists Association. 2009; 118-9
  8. Lee JS, Ko SJ. Kang SS. Kim JH. Park HH, Kim D, et al. "Evaluation of image quality for diagnostic digital chest image using ion chamber in the total mastectomy." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2013;13(3): 204-10 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.03.204
  9. Powys R, Robinson J, Kench PL, Ryan J, Brennan PC. Strict X-ray beam collimation for facial bones examination can increase lens exposure. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1016): e497-e505 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19989149
  10. ] Kim YH, Kwon SI. Effects on Patient Exposure Dose and Image Quality by Increasing Focal Film Distance in Abdominal Radiography. Journal of Korean Society of radiological technology. 1998; 21(1): 52-58
  11. Kang EJ, Yoo BG. The Study on the Protection and Actual Condition of Using the Dental X-ray Unit. Journal of Korean Society of radiological technology. 2000;23(2): 43-54.
  12. Granger WE, Bednarek DR, Rudin S. Primary beam exposure outside the fluoroscopic field of view. Med Phys. 1997;24(5): 703-7 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598077
  13. Kwon SM, Kim BS, Park HJ, Kang YH. Variation of Image Quality and Dose by Applying Multi-Leaf Collimator for Digital Mammography. J. Korean Soc. Radiol., 2015;9(7): 535-40. https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2015.9.7.535
  14. Chon KH, Hwang MS, Choi MW, Lee SY, Kim MJ, Yang DI, Lee Gwi-Yeol. A Study of x-ray tube voltage, tube current and dose rate depeding on temperature. The Korea Navigation Institute 2011;15(2): 264-72.
  15. Kang AR, Lee IJ, Ahn SM. Comparison of ESD and Major Organ Absorbed Doses of 5-Year-Old Standard Guidelines and Clinical Exposure Conditions. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 2017;40(3); 355-61 https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.3.01
  16. Joyce, M. McEntee, M. Brennan, P. C. O'Leary, D. Reducing dose for digital cranial radiography: The increased source to the image-receptor distance approach. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2013;44(4): 180-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2013.07.002