DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technological Commercialization Strategy based on Consumer Preference Analysis of Low-sodium Instant noodle Ramen

저염화 라면의 소비자 선호 분석을 활용한 기술사업화 전략

  • Oh, Sang Ho (Convergence Technology & Management Engineering, Graduate school, Yonsei University) ;
  • Leem, Choon Seong (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 오상호 (연세대학교일반대학원융합기술경영공학과) ;
  • 임춘성 (연세대학교공과대학산업공학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.24
  • Accepted : 2018.12.14
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a technology commercialization strategy by analyzing the consumer preference for low-sodium instant noodle ramen, which has a sodium content of 1,730 mg or less. For the commercialization of such low-sodium ramen, this study examined how much consumers would pay through an analysis of consumer preference by conjoint analysis. This study surveyed 1,004 men and women in their 20 s and 50 s between the ages of 20 and 50 years in Korea using an online survey. If the price of conventional instant noodle ramen is KRW 4,000 (approximately USD 3.57) per 5 packs for one pack of 5 servings in a supermarket, this study surveyed how much more they respondents would pay if the sodium was reduced by 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0%. The study found that if sodium was reduced by 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0%, the respondents would pay as much as KRW 4,180, KRW 4,307, and KRW 4,515, respectively. The attributes of low-sodium instant noodle ramen were examined according to the degree of sodium reduction, vegetable protein ingredients, brand, where to buy and price with each level. The Marginal Willingness To Pay (MWTP) was analyzed as follows. If the sodium content of ramen soup is reduced by 1.0%, the amount that can be paid would be KRW 105.78. Respondents could pay KRW 1,673 more for famous brand ramen than an unknown brand ramen. The study results indicated that when a new product is developed and released, it can be expected to increase sales of the new product by understanding the foreseeable value that consumers could pay for and realize the technological commercialization of the technology.

Keywords

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_f0001.png 이미지

Demographic characteristic and general features of respondents

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_f0002.png 이미지

Levels of Sodium intake

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_f0003.png 이미지

Willing to intake sodium less than normal level

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_f0004.png 이미지

Acceptance of price by sodium sensitivity

Attributes & attributes levels in conjoint survey

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_t0001.png 이미지

Estimated coefficients of attributes

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_t0002.png 이미지

Relative Importance by Attributes

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_t0003.png 이미지

The amount of marginal willingness to pay by attribution in conjoint analysis

SSMHB4_2018_v33n6_523_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Cattin P, Wittink DR. 1982. Commercial use of conjoint analysis, A survey, J. Research Marketing, 46(3):44-53
  2. Chau DU. 2007. Conjoint analysis of consumer's preference of sales factor of organic agricultural products, A case of a housewife in Chonbuk region, J Korean Rural Sociological Society, 17(1):129-15
  3. Green PE, Krieger AM. 1992. An application of a product positioning model to pharmaceutical product, Marketing Science, 11(2):117-132 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.11.2.117
  4. Jung SN. 2008. A study on the sodium intake and dietary performance in patients of general and low salt diet. Master's degree thesis, Yonsei Univ., Korea. pp 6-7.
  5. Kim HM, Lee JY, Chung LN. 2017. Studies of restaurants to identify the selection attributes for solo diners using conjoint analysis. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult. 32(4): 287-294 https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2017.32.4.287
  6. Kim JS, Lee HY. 2005. A study of the predictive validity of conjoint analysis based on respondent's chosen attributes, Korea Marketing Association, 20(3):103-117
  7. Korean Consumer Agency. 2014. Result of ramen quality test. Availablefrom:http://kca.go.kr/brd/m_32/view.do?seq=1693&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=나트륨&srchTp=1&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&pitem=40&page=1
  8. Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2015. Information booklet for sodium replacers by processed foods
  9. Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2015. Enforcement Decree of the Food Sanitation Act. No. 13332. Available from.http://law.go.kr/LSW/nwRvsLsInfoR.do?lsiSeq=170976&lsKndCd=A0002
  10. Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2016. Information booklet for sodium-reduction by traditional fermented foods. pp12
  11. Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2018. Regulation for labels and advertisements of foods. Enforcement Decree of the Food Sanitation Act.PublicNotification No. 2018-424. Available from. http://mfds.go.kr/brd/m_209/view.do?seq=42968
  12. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Korea Centers for Disease Controland Prevention. 2014-2016. National Health Nutrition Examination Survey Report Available from: https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/sub04/sub04_03.do?classType=7
  13. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2017. Korea Health Statistics 2016: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII-1)
  14. Korean Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in food, agriculture and forestry. 2017. R&D investment and performance report of agriculture, forestry, livestock and food Availablefrom: htttp://www.ipet.re.kr
  15. Lee MY. 2015. Storage and quality characteristics of processed food with reduced sodium contents. Doctoral degree thesis,ChungbukNational University, Korea, pp 81-85
  16. Lim JW et al. 2001. Marketing Research Methodology. Beobmunsa, Seoul, Korea
  17. Lim SI, Han KS, Burgess P, Kim JH, Seo KM. 2009. Assessing relative preference for hot/spicy sauces by conjoint analysis, focusing on english consumers. Korean J.Food Culture 24(1): 51-57
  18. Shin HJ, Lee S. 2018. WTP Estimation in low fat pork meat consumption. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult. 33(4): 299-306 https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2018.33.4.299
  19. Yoo HJ. 2016. The effects of concerns on food safety and trust in label information on label use and willingness to pay among Korean consumers. Crisisonomy Vo1. 12 No. 2: 167-177