한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제9권12호
  • /
  • Pages.217-225
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

흡수역량이 기술혁신역량 및 기술사업화 역량과 경영성과에 미치는 영향

Effects of Absorptive Capacity on Technology Innovation and Commercialization Capacities and Management Performance

  • 김영기 (충북대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 박성택 (성균관대학교 경영학과)
  • Kim, Young-Ki (Department of Management Information Systems, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Seong-Taek (SKK Business School, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.16
  • 심사 : 2018.12.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 흡수역량이 기술혁신역량과 기술사업화역량과 경영성과에 미치는 영향요인을 파악한 연구이다. 본 연구에서는 선행연구를 통해 흡수역량을 탐색적 흡수역량과 활용적 흡수역량으로 구분하고 이를 독립변수 설정하고 기술혁신역량, 기술사업화 역량에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 흡수역량은 기술혁신역량과 기술사업화역량에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기술혁신역량과 기술사업화역량도 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 치미는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 흡수역량이 기업의 혁신에 영향을 미치는 중요 변인임을 확인하였으며, 기업은 본 연구결과를 통해 흡수능력의 중요성을 인식하고 기술혁신전략 수립시에 가이드라인으로 활용이 가능할 것으로 보인다.

This study analyzes the effects of the absorptive capacity on the technology innovation and commercialization capacities and the management performance. Based on previous studies, the absorptive capacity is sub-classified into the exploratory absorptive capacity and the exploitative absorptive capacity, which are set as independent variables, to analyze their effects on the technology innovation and commercialization capacities. In short, the absorptive capacity has positive effects on the technology innovation and commercialization capacities. In addition, the technology innovation capacity and the technology commercialization capacity have positive effects on the management performance. The findings confirm that the absorptive capacity is an important factor impacting on the corporate innovation, and suggest that businesses should recognize the importance of the absorptive capacity as a guideline for developing their strategies for technological innovation.

키워드

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Result of Hypotheses Testing

Table 1. Operationalization of Variables

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Discriminant Validity Analysis

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Correlation between Latent Variable

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Hypotheses Testing

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Result of mediated pathway

OHHGBW_2018_v9n12_217_t0005.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  2. Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 446.
  3. Choi, S. M., Park, S. T., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). A Study on effects of Exploration and Exploitation on Patent Activities and Innovation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(8), 2735-2742. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00486.3
  4. Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Armara. N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation, 26(5/6), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
  5. Todtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (2001). The role of the region for innovation activities of SMEs. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640100800303
  6. Lin, B. W., & Chen, J. S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms. R&D Management, 35(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00380.x
  7. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In Strategic Learning in a Knowledge economy 39-67..
  8. Liao, Y., Su, Z., Chen, Y., Kan, Y., Duan, H., Qiu, Y., & Wang, R. (2003). TD-DFT study on electronic spectrum property for bis (8-hydroxyquinoline) beryllium and its derivatives. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 24(3), 477-480. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0251-0790.2003.03.020
  9. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527456
  10. Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of management review, 32(3), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275513
  11. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of management studies, 46(8), 1315-1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x
  12. Westphal, L. E., Kim, L. & Dahlman, C. J. (1985). Reflections on the Republic of Korea's acquisition of technological capability in N. Rosenberg and C. Frischtak (2eds.), International Technology Tra
  13. Yam, C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F. & Tang, P. Y. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  14. Nevens, T.M., Summe, G.L., & Uttal, B. (1990). Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do. Havard Business Review, 1990, 154-163.
  15. Camison, C. & Lopez, A. V. (2010). An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(8), 853-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011068199
  16. Chen, C., & Huang, J. (2007) How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management: the social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.11.001
  17. Chen, C. J. (2009). Technology Commercialization, Incubator and Venture Capital, and New Venture Performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.003
  18. Mansfield, E. (1972). Contribution of R&D to economic growth in the United States. Science, 175(4021), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4021.477
  19. Acha, V. (2000). The role of technological capabilities in determining performance: the case of the upstream petroleum industry. The DRUID conference of industrial dynamics, Hillerdpd.
  20. Sterlacchini, A. (1999). Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance. Research Policy, 28(8), 819-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00023-2
  21. Robinson, W. T. (1990). Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Management Science, 36(10), 1279-1289. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1279
  22. Fombrun, C.J., & Wally, S. (1989). Structuring small firms for rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(89)90025-6
  23. Covin, J. G., & Covin, T. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879001400406
  24. Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(4), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90011-6
  25. Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00067
  26. Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research policy, 31(8-9), 1349-1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9
  27. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  28. Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.522
  29. Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060510610199
  30. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of product innovation management, 19(2), 110-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1
  31. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New product management for the 1980's. NewYork: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
  32. Kim, S. K., Lee, B. G., & Oh, K. S. (2009). The effect of R&D and technology commercialization capabilities on the innovation performance of Korean it SMEs: The case of direct and indirect recipients of public R&D funding. In Management of Engineering & Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009. Portland International Conference on (1531-1541). IEEE.
  33. Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
  34. Nunnally, J. C. (1987). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  35. Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, 12(2), 284-324.
  36. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  37. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. & Thomson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Useasan Illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
  38. Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/249690
  39. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling, OH University of Arkon Press, Akron.