디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.195-203
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

치과용 인상재의 사용 실태에 대한 융합 연구

The convergence study on the use of dental impression materials

  • 투고 : 2018.02.03
  • 심사 : 2018.04.20
  • 발행 : 2018.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 우리나라 치과임상에서 사용되고 있는 치과인상재의 종류 및 채득 방법에 대해 조사해보기 위해 실시되었으며, 설문조사는 전국치과병(의)원 치과의사를 대상으로 기관당 1부씩 자기기입식 방법을 통해 조사하였으며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 20.0을 사용하여 통계 처리하여 분석하였다. 그 결과 인상재의 종류별 진료 내용에서는 대부분의 진료에서 부가중합형 인상재의 사용빈도가 가장 높았다. 인상채득방법은 점도에 분류에 의한 light body와 heavy body를 사용하는 흐름성이 다른 인상재를 한번에 채득하는 방법을 가장 선호하는 것을 확인할 수 있었고, 임플란트 인상채득방법에는 직접법과 간접법 모두 흐름성이 다른 두 가지 고무인상재를 한번에 채득하는 방법이 가장 선호되었다. 일반적인 특성에 따른 주조수복재와 보철물의 인상채득방법에서는 각각 연령과 임상경력에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 본 연구결과는 임상에서 주로 사용되고 있는 인상재의 종류를 파악해보고 치과전문가에게 요구되는 인상재의 선호도에 따른 이론과 실무에 대한 업무개발에 도움이 될 수 있으리라 판단된다.

This study was conducted to investigate the types and methods of dental impression materials used in dental clinics in south Korea, the questionnaire was surveyed by a self-administered method for one dentist in a one dental clinic, the collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 20. The most frequently used addition silicone impression materials were used in most dental treatment. It was confirmed that the method of taking impression materials having different flow properties(light body and heavy body) was most preferred at one time, also, the implant impression taking method was the most preferred for two rubber impression materials with different flow properties, both direct and indirect. There were statistically significant differences in age and clinical experience between the methods of impression taking of casting restorations and prosthetic according to general characteristics. These results are expected to be helpful for the development of theoretical and practical work based on the basic data for impression material development and research and the preference of impression materials required for dental professional in clinical practice.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. R. G. Craig. (1988). Review of dental impression materials. Advances in dental research, 2(1), 51-64. DOI: 10.1177/08959374880020012001
  2. A. Punj, D. Bompolaki & J. Garaicoa. (2017). Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dentanl Clinical North America. 61(4), 779-796. DOI : 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.004
  3. G. D. Hong. (2017). Information Convergence Technology. Seoul : HanKuk Publishing Co. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.12.1
  4. T. A. Imbery, J. Nehring, C. Janus & P. C. Moon. (2010). Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 141(1), 32-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0018
  5. N. A. Nallamuthu, M. Braden & M. P. Patel. (2012). Some aspects of the formulation of alginate dental impression materials-setting characteristics and mechanical proferties. Dental Materials, 28(7), 756-762. DOI : 10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.012
  6. G. H. Johnson & R. G. Craig. (1986). Accuracy and bond strength of combination agar/alginate hydrocolloid impression materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 55(1), 1-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90059-4
  7. M. Taira & Y. Araki. (2002). DTG thermal analyses and viscosity measurements of three commercial agar impression materials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 29(7), 697-701. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00901.x
  8. S. S. Bunek. (2014). Impression materials. The Dental Advisor, 31, 2-5. https://www.dentaladvisor.com/issues/v-31-n-02/
  9. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. (2016). https://emed.mfds.go.kr/#!CECAB01F010
  10. E. R. Batson, L. F. Cooper, I. Duqum & G. Mendonca. (2014). Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 112(4), 770-777. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002
  11. T. Miyazaki & Y Hotta. (2011). CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Australian Dental Journal, 56(1), 97-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01300.x
  12. M. R. Baig, M. M. Buzayan & N. Yunus. (2018). Accuracy of a new elastomeric impression material for complete-arch dental implant impressions. Journal of Investigative Clinical Dentistry. 18 January. DOI : 10.1111/jicd.12320.
  13. H. N. Yoo & K. .H. Kang. (2013). The implementation status of dental treatment infection control standards of dental hygienists, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(12), 649-656. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.649
  14. Y. N. Park. (2017). The study of awareness and performance of Dental hygiene students for infection control during clinical training, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(11), 307-315. DOI :https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.11.307
  15. N. R. Oh, H.K. Kim & M.J. Cho. (2017). The Effects of Recognition of Material Safety Data Sheets in Dental Hygienist, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(2), 215-223. DOI : https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.2.215
  16. D. Y. Liu, F .N. Cader, J. Abduo & J Palamara. (2017). Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept. Journal of Prosthodontocs. Dec 29. DOI : 10.1111/jopr.12733
  17. C. S. Petrie, M. P. Walker & K. Williams. (2005). A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontics, 14(4), 253-262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00051.x
  18. W. Chee & S. Jivraj. (2006). Impression techniques for implant dentistry. British dental journal, 201, 429-432. DOI : 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814118
  19. S. B. Sabiha & K. Sara. (2011). Impression and bite registration materials. The dental advisor, 28, 2-7. https://www.dentaladvisor.com/issues/v-28-n-02/