DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

모니터링위원회를 통한 작업환경 개선 활성화 방안

Study on the Promoting the Improvement of Work Environment by the Monitoring Committee for Work Environment Measurement

  • 투고 : 2018.06.11
  • 심사 : 2018.06.25
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

Objectives: We analyzed the problems that work environment measurement results don't lead to workplace improvement in the Work Environment Measurement System to propose an alternative. Methods: We reviewed reports and articles written by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency and academic circles to identify the problems in the current Work Environment Measurement System and suggest an alternative. Results: One of the reasons that the Work Environment Measurement has not resulted in workplace improvement is that there were no proper regulating systems for managing the workplace improvement plans or improvement results. Moreover, there are not enough professional manpower in ministry of labor to evaluate the improvement plans and results from the Work Environment Measurement. Therefore, all of the workplace whose Work Environment Measurement results exceed the occupational exposure limit (OEL) should be managed by regional ministry of labor, and outside experts and new system for verifying improvement are needed. Conclusions: To accomplish the purpose of Work Environment Measurement, it is necessary to improve the work environment according to the results of Work Environment Measure. For this, it is necessary for the government to manage the fulfillment of workplace improvement plans and for measurement agencies to secure expertise.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byeon SH, Kim YH, Phy YG, Baek YJ. The improvement for season, cycle, method of workplace environmental measurement in Korea. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. 2008.
  2. Byeon SH, Kim YH. Workplace environmental evaluation of short term exposure limit and ceiling values for chemical substances in Korea. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. 2007.
  3. Choi SJ. Assessment on work environment monitoring program in Korea. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2008;18(4):282-292.
  4. Hong SH. Constitutional limitations of privatization and regulation. Study on The American Constitution. 2010; 21(1):391-431.
  5. Jeong JY, Phee YK, Kim CY, Pangi Kim, Yongchul Kim. A study of the standardization for working environment measurement methods and working measurement institutions assessment. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. 2008.
  6. Kim JM, Won JI, Rho YM, Kim SW, Ki YH et al. Study on the improvement of appropriate interval of work environment measurement. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. 2007.
  7. Kim JY. Actual condition and improvement plan of working environment of workers. Environment and Life. 1996; 11:156-169.
  8. Kim SJ. About Korean economics. Ohmybook. 2012.
  9. Koo CK. Discourses, conflicts, and compromises of privatization: Process of privatization in the German rail, postal, and telecommunication services sectors. Korean Political Science Review. 2012;46(4):219-309. https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2012.46.4.010
  10. Lee BT. Legal term dictionary. Bubmunbooks. 2011.
  11. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Industrial safety and health act. 2017b.
  12. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). The white book for employment and labor(2017). 2017a.
  13. Phi YH. A study on the system of working environment measurement under industrial safety and health act. Environmental Law Review. 2004;26(2):1-17.
  14. Roh KH, Kim NC. A study on the principle of public law control over the privatization of public enterprises. Pusan National University Law Review. 2016;57(1):31-59.
  15. Shin SM. A study on the contracting-out of administration affairs on the viewpoint of administrative law. Soongsil Law Review. 2014;32:81-109.
  16. Shin YC, Park JH, Kim KH, Kang SH, Kam YR et al. A study on the improvement the Korean quality control systems for work environment measurement. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. 2015.