한국건설관리학회논문집 (Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)

  • 제19권3호
  • /
  • Pages.61-69
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2005-6095(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-9703(eISSN)
한국건설관리학회 (Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시공책임형 CM 발주방식 공공부문 시범사업 사례를 통한 리스크 도출

Major Risk Factors to Implement CM at Risk Pilot Project on the Public Sector

  • Han, Jonghoon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Kyungtae (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Ahn, Yonghan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.08
  • 심사 : 2018.03.28
  • 발행 : 2018.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현재 국내에서는 지속적으로 제기되어 오던 건설 산업의 문제를 해결하고 건설산업의 선진화 및 발주방식의 다양화를 위하여 시공책임형 CM 발주방식을 도입하였다. 그러나 시공책임형 CM 규정이 신설된지 6년이 지났음에도 불구하고 용역형 CM에 비해 계약금액 실적이 현저히 떨어지고 있으며 공공부문 시공책임형 CM 프로젝트는 전무한 실정이다. 이에 따라 공공부문 시공책임형 CM 발주방식 정착을 위해 현재 한국토지주택공사 발주로 세 개의 시범사업이 진행되고 있으나 아직 시공책임형 CM에 관련한 세부법령이 미비하여 특례를 바탕으로 시행되고 있는 중이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 현재 진행되고 있는 세 개의 시범사업에 참여중인 실무자를 대상으로, 이후 공공부문에서 시공책임형 CM 방식이 정상도입되어 본격적으로 활용될 경우 발생 가능한 리스크를 파악하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 바탕으로 이후 제도 개선 및 법령 제정에 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

The buildings are getting enormous and more complex as well as the requirement of the owner which wants diverse and efficient. Moreover advanced management is necessary for construction services and a new method of delivering project is now required. In order to expand the delivering method and the construction industry, we have to introduced the CM at Risk method. However, despite the fact that six years have passed already the CM at Risk regulation was introduced, the contract amount in significantly lower than that of the CM for fee, and also there is no CM at Risk project in the public sector. As a result, three pilot projects are currently underway for the LH(Korea Land & Housing Corporation) in order to set up a CM at Risk for the public sector. However, detailed regulations related to CM at Risk have not yet been implemented in Korea. Therefore, in this study, I am trying to understand the risks that could incur when practitioners participate in the three pilot projects that are currently underway and employed in the public sector wherein the CM at Risk is normally introduced. Based on the results of this study, It will be able to utilize as a basic data for future CM at Risk delivery system improvement and enactment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byambadorj, T. (2012). "A Study of Factors that Caused 'CM at Risk's Inactivity and Proposal for the System Improvement." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Architecture, Soongsil University. pp. 1-44.
  2. Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. (2013). "Defining best value for construction manager/general contractor projects: The CMGC learning curve." Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 31(4), pp. 04014060-1-04014060-7 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000275
  3. Han, J. H., and Ahn, Y. H. (2017). "A Study of the Comparison on Request of Proposal for Public CM at Risk Project." Proceedings of KICEM Annual Conference, KICEM, pp. 69-70
  4. Kim, C. H., Shim, U. J., Bae, S. I., and Ahn, Y. S. (2012). "A Study on Deduct the Affecting Factors for Effective Adaption of Construction Management at Risk in Domestic." Proceedings of KICEM Annual Congerence, KICEM, pp. 461-462.
  5. Kim, E. J. (2014). "Schemes to Strengthen Competitive Power of Domestic Specialty Construction Contractors by Activating CM at Risk." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK. 16(5), pp. 207-214.
  6. Kim, E. J., and Yu, I. H. (2015). "Suggestions to Improve the System for Introducing CM at Risk System of Specialty Construction Contractors." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 17(2), pp. 129-136.
  7. Kim, J. G., Jung, J. H., and Lee, H. K. (2009). "The Corresponding Plan of Construction Enterprise for the Introduction of CM at Risk." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 11(1), pp. 159-166.
  8. Kim, J. H. (2010). "An Analysis about Factors Affecting Inactiveness of CM at Risk at Korean Construction Industry." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Construction Management, Hanyang University, pp. 1-4.
  9. Kim, Y. S. (2008). "Application of Diverse Construction Management Delivery Systems in the Public Construction Market; Its Effect and Barriers." 建築, AIK, 52(2), pp. 46-52.
  10. Koh, M. H., Kim, Y. S., Kwon, S. W., and Chin, S. Y. (2010). "Feasibility Analysis of Introducing CM at Risk Delivery Method to the Korean Public Construction Industry by Analyzing Attributes of the Projects." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 11(2), pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.2.3
  11. Koo, S. K. (2017). "Risk Factor Assessment for Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract in CM at Risk." M.S. Dissertation, Graduate School, University of Seoul, pp. 1-94.
  12. Lee, C. J., Lee, S. H., and Ahn, Y. H. (2017). "Benchmarking of US General Contractor's Pre- construction Services for a CM at Risk Project to Improve Contractor's Competitiveness." Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, The Korea Institute For Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 21(3), pp. 9-18.
  13. Lee, I. H. (2008). "A Study on Application Plan of Separate Procurement Concept through CM at Risk." M.S. Dissertation, International School of Urban Science, University of Seoul, pp. 10-13.
  14. Lee, K. D. (2015). "A Study on the Analysis of Main Barriers for the Activation of CM at Risk in the Domestic Construction Industry." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyungpook National University. pp. 1-58.
  15. Ministry of Land infrastructure and Transport (Molit). (2017). "Domestic Construction Management Capability in 2017." (Aug. 31, 2017).
  16. Park, K. M. (2016). "A Study on the CM at Risk Business Model using Business Model Canvas." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(3), pp. 23-31. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.3.023
  17. Park, K. M., and Kim, C. D. (2016). "Improvement through Analysis of Current Open Book Policy for the Korean CM at Risk." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(2), pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.2.003
  18. Shin, S. H., Seo, Y. C., Kyu, K. J., and Hyun, C. T. (2003). "An Application of CM at Risk to the Korean Construction Market." AIK 2003 Proceeding, AIK, 23(1), pp. 343-346.
  19. Tulcalz, G. J. (2002). "Owner's Risk-Shifting Boosts CM-at-Risk Firms." Engineering News Record, ENR, 248(23), p. 44.
  20. Yoo, S. K., Choi, S. I., and Son, C. B. (2009). "An Analysis of Capability of CM at Risk in Major Construction Company." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(5), pp. 85-94.