참고문헌
- 노정혜, 전헌수, 김상현, 이철범, 이준호, 허영숙, 홍성욱, 박주용, 곽지훈, 윤창규 (2016). 학문의 정직성에 관한 명예서약 제도 도입을 위한 정책연구 보고서. 서울대학교 자연과학대학.
- 박주용 (2017). 대학 수업에서부터 시작하는 대한민국 교육개혁. 철학과 현실, 113, 126-150.
- 배수정, 박주용 (2016). 대학 수업에서 누적 동료평가 점수를 활용한 성적 산출 방법의 타당성. 인지과학, 27(2), 221-245.
- 연합뉴스 2014.11.4. 한국 아동 '삶의 만족도' OECD 최하위
- 이현정 (2017). 채점예시답안이 동료평가의 정확성에 미치는 영향, 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
- Ashenafi, M.M. (2017). Peer-assessment in higher education-twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 226-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
- Bligh, D. (1972). What's the use of lectures? Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
- Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
- Bloxham, S., den-Outer, B., Hudson J., & Price, M. (2016). Let's stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 466-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607
- Cho, K., Schunn, C.D., & Wilson, R.W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
- Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL Students' writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.c
- Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
- Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. The Journal of the learning sciences, 19(1), 54-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452876
- Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287
- Finlayson, D.S. (1951). The reliability of the marking of essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(2), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1951.tb02776.x
- Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1509-1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000038268
- Hunter, K., & Docherty, P. (2011). Reducing variation in the assessment of student writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903215842
- Jeffery, D., Yankulov, K., Crerar, A., & Ritchie, K. (2016). How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.987721
- Johnson, R. L., Penny, J., Gordon, B., Shumate, S. R., & Fisher, S. P. (2005). Resolving score differences in the rating of writing samples: Does discussion improve the accuracy of scores? Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(2), 117-146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0202_2
- Joordens, S., Pare, D.E., & Pruesse, K. (2009). peerScholar: An evidence-based online peer-assessment tool supporting critical thinking and clear communication. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on e-Learning (pp. 236-240).
- Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M.L., Lyu, Y., Chung K.S., & Suen, H.K. (2016). Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.999746
- Liu, X., & Li, L. (2014). Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.823540
- Liu, X., li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018
- Park, J. (2017). ClassPrep: A peer review system for class preparation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12390
- Purchase, H., & Hamer, J. (2018). Perspectives on peer-review: Eight years of Aropa. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1359819
- Resnick, L. (1986). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
- Roediger, H. L, Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55. Academic Press.
- Russell J., van Horne, S. V., Ward, A. S., Bettis III, E. A., & Gikonyo, J. (2017). Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12176
- Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
- Schunn, C., Godley, A., & De Martino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1). 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.525
- Singleton-Jackson, J. A., Jackson, D. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2010). Students as consumers of knowledge: Are they buying what we're selling? Innovation in Higher Education, 35(5), 343-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9151-y
- Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009311
- Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in college and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
- Tsai, Y. C., & Chuang, M. T. (2013). Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116(1) 210-221. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.23.PMS.116.1.210-221
- Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262346
- Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merrienboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
- Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 12. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v10n12.2002
- Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education. 11(3-4), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
- Yucel, R., Bird, F. L., Young, J., & Blanksby, T. (2014). The road to self-assessment: Exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students' capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 971-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.880400
- Zheng, L. Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533
피인용 문헌
- 동료의 문제 만들기 과제를 평가하는 과정에서 나타난 예비교사의 주목하기: 순열과 조합을 중심으로 vol.24, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2021.24.1.002