1 |
Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, 12(2), 284-324.
|
2 |
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
DOI
|
3 |
Barclay, D., Higgins, C. & Thomson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Useasan Illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
|
4 |
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246.
DOI
|
5 |
Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling, OH University of Arkon Press, Akron.
|
6 |
Camison, C. & Lopez, A. V. (2010). An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(8), 853-878.
DOI
|
7 |
Chen, C., & Huang, J. (2007) How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management: the social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 104-118.
DOI
|
8 |
Chen, C. J. (2009). Technology Commercialization, Incubator and Venture Capital, and New Venture Performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 93-103.
DOI
|
9 |
Mansfield, E. (1972). Contribution of R&D to economic growth in the United States. Science, 175(4021), 477-486.
DOI
|
10 |
Acha, V. (2000). The role of technological capabilities in determining performance: the case of the upstream petroleum industry. The DRUID conference of industrial dynamics, Hillerdpd.
|
11 |
Sterlacchini, A. (1999). Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance. Research Policy, 28(8), 819-832.
DOI
|
12 |
Robinson, W. T. (1990). Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Management Science, 36(10), 1279-1289.
DOI
|
13 |
Fombrun, C.J., & Wally, S. (1989). Structuring small firms for rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 107-122.
DOI
|
14 |
Covin, J. G., & Covin, T. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 35-50.
DOI
