DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Empirical Study on Effects of Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Orientation of SMEs on Big Data Utilization Intention

중소기업의 동적역량과 기업가지향성이 빅 데이터 활용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구

  • Han, Byung Jae (Dept. of Techno Management, Graduate School, Hoseo University) ;
  • Yang, Dong Woo (Dept. of Techno Management, Graduate School, Hoseo University)
  • 한병재 (호서대학교 일반대학원 테크노경영학과) ;
  • 양동우 (호서대학교 일반대학원 테크노경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.11
  • Accepted : 2018.11.20
  • Published : 2018.11.28

Abstract

In a rapidly changing environment, dynamic resources have become important factors for companies, the use of Big Data come into focus new core value of business but researches on the major resources and capabilities of companies are insufficient. In this study, the effect of dynamic capability and entrepreneurial orientation in the SMEs on the intention of Big Data utilization are explored. For the purpose of empirical analysis, the survey condusted of 364 domestic SMEs to analyze the effect of dynamic capability on the intention of Big Data utilization through entrepreneurial orientation, performed a parallel multi-parameter analysis of using SPSS Win Ver.22.0 and PROCESS macro v3.0. The results of hypothesis testing showing that dynamic resources and entrepreneurial orientation had positive influence intention of big data utilization. For the determinants of Big Data utilization related to AI it provide suggestions thereby improving the understanding of dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation and helping to improve the management of SMEs.

급변하는 환경 속에서 기업은 동적역량이 중요한 요소로 등장하고 빅 데이터의 활용은 비즈니스의 새로운 핵심가치로 부각되고 있으나 기업이 빅 데이터를 활용함에 있어 성과를 창출할 수 있는 기업의 주요자원 및 역량에 대한 연구는 미미한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 빅 데이터 활용의도에 영향을 주는 중소기업의 동적역량과 기업가지향성에 대해 분석하였다. 실증분석을 위해 국내 연구개발을 수반하는 중소기업 364개를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 동적역량이 기업가지향성을 경유하여 빅 데이터 활용의도에 미치는 영향에 대해 SPSS Win Ver.22.0와 PROCESS macro v3.0을 이용하여 병렬다중 매개분석을 수행하였다. 가설검증결과 동적역량은 빅 데이터 활용의도에 정의 영향을 미쳤으며, 기업가지향성은 부분적으로 빅 데이터 활용의도에 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 인공지능과도 연계된 빅 데이터의 활용의 결정요인으로 중소기업의 핵심자원인 동적역량과 기업가지향성에 영향력과 이해도를 높이고 중소기업 경영관리에 도움을 주고자 한다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

Table 1. The demographic characteristics of respondents

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Factor and Reliability analysis

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Correlation coefficients

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Effect of Dynamic Capability on Big Data Utilization Intention

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Effect of Dynamic Capability on Innovativeness

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Effect of Dynamic Capability on Risk taking

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Effect of Dynamic Capability on Proactiveness

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Big Data Utilization Intention

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Indirect effects of opportunity exploration capability on big data utilization intention

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Indirect effects of Resource acquisition capability on big data utilization intention

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Indirect effects of Resource reconfiguration capability on big data utilization intention

