DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학습 발달과정 탐색을 통한 계절의 변화 교육과정 및 교수 계열 제안

A Proposal of Curriculum and Teaching Sequence for Seasonal Change by Exploring a Learning Progression

  • 허재완 (강원대학교 과학교육학부) ;
  • 이기영 (강원대학교 과학교육학부)
  • Heo, Jaewan (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.13
  • 심사 : 2018.06.18
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

이 연구에서는 학습 발달과정을 탐색을 통해 계절의 변화에 대한 교육과정과 교수 계열을 제안하고자 하였다. 학습 발달과정을 알아보기 위해 Wilson (2005)이 제안한 '구인 모델링 방식'의 4가지 단계(구인특화, 평가 문항 개발, 평가 결과 기술, 측정 모델)를 적용하였다. 구인특화 단계에서는 계절의 변화의 하부 구인으로 '계절에 따른 그림자의 길이', '계절에 따른 별자리의 위치', '남반구와 북반구의 계절', '계절에 따른 태양의 일주운동', '계절의 원인과 현상'을 설정하였으며, 선행 연구 결과를 바탕으로 각 하부 구인의 하위 정착점인 수준 1에서 상위 정착점인 수준 4까지를 나타낸 구인구성도를 작성하였다. 평가 문항 개발 단계에서는 구인구성도를 토대로 C-E (choose and explain) 형태의 문항 3개, CR (constructed response) 형태의 문항 2개로 구성된 총 5개의 평가 문항을 개발하였으며, 초, 중, 고등학교 학생 383명을 대상으로 적용하였다. 평가 결과 기술 단계에서는 평가 문항에 대한 학생 응답 결과를 구인구성도를 토대로 범주화하는 과정을 거쳤으며, 이 범주들을 학생 능력에 따라 4수준으로 분류하고 1-4점의 점수를 부여하였다. 측정 모델 단계에서는 Rasch 모델의 부분점수 모형을 적용하여 학생들의 응답 결과를 통해 작성한 학습 발달의 경로가 선행 연구를 기반으로 작성한 구인구성도와 일치하는지 비교하였다. 이를 통해 구인구성도를 수정함으로써 최종적으로 계절의 변화에 대한 가설적인 학습 발달과정을 작성하였다. 최종적으로, 연구 결과를 바탕으로 계절 변화에 대한 교육 과정 개정 방향과 효과적인 교수 계열을 제안하였다.

