Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis and Improvement Strategies of Academic Achievement of Middle School in Changwon City

창원시 중학교 학력수준 분석 및 개선 방안 모색

  • Received : 2018.09.28
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper analyzed the current level of the middle school academic achievement in Changwon City and explored the ways for improving academic achievement of the middle school in Changwon City. The data used in the analysis were the results of National Assessment of Educational Achievement of middle school students from 2013 to 2016 which was released on the school's information website(www.schoolinfo.go.kr) First, the analysis found that the academic achievement level of the middle school in Changwon City was not higher than those of Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan, where the population size is similar. Second, the level of academic achievement among middle schools in Changwon City differed by year. Third, the level of academic achievement of middle school in Changwon City differed by district. Fourth, the educational achievement gap among middle schools in Changwon City existed by public and private school, as well as by male school, female school, and male and female Middle School. The paper suggested that schools with low ratio of proficient and above achievement levels should look for ways to raise the percentage of proficient and above achievement levels, and schools with higher rates of below basic achievement should make efforts to solve the problem.

이 논문에서는 현재 창원시 중학교의 학력수준을 분석하고, 향후 창원시 중학교 학력수준 개선방안을 탐색하였다. 분석에 활용한 자료는 학교 알리미 사이트(www.schoolinfo.go.kr)에 공개된 2013년도부터 2016년까지의 창원시 중학교 학생들의 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과이다. 분석결과, 첫째, 창원시 중학교의 학력수준은 인구 규모가 비슷한 광주, 대전, 울산광역시의 학력수준보다 높지 않음을 확인하였다. 둘째, 창원시내 중학교 간 학력 수준이 년도에 따라 차이가 있었다. 셋째, 창원시 중학교의 학력 수준은 창원시 구(區)별로 차이가 있었다. 넷째, 창원시 중학교 간 학력 차이는 공 사립별로, 단성(單性)학교와 남녀 공학 간에도 존재하였다. 이러한 분석결과에 근거하여 이 논문에서는 보통학력 이상 비율이 낮은 학교들은 보통학력 이상 비율을 높일 수 있는 방안을 강구해야 하고, 기초학력 미달 학생의 비율이 높은 학교는 무엇보다도 기초학력 미달 학생을 해소하려는 노력을 기울여야 함을 제안하였다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. The Influencing Factors on School Academic Achievement

Table 1. Ratio of proficient and above

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Ratio of below basic

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Number of middle schools of proficient and above by each school year in Changwon

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Number of middle schools of below basic ratio by subject and year in Changwon

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Comparison of Top School and Lowest School in ratio of proficient and above in the subject by Year

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Ratio of proficient and above by district

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Ratio of proficient and above in UICHANG

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Ratio of proficient and above in SEONGSAN

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Ratio of proficient and above in MASANHAPPO

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Ratio of proficient and above in MASANHOEWON

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Ratio of proficient and above in JINHAE

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Ratio of Below Basic by District

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Ratio of proficient and above by Public and Private

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0013.png 이미지

Table 14. Ratio of below basic by Public and Private

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0014.png 이미지

Table 15. The ratio of proficient and above by male and female schools in Changwon City

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0015.png 이미지

Table 16. Ratio of below basic by male and female schools in Changwon

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_153_t0016.png 이미지

References

  1. S. Y. Kim. (2015). 'Building an Educational Administrative System for School Innovation'. The Korean Federation of Teachers' Associations, The Korean Educational Administration Society, and The Korean Society for The Study of Teacher Education. 5.31 Educational Reform and Innovation in School Education.
  2. S. Y. Kim. (2014). 'Strategies for improving kindergarten and elementary and secondary schools in Changwon. Education Research Institute of Kyungnam University, Changwon District Education Support Agency, and Gyeongnam Shinmun (2014.12.23). Education is the only way to improve cities. a collection of papers for the Changwon Educational Development Forum.
  3. S. Y. Kim. (2016) The school improvement strategy from the perspective of "effective schools". The institute for secondary education at Kyungpook National University (2016.6.17). Direction of future education in Korea. A collection of papers for the seminar of leading Scholars.
  4. D. H. Jang. (2017). An Exploratory Study for the Direction and Tasks for Innovating School System in the Intelligent Information Society, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(12), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.127
  5. M. H. Shin. (2018). An Analysis of the Effects of On-Off line Convergence Learning Activities Based on Students' Learning Styles, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.2.085
  6. S. Y. Kim & E. K. Kwon. (2016). An Exploration of ways to improve the Academic achievement level of high schools in Changwon. Changwon City Development Institute.
  7. C. S. Lee, H. R. Son & H. Y. Jang. (2016). Effects of Self-esteem, Aggression and Violence Recognition on the Academic Achievement of Adolescents, Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(7), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.7.29
  8. S. I. Kim. (2015). Sociology of Education. Educaion Science Press. Chapter 9.
  9. Y. H. Kim. (2017). Sociology of Education. Educaion Science Press. Chapter 12.
  10. J. Y. Lee. (2010). An Exploring the Effects of Neighborhood Characteristics on Students' Academic Achievement in Seoul. A Master's thesis, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  11. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2017). An Analysis of the 2018 CSAT Results. Press Release.
  12. S. K. Sung. (2011). A Study on the Gap between Urban and Rural Academic Achievement. Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4).
  13. J. B. Kim & K. O. Yoon. (Trans). (1989). Effective School, Effective Teacher. Educaion Science Press.
  14. Y. K. Kim et al.(Trans). (2001). Reinventing Education. Future Management Institute.
  15. N. S. Cho et al. (2001). Improving the Quality of Korean School Education. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  16. C. J. Lee et al. (2001). An Analysis and improvement strategies of the current state of Korean School Education. Korean Education Development Institute.
  17. J. Y. Eun et al. (2010). An Analysis of Curriculum and Instruction of High-Performing Elementary School. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  18. J. Y. Eun et al. (2011). An Analysis of Curriculum and Instruction of High-Performing Secondary School. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  19. Dong-A Ilbo. (2007). "The classroom is full of hope." Special Report News.
  20. JoongAng Ilbo. (2007.4.10.-28). "The Leadership of Changing Schools". Special Report News.
  21. Information Services of National Assessment of Educational Achievement. https://naea.kice.re.kr