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_237_t0011.png 이미지

References

  1. J. I. Oh. (2017). Global hot Issues: Big Data. Journal of Korea Big Data Association, 2(1), 1-3.
  2. J. Y. Lee & K. I. Kim. (2018). An Exploratory Study to Respond to Industry 4.0 Dysfunction in Small and Medium Manufacturers. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(3), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.3.169
  3. J. M. Kim. (2018). Domesyic and foreign comparison and implication in the big data policy. Seoul : KSBI
  4. H. K. Ga. (2014). An empirical study on influencing factors for big data adoption. JungAng University, Seoul.
  5. G. H. Park. (2017). The determinant for the usage of big data in administrative service : mainly on the quality control of data. KeiMyung University, Daegu.
  6. S. Y. Yoon. (2016). A study on the factors that influence the intention to use big data from the perspective of the resource based throry. DanKook University, Seoul.
  7. G. Cepeda & D. Vera. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities : A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 60, 426-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.013
  8. C. E. Helfat & M. A. Peteraf. (2003). The Dynamic Resource‐Based View: Capability Lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
  9. D. Teece. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities :The nature and micro foundations of sustainable enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  10. S. A. Zahra & G.. George. (2002). Absorptive capacity : a review, reconceptualization and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  11. V. Ambrosini & C. Bowman. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?. International Journal of Management Review, 11, 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
  12. S. L. Newbert. (2007). Empirical Research on the Resource‐Based View of the Firm: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research, Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.573
  13. G. Lumpkin & G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  14. M. H. Morris & D. F. Kuratko. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial development within organizations, South-Western Pub.
  15. M. Peneder. (2009). The Meaning of Entrepreneurship: A Modular Concept, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(2). 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-009-0052-7
  16. L. G. Tomatzky & M. Fleischer. (1990). The process of technology innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.
  17. M. Mahrt & M. Scharkow. (2013). The Value of Big Data in Digital Media Research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 57(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761700
  18. S. Y. Yoon. (2016). A study on the factors that influence the intention to use big data from the perspective of the resource based throry. DanKook University, Seoul.
  19. Y. Y. Chen, S. Wang, J. Nevo, L. Jin & W. S. Chow. (2014). IT capability and organization performance:The roles of business process agiluty and environmental factors. European journal of information systems, 23(3), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.4
  20. G. Lumpkin & G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  21. I. J. Jang. (2016). Effects strategic orientation of school orgations have on dynamic capabilities and organizational performance. Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  22. H. K. Ga. (2014). An empirical study on influencing factors for big data adoption. JungAng University, Seoul.
  23. K. S. Lee. (2017). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Open the Window of Dynamyc Opportunity. Kessia Issue Report, Seoul : KESSIA.
  24. D. J. Teece. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of sustainable enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  25. P. A. Pavlou & O. A. El Sawy. (2010). The Third Hand: IT-enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence through Improvisational Capabilities, Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-471. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0280
  26. H. Y. Ching. (2006). The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities with Market Orientation and Resource-based Approaches on NPD Project Performance, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 215-229..
  27. D Miller & P. H. Friesen. (1982). Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102
  28. S. Y. Yoon. (2016). A study on the factors that influence the intention to Use big data from the Perspective of the Resource Based Theory. DanKook University, Seoul.
  29. S. Winter. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
  30. S. Zahra, H. Sapienza & P. Davidsson. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
  31. I. Barreto. (2010), Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of management, 36, 256-280.
  32. H. K. Ga. (2014). An empirical study on influencing factors for big data adoption. JungAng University, Seoul.
  33. K. M. Eisenhardt & J. A. Martin. (2000), Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  34. D. Teece, G. Pisano & A. Shuen. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  35. J. Barney. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  36. J. Barney. (1996), There source-based theory of the firm. Organizational Science, 7(5), 469-496. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.469
  37. I. J. Jang. (2016). Effects strategic orientation of school orgations have on dynamic capabilities and organizational performance. Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  38. Y. J. Lee. (2017). Effects of entrepreneurial orientation and Firms resources on technological innovation performance and ambidextrous innovation; with mediation effect of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of strategical orientation. HoSeo University, Cheonan.
  39. M. Morris & G. Paul. (1987). The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Marketing in Established Firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90012-7
  40. H. Stevenson & J. Jarillo. (1990). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management, Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Issue), 17-27.
  41. D. Miller. (1983). Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  42. J. G. Covin & D. P. Slevin. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
  43. G. H. Park. (2017). The determinant for the usage of big data in administrative service : mainly on the quality control of data. KeiMyung University, Daegu.
  44. S. Y. Yoon. (2016). A study on the factors that influence the intention to Use big data from the Perspective of the Resource Based Theory. DanKook University, Seoul.
  45. S. C. Lee & M. H. Ko. (2018). Exploring the key technologies on next production innovation. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(9), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.9.199
  46. J. H. Ku. (2018). A Study on Adaptive Learning Model for Performance Improvement of Stream Analytics. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(1), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.1.201
  47. W. G. Kang, E. S. Ko, H. R. Lee & J. N. Kim. (2018). A Study of the Consumer Major Perception of Packaging Using Big Data Analysis. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(4), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.4.015