Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Educational Needs of Learning Supporting Program on the Students' Perception of Current Competencies and Important Competencies

역량 인식을 통한 대학생 학습지원 프로그램의 교육요구도 탐색

  • Eom, Mi-Ri (Center for Teaching and Learning, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Choi, Won-Ju (Center for Teaching and Learning, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Song, Yun-Hee (College of Liberal Arts, Anyang University)
  • 엄미리 (광운대학교 교수학습센터) ;
  • 최원주 (광운대학교 교수학습센터) ;
  • 송윤희 (안양대학교 교양대학)
  • Received : 2018.05.21
  • Accepted : 2018.06.20
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the educational needs of learning supporting program on the students' perception of current competencies and important competencies. The data was collected by using the online type (e-mail survey) and the offline type (printed survey) with survey instrument developed by researcher. Survey instrument was composed of 3 categories and 10 competencies. Collected data was analyzed using the SPSS 21.0 for Windows statistical package. And 159 cases were analyzed finally. The paired t-test was conducted to analyze the difference between importance-performance of students' competencies. The educational needs of learning supporting program were calculated by using the Borich's formula. The findings were as follows: The first, 3 categories and 10 competencies were significant difference exists statistically. The second, The high ranks of the educational needs of learning supporting program were 'Major field knowledge', followed by 'Creativity', 'Problem solving ability', 'Global capability', 'Technology capability' in sequence. The results of this study reflected the authentic needs of students will be used a basic data to establish the curriculum for learning supporting program.

본 연구의 목적은 학습자 역량을 선별, 그 역량에 대한 중요도-수행도 인식 차이를 알아보고, 교육요구도를 분석하여 학습지원 프로그램의 방향성을 제고하고자 함이다. 설문도구를 활용하여 온라인 방식(이메일 발송)과 오프라인 방식(서면 설문)을 병행하여 수합된 159부를 최종 분석에 사용하였다. 기술통계, 대응표본 t-검정(paired t-test), Borich 공식을 활용한 교육요구도 분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 1) 3개 영역, 10개 역량별 역량 중요도와 역량 수행도 인식 차이에 있어 모두 유의미한 결과를 확인하였고, 2) Borich 공식을 활용하여 10개 역량별 전체 교육요구도를 살펴본 결과, '전공분야 지식'이 1순위, '창의성'이 2순위, '문제해결력'이 3순위, '글로벌 역량'이 4순위, '테크놀로지 역량'이 5순위 등의 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 대학생 학습지원 프로그램을 기획 설계하는 측면에서 고려해야 할 학습자의 역량과 교육요구도에 따른 주제의 우선순위를 결정하고, 실행 평가하는 측면에서 프로그램 효과성을 판단하는데 실제적 준거로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. H. Shin. (2018). An Analysis of the Effects of On-Off line Convergence Learning Activities Based on Students' Learning Styles. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.2.085
  2. Y. W. Jeon. (2014). Effects of Undergraduate Students' Individual Variables and College Life on the Changes of Core Competency. Unpublished mater's thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  3. S. J. Lee & K. H. Kim. (2017). The effect of college students' individual traits on learning activity participation. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(11), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.11.249
  4. D. C. McClelland. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. DOI : 10.1037/h0034092
  5. R. L. Jacobs. (1989). Systems theory applied to human resource development. In Gradous, D. B(Ed), Systems theory applied to human resource development: Theory practice monograph. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
  6. L. M Spencer & P. S. M. Spencer. (1993). Competence at Work models for superior performance. New York: Wiley.
  7. DeSeCo (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: executive summary. Available at. ONLINE LEARNING CONSORTIUM. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
  8. A. N. Kim & B. S. Rhee. (2003). An Analytic Study of Identifying Personal and InstitutionalInfluences on the Perceived Development of CoreCompetencies of College Students. Journal of Korean Education, 30(1), 367-392.
  9. M. H. Shon. (2006). Competence, and Everydayness of Practical Knowledge as Its Practical Foundation. The Korean Society for Curriculum Studies, 24(4), 1-25.
  10. M. S. Jin, Y. M. Sohn & H. J. Chu. (2011). A Study on Development Plan of K-CESA for College Education Assessment. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(4), 461-486.
  11. D. I. Kim, H. S. Oh, Y. S. Song, E. Y. Koh, S. M. Park & E. H. Jung. (2009). Exploring students' core competencies in higher education from professors' perspectives: A case study of Seoul National University(SNU). Asian journal of education, 10(2), 195-214. DOI : 10.15753/aje.2009.10.2.007
  12. H. S. You. (2002). The Research on the National Standards of Life Skill and Quality Management for Learning System. Korean Educational Development Institute Reserch Paper (RR 2004-11).
  13. Y. H. Kim, J. S. Chung, C. K. Lee & Y. J. Yi. (2010). An Analysis on Undergraduate Students' Perception of Core Competencies and Educational Needs. Journal of Educational Methodology, 20(4), 1-20.
  14. G. D. Borich. (1980). A Needs Assessment Model for Conducting Follow-up Studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 39-42. DOI : 10.1177/002248718003100310
  15. Y. I. Kim, J. H. Jung, C. S. Lee & M. S. Choi. (2001). Educational Needs Analysis of Elementary Teachers for Technological Literacy. Journal of Korean practical arts education, 14(1), 93-107.
  16. M. J. Park. (2008). Development of Empowerment Scale Instrument and Needs Assessment of Home Economics Teachers' Empowerment. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 20(3), 131-143.
  17. M. R. Eom. (2009). Educational Needs Analysis of Instructional Designers in Korea for Competency Development. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 12(1), 1-23.
  18. S. K. Oh, J. S. Jun & Y. H. Park. (2014). Complementing a Typical Educational Needs Analysis Using a Survey in Setting the Priority of the Needs. Journal of research in education, 53, 77-98.
  19. K. H. Lee. (1995). Core Competence Management. Seoul: Myungjin Books.