The purpose of this study was to propose curriculum and teaching sequence for seasonal change by exploring a learning progression. For the purpose, 4 steps of construct modeling approach (specifying construct, item design, outcome space, and measurement model) proposed by Wilson (2005) was applied. In the stage of specifying construct, 'length of shadow according to seasons', 'position of constellation according to seasons', 'seasons of the southern hemisphere and northern hemisphere', 'cause and phenomenon of seasonal change' were selected as the subconstructs of seasonal changes, and constructed a construct map showing the level of development from level 1 to level 4 for each subconstruct based on the results of the previous research. In the item design stage, we developed five assessment items consisting of 3 items in the form of C-E (choose and explain) and two items in the form of CR (constructed response), applied it to 383 elementary, middle and high school students. In the outcome space stage, the students' responses to the assessment items were categorized based on the construct map. The categories were classified into 4 levels according to student ability and scores of 1-4 were given. In the measurement model stage, we applied the partial credit model of the Rasch model and compared whether the learning pathway created from the results of students' response coincides with the construct map. Based on the results of the research, we modified the construct map and finally created hypothetical learning progression on seasonal change. Finally, we proposed an orientation of curriculum amendment and effective teaching sequence for seasonal change.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abell, S., Martini, M, and George, M., 2001, That's what scientists have to do: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1095-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010025049
  2. Alonzo, A.C. and Steedle, J.T., 2009, Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20303
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2001, Atlas of science literacy. AAAS.
  5. Baxter, J., 1995, Children's Understanding of Astronomy and the Earth. Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice, 155.
  6. Bond, T.G. and Fox, C.M., 2007, Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed). Routledge.
  7. Briggs, D.C., Alonzo, A.C., Schwab, C, and Wilson, M., 2006, Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 33-63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_2
  8. Chae, D., 1992, Students' Naive Theories about Change in Seasons. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 13(3), 283-289. (in Korean)
  9. Chae, D., Byun, W., and Son, Y., 2003, A Qualitative Study of Preservice Teachers' Change of Season. Journal of the Korean Elementary Science Education Society, 22(1), 109-120. (in Korean)
  10. Chae, D., 2011, The Investigation of Six Crade Students' Preconceptions about the Cause of Seasonal Change. Journal of the Korean Elementary Science Education Society, 30(2), 204-212. (in Korean)
  11. Chae, D. and Lim, S., 2011, The Analysis of Conception Changes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers for 'Causes of Season Change' with Disproof-Experiment Model. Journal of the Korean Elementary Science Education Society, 30(4), 524-534. (in Korean)
  12. Chung, J., Shim, K., and Kim. H., 2004, The Effect of Using Multimedia Material of Seasonal Change on Middle School Students' Conceptual Changes. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(7), 545-557. (in Korean)
  13. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F.A., and Rogat, A., 2009, Learning progressions in science: An evidence based approach to reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  14. Covitt, B.A., Gunckel, K.L., and Anderson, C.W., 2009, Students' developing understanding of water in environmental systems. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.37-51
  15. Duschl, R., Maeng, S., and Sezen, A., 2011, Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
  16. Gunckel, K.L., Covitt, B. A., Salinas, I., and Anderson, C.W., 2012, A learning progression for water in socioecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 843-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21024
  17. Huynh N., Solem M., and Bednarz S., 2015, A road map for learning progressions research in geography, Journal of Geography, 114, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.935799
  18. Jang, M., Cheong, C., and Jeong, J., 2001, Preconception and Conceptual Change about Season on Elementary School Students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 22(4), 268-277. (in Korean)
  19. Jeong, H., 2005, Effects of metacognitive learning strategy on elementary school students' conception acquisition of seasonal change and self-efficacy. Master's thesis of Busan National University of Education. (in Korean)
  20. Ji, E., & Chae, S., 2000, Theory and practices of Rasch model. Seoul: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa.. (in Korean)
  21. Jung, S. and Lee, Y., 2013, Study on the Conceptual Hierarchy for Seasonal Change. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 34(4), 366-377. (in Korean)
  22. Kali, Y., Orion, N., and Mazor, E., 1997, Software for assisting high-school students in the spatial perception of geological structures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-45.1.10
  23. Kim, N., Yang, I., and Ko, M., 2014, The Relationship between the Mental Model and the Depictive Gestures Observed in the Explanations of Elementary School Students about the Reason Why Seasons change. The Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 7(3), 358-370. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2014.7.3.358
  24. Kim, S., 2012, The Study of Elementary Preservice Teacher's Classes on Seasonal Variation. The Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(3), 245-255. (in Korean)
  25. Kim, S., Yang, I., and Lim, S., 2013, Analysis of Changes in Elementary Students'Mental Models about the Causes of the Seasonal Change. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(5), 893-910. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.893
  26. Lee, K., Dong, H., Choi, W., Kwon, G., Lee, I., and Kim, Y., 2017, Exploring a learning progression for eight core concepts of middle school science using constructed response items in the National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA). Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 382-404. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.382
  27. Lee, K., Maeng, S., Park, Y., Lee, J., and Oh, H., 2016, Validation of learning progressions for Earth's motion and solar system in elementary grades: Focusing on construct validity and consequential validity. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(1), 177-190. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0177
  28. Lee, K. and Park, J., 2017, Exploring a learning progression for integrated process skills in Earth science inquiry. Journal of the Korean Elementary Science Education Society, 38(3), 222-238. (in Korean)
  29. Lim, C. and Jeong, J., 1993, An analysis of contents and problems on astronomical area in the elementary science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(2), 247-256. (in Korean)
  30. Maeng, S. and Lee, K., 2015, Cross-sectional item response analysis of geocognition assessment for the development of plate tectonics learning progressions: rash model. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(1), 37-52. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0037
  31. Maeng, S., Lee, K., Park, Y., Lee, J., and Oh, H., 2014, Development and validation of a learning progression for astronomical systems using ordered multiple-choice items. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 703-718. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0703
  32. Maeng, S., Seong, Y., and Jang, S., 2013, Present states, methodological features, and an exemplar study of the research on learning progressions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 161-180. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.161
  33. Ministry of Education, 2015, 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education. (in Korean)
  34. Mohan, L., Chen, J., and Anderson, C.W., 2009, Developing a multiyear learning progression for carbon cycling in socioecological systems. Journal of research in science teaching, 46(6), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
  35. National Research Council (Etats-Unis). Committee on test design for K-12 science achievement, 2006, Systems for State Science Assessment. National Academies Press.
  36. National Research Council, 2001, Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment.
  37. National Research council, 2007, Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
  38. National Research Council, 2012, A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press., Washington, DC, USA, 358 p.
  39. Oh, J. and Kim, Y., 2006, Preservice elementary teacher mental models about astronomical phenomena: seasons and moon phases. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26, 68-87. (in Korean)
  40. Oh, J., Kang, Y., Lee, H., and Kim, Y., 2006, The Sources of Preservice Secondary Teachers' Explanations about Seasonal Changes Investigated with the Lakatosian Methodology. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 374-389. (in Korean)
  41. Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., and Kali, Y., 1997, Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 129-132. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-45.2.129
  42. Plummer, J.D., 2014, Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 1-45.
  43. Plummer, J.D., Palma, C., Flarend, A., Rubin, K., Ong, Y.S., Botzer, B., and Furman, T., 2015, Development of a learning progression for the formation of the solar system. International Journal of Science Education, 37(9), 1381-1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1036386
  44. Ramadas, J., 2009, Visual and spatial modes in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595763
  45. Seong, Y., Maeng, S., and Jang, S., 2013, A learning progression for water cycle from fourth to sixth graders with ordered multiple-choice items. Journal of the Korean Elementary Science Education Society, 32(2), 139-158. (in Korean)
  46. Trumper, R., 2006, Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts -seasonal changes- at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 879-906. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20138
  47. Wilson, M., 2005, Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 213 p.
  48. Wright, B.D. and Linacre, M., 1994, Reasonable meansquare fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 8: 3. Retrieved, 23(01), 2004.
  49. Yang, S., 2016, A study on geography learning progression applying construct modeling approach: Focus on central place theory. Master's thesis of Korea University. (in Korean)