Figure 1. Framework for analysis of metaphor expression
Figure 2. Correlation between conceptual metaphor structures of light from light source, process that object is seen, and reflection of light
Table 1. Classification of image schema
Table 2. Symbols of main image schema
Table 3. Analysis of elements of systemic functional grammar
Table 4. Questions for asking about light conception
Table 5. Students’ responses to question of the meaning of light source
Table 6. Students’ conceptual metaphor forms about the light from light source
Table 7. Frequency of each conceptual structure about light from light source
Table 8. Students’ conceptual metaphor structure about process of object seen
Table 9. Students’ conceptual metaphor structure about process of object seen
Table 10. Students’ conceptual metaphor structure about process of object seen
Table 11. Frequency of each conceptual structure about process that object is seen
Table 12. Students’ conceptual metaphor structure about reflection of light
Table 13. Frequency of each conceptual structure about light reflection
Table 14. Elementary students’ conceptual understanding structures about light from light source(S), process that object is seen(W), reflection of light(R)
References
- Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20099
- Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substance-like quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 7(2), 1-14.
- Buty, C., & Mortimer, E. F. (2008). Dialogic/authoritative discourse and modelling in high school teaching sequence on optics. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1635-1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701466280
- Chu, H. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary students' stable and unstable optics conceptions using contextualized questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(2), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9472-6
- Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning, 3-15.
- Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. (1999). Domains and image schemas. Cognitive linguistics, 10, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001
- Close, H. G., & Scherr, R. E. (2015). Enacting Conceptual Metaphor through Blending: Learning activities embodying the substance metaphor for energy. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 839-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025307
- Dewell, R. B. (1994). Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5(4), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.351
- Dreyfus, B. W., Geller, B.D., Gouvea, J., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C. & Redish, E. F. (2014). Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10, 1-11.
- Dreyfus, B. W., Gupta, A., & Redish, E. F. (2015). Applying conceptual blending to model coordinated use of multiple ontological metaphors. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5), 812-838. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1025306
- Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Kattmann, U., & Komorek, M. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction-a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 13-38). Rotterdam: Sense
- Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
- Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physic work at university. Research in Science Education, 37, 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9035-4
- Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. UK: Edinburgh University Press.
- Fetherstonhaugh, T., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Students' understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change. Science education, 76(6), 653-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760606
- Fuchs, H. U. (2015). From Stories to Scientific Models and Back: Narrative framing in modern macroscopic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 934-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025311
- Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900290000
- Goldberg, F. M., & McDermott, L. C. (1986). Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror. The Physics Teacher, 24(8), 472-480. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2342096
- Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
- Hoffman, R. R. (1980). Metaphor in science. Cognition and figurative language, 393-423.
- Jeong, J., Cho, S., & Lim, C. (1996). A Study of the Validating Evaluation of Science Curriculum Sequence and Instructional Effectiveness with the Application and Hierachical Analysis of Science Conceptions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(1), 1-12.
- Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Kim, H., Kwon, J., Kim, B., Jeong, J., & Choi, B. (1992). Korean Children's Conceptions about Light. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 12(2), 43-53.
- Kim, Y., Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2013). Korean High School Students' Perception and Understanding of Highly Metaphorical Science Terminologies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(4), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.4.718
- Kim, Y. & Hwang, J. (2016). A method of analysis of gifted students' understanding and creativity development through metaphorical representation about science concepts. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 8(3), 1-14.
- Kwon, K. (2011). Comparison Between Elementary- and Middle-school Students' Conceptions of the Propagation Path of Light and the Consistency of Those Conceptions. SAE MULLI, 61(7), 643-650. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.61.643
- Kwon, S., & Kim, J. (2007). Comparing Misconceptions of Scientifically-Gifted and General Elementary Students in Physics Classes. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 476-484.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
- Lancor, R. (2015). An analysis of metaphors used by students to describe energy in an interdisciplinary general science course. International Journal Of Science Education, 37(5-6), 876-902. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025309
- Lee, I., Hong, J., & Jhun, Y. (2007). Effects of the Classes on the Path of the Light through the Lens Focused on Substantial Concepts for the Elementary School Gifted in Science. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 548-555.
- Marulcu, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Dogan, M. (2013). Can elementary students gather information from concept maps?. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(4), 611-625.
- Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2015). Understanding Starts in the Mesocosm: Conceptual metaphor as a framework for external representations in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 903-933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025310
- Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Shin, S. (2009). A study on Analogy and Metaphor in Science. Korean Semantics, 29, 133-152.
- Won, M. (1999). An Analysis of Characteristics of Scientific Metaphors. Journal of Language Science, 6(1), 59-80.