Fig. 1. Geocomposite (Kwak et al., 2013)
Fig. 2. Graphical form of disturbance function (Park et al., 2000)
Fig. 3. Test equipment
Fig. 4. Order of experiment
Fig. 5. Shear stress - shear strain (sea water samples)
Fig. 6. Shear stress - shear strain (fresh water samples)
Fig. 7. Disturbance function(D)/deviatoric plastic strain trajectory (𝜉D): sea water and fresh water with/without geosynthetic
Table 8. A, Z parameter analysis
Fig. 8. A and Z parameters: sea water and fresh water with/without geosynthetic
Table 1. Physical test result
Table 2. Geocomposite properties (Kwak et al., 2013)
Table 3. Standard consolidation tester specification
Table 4. Dynamic interface surface shear tester specification
Table 5. Exam conditions
Table 6. The maximum shear stress value with and without geo-synthetics (sea water samples)
Table 7. The maximum shear stress value with and without geo-synthetics (fresh water samples)
References
- Alanazy, A. S. (1996), Testing and modeling of sand-steel interfaces under static and cyclic loading, Ph.D Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
- Armaleh, S. H. and Desai, C. S. (1990), Modeling include testing of cohesionless soils under disturbed state concept, Report to the NSF, Dept. of Civil Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., Univ. of Arizona, Tuscon, Arizona.
- Kwak, C. W., Park, I. J. and Park, J. B. (2013), "Microscopic Observation on the Chemical and Cyclic-Degradation of Geosythethic-Soil Interface", In Press, Materials Research Innovations.
- Park, I. J., Yoo, J. H. and Kim, S. I. (2000), Disturbed state modeling for dynamic analysis of soil-structure interface, Jouranl of KGS, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 5-13.