1 |
Jeong, J., Cho, S., & Lim, C. (1996). A Study of the Validating Evaluation of Science Curriculum Sequence and Instructional Effectiveness with the Application and Hierachical Analysis of Science Conceptions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(1), 1-12.
|
2 |
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
|
3 |
Kim, H., Kwon, J., Kim, B., Jeong, J., & Choi, B. (1992). Korean Children's Conceptions about Light. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 12(2), 43-53.
|
4 |
Kim, Y., Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2013). Korean High School Students' Perception and Understanding of Highly Metaphorical Science Terminologies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(4), 718-734.
DOI
|
5 |
Kim, Y. & Hwang, J. (2016). A method of analysis of gifted students' understanding and creativity development through metaphorical representation about science concepts. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 8(3), 1-14.
|
6 |
Kwon, K. (2011). Comparison Between Elementary- and Middle-school Students' Conceptions of the Propagation Path of Light and the Consistency of Those Conceptions. SAE MULLI, 61(7), 643-650.
DOI
|
7 |
Kwon, S., & Kim, J. (2007). Comparing Misconceptions of Scientifically-Gifted and General Elementary Students in Physics Classes. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 476-484.
|
8 |
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
|
9 |
Lancor, R. (2015). An analysis of metaphors used by students to describe energy in an interdisciplinary general science course. International Journal Of Science Education, 37(5-6), 876-902.
DOI
|
10 |
Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213.
DOI
|
11 |
Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849-877.
DOI
|
12 |
Lee, I., Hong, J., & Jhun, Y. (2007). Effects of the Classes on the Path of the Light through the Lens Focused on Substantial Concepts for the Elementary School Gifted in Science. Elementary Science Education, 25(5), 548-555.
|
13 |
Marulcu, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Dogan, M. (2013). Can elementary students gather information from concept maps?. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(4), 611-625.
|
14 |
Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2015). Understanding Starts in the Mesocosm: Conceptual metaphor as a framework for external representations in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 903-933.
DOI
|
15 |
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
|
16 |
Shin, S. (2009). A study on Analogy and Metaphor in Science. Korean Semantics, 29, 133-152.
|
17 |
Won, M. (1999). An Analysis of Characteristics of Scientific Metaphors. Journal of Language Science, 6(1), 59-80.
|
18 |
Chu, H. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary students' stable and unstable optics conceptions using contextualized questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(2), 238-251.
DOI
|
19 |
Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substance-like quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 7(2), 1-14.
|
20 |
Buty, C., & Mortimer, E. F. (2008). Dialogic/authoritative discourse and modelling in high school teaching sequence on optics. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1635-1660.
DOI
|
21 |
Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning, 3-15.
|
22 |
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. (1999). Domains and image schemas. Cognitive linguistics, 10, 1-32.
DOI
|
23 |
Close, H. G., & Scherr, R. E. (2015). Enacting Conceptual Metaphor through Blending: Learning activities embodying the substance metaphor for energy. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 839-866.
DOI
|
24 |
Dewell, R. B. (1994). Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5(4), 351-380.
DOI
|
25 |
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. UK: Edinburgh University Press.
|
26 |
Dreyfus, B. W., Geller, B.D., Gouvea, J., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C. & Redish, E. F. (2014). Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10, 1-11.
|
27 |
Dreyfus, B. W., Gupta, A., & Redish, E. F. (2015). Applying conceptual blending to model coordinated use of multiple ontological metaphors. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5), 812-838. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1025306
DOI
|
28 |
Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Kattmann, U., & Komorek, M. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction-a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 13-38). Rotterdam: Sense
|
29 |
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
DOI
|
30 |
Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physic work at university. Research in Science Education, 37, 449-467.
DOI
|
31 |
Goldberg, F. M., & McDermott, L. C. (1986). Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror. The Physics Teacher, 24(8), 472-480.
DOI
|
32 |
Fetherstonhaugh, T., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Students' understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change. Science education, 76(6), 653-672.
DOI
|
33 |
Fuchs, H. U. (2015). From Stories to Scientific Models and Back: Narrative framing in modern macroscopic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 934-957.
DOI
|
34 |
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
DOI
|
35 |
Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
|
36 |
Hoffman, R. R. (1980). Metaphor in science. Cognition and figurative language, 393-423.
|