DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimating the Number of Target Workplaces for Work Environment Monitoring using Survey Data among Manufacturing Businesses with More than Five Employees in 2016

5인이상 제조업에서 설문조사를 통한 작업환경측정 대상 사업장의 규모 추정

  • Bahk, Jinwook (Department of Public Health, Keimyung University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Won (Department of Public Health, Keimyung University) ;
  • Yang, Seon-Hee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center) ;
  • Ryu, Hyang Woo (Occupational Health Research Department, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Eun-A (Occupational Health Research Department, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute)
  • 박진욱 (계명대학교 공중보건학과) ;
  • 김승원 (계명대학교 공중보건학과) ;
  • 양선희 (동산의료원 직업환경의학과) ;
  • 류향우 (산업안전보건연구원 직업건강연구실) ;
  • 김은아 (산업안전보건연구원 직업건강연구실)
  • Received : 2018.06.10
  • Accepted : 2018.06.24
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the number and proportion of target workplaces for work environment monitoring and evaluate the implementation rate of work environment monitoring. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted by the Ministry of Employment and Labor between March and May 2017 among 96,295 manufacturing businesses with more than five employees. The response rate was 17.8%. Estimates of the number and proportion of target workplaces for work environment monitoring were calculated as follows: number of workplaces where work environment monitoring was performed in 2016 + exposure rate based on the questionnaire * number of workplaces where work environment monitoring was not conducted. Results: Of the 150,655 total manufacturing businesses with more than five employees, 63,146 are estimated to be subject to work environment monitoring, which accounted for 41.9% of the workplaces. It is estimated that 73.3% of the target workplaces performed work environment monitoring. The number of workers exposed to hazardous substances is estimated to be about 0.7~1.2 million. Conclusions: Information on the distribution of workplaces subject to work environment monitoring and the rate of implementation can be used as baseline information for management and evaluation of the effectiveness of the work environment monitoring system.

Keywords

References

  1. Carey RN, Driscoll TR, Peters S, Glass DC, Reid A, et al. Estimated prevalence of exposure to occupational carcinogens in Australia (2011-2012). Occup Environ Med 2014;71(1):55-62 https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101651
  2. Goldenhar LM, LaMontagne AD, Katz T, Heaney C, Landsbergis P. The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: an overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research team. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43(7):616-622 https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200107000-00008
  3. Kim HJ. Assessing and managing the risks associated with overtime, night work and shift Work. Ministry of Employment and Labor.; 2011. p. 11-66
  4. Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency. User guide to fourth Korean working conditions survey. Ulsan, Korea: Korea occupational safety & Health agency; 2016.
  5. Macdonald W, Driscoll T, Stuckey R, Oakman J. Occupational health and safety in Australia. Ind Health 2012;50(3): 172-179 https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.MS1374
  6. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea(MoHW). Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. User guide to Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2017. Osong , Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018.
  7. Tak S, Davis RR, Calvert GM. Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devicesamong US workers-NHANES, 1999-2004. Am J Ind Med 2009;52(5):358-371 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20690
  8. Williams W. The epidemiology of noise exposure in the Australian workforce. Noise & health. 2013;15:326-331 https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.116578