Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2018.19.3.061

Major Risk Factors to Implement CM at Risk Pilot Project on the Public Sector  

Han, Jonghoon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Kim, Kyungtae (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
Ahn, Yonghan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.19, no.3, 2018 , pp. 61-69 More about this Journal
Abstract
The buildings are getting enormous and more complex as well as the requirement of the owner which wants diverse and efficient. Moreover advanced management is necessary for construction services and a new method of delivering project is now required. In order to expand the delivering method and the construction industry, we have to introduced the CM at Risk method. However, despite the fact that six years have passed already the CM at Risk regulation was introduced, the contract amount in significantly lower than that of the CM for fee, and also there is no CM at Risk project in the public sector. As a result, three pilot projects are currently underway for the LH(Korea Land & Housing Corporation) in order to set up a CM at Risk for the public sector. However, detailed regulations related to CM at Risk have not yet been implemented in Korea. Therefore, in this study, I am trying to understand the risks that could incur when practitioners participate in the three pilot projects that are currently underway and employed in the public sector wherein the CM at Risk is normally introduced. Based on the results of this study, It will be able to utilize as a basic data for future CM at Risk delivery system improvement and enactment.
Keywords
CM at Risk; Risk Factor; Public Sector; Pilot Project;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Byambadorj, T. (2012). "A Study of Factors that Caused 'CM at Risk's Inactivity and Proposal for the System Improvement." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Architecture, Soongsil University. pp. 1-44.
2 Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. (2013). "Defining best value for construction manager/general contractor projects: The CMGC learning curve." Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 31(4), pp. 04014060-1-04014060-7   DOI
3 Han, J. H., and Ahn, Y. H. (2017). "A Study of the Comparison on Request of Proposal for Public CM at Risk Project." Proceedings of KICEM Annual Conference, KICEM, pp. 69-70
4 Kim, C. H., Shim, U. J., Bae, S. I., and Ahn, Y. S. (2012). "A Study on Deduct the Affecting Factors for Effective Adaption of Construction Management at Risk in Domestic." Proceedings of KICEM Annual Congerence, KICEM, pp. 461-462.
5 Kim, E. J. (2014). "Schemes to Strengthen Competitive Power of Domestic Specialty Construction Contractors by Activating CM at Risk." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK. 16(5), pp. 207-214.
6 Kim, E. J., and Yu, I. H. (2015). "Suggestions to Improve the System for Introducing CM at Risk System of Specialty Construction Contractors." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 17(2), pp. 129-136.
7 Kim, J. G., Jung, J. H., and Lee, H. K. (2009). "The Corresponding Plan of Construction Enterprise for the Introduction of CM at Risk." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 11(1), pp. 159-166.
8 Kim, J. H. (2010). "An Analysis about Factors Affecting Inactiveness of CM at Risk at Korean Construction Industry." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Construction Management, Hanyang University, pp. 1-4.
9 Kim, Y. S. (2008). "Application of Diverse Construction Management Delivery Systems in the Public Construction Market; Its Effect and Barriers." 建築, AIK, 52(2), pp. 46-52.
10 Koh, M. H., Kim, Y. S., Kwon, S. W., and Chin, S. Y. (2010). "Feasibility Analysis of Introducing CM at Risk Delivery Method to the Korean Public Construction Industry by Analyzing Attributes of the Projects." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 11(2), pp. 3-14.   DOI
11 Koo, S. K. (2017). "Risk Factor Assessment for Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract in CM at Risk." M.S. Dissertation, Graduate School, University of Seoul, pp. 1-94.
12 Lee, C. J., Lee, S. H., and Ahn, Y. H. (2017). "Benchmarking of US General Contractor's Pre- construction Services for a CM at Risk Project to Improve Contractor's Competitiveness." Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, The Korea Institute For Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 21(3), pp. 9-18.
13 Lee, I. H. (2008). "A Study on Application Plan of Separate Procurement Concept through CM at Risk." M.S. Dissertation, International School of Urban Science, University of Seoul, pp. 10-13.
14 Lee, K. D. (2015). "A Study on the Analysis of Main Barriers for the Activation of CM at Risk in the Domestic Construction Industry." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyungpook National University. pp. 1-58.
15 Ministry of Land infrastructure and Transport (Molit). (2017). "Domestic Construction Management Capability in 2017." (Aug. 31, 2017).
16 Park, K. M. (2016). "A Study on the CM at Risk Business Model using Business Model Canvas." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(3), pp. 23-31.   DOI
17 Yoo, S. K., Choi, S. I., and Son, C. B. (2009). "An Analysis of Capability of CM at Risk in Major Construction Company." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(5), pp. 85-94.
18 Park, K. M., and Kim, C. D. (2016). "Improvement through Analysis of Current Open Book Policy for the Korean CM at Risk." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(2), pp. 3-11.   DOI
19 Shin, S. H., Seo, Y. C., Kyu, K. J., and Hyun, C. T. (2003). "An Application of CM at Risk to the Korean Construction Market." AIK 2003 Proceeding, AIK, 23(1), pp. 343-346.
20 Tulcalz, G. J. (2002). "Owner's Risk-Shifting Boosts CM-at-Risk Firms." Engineering News Record, ENR, 248(23), p. 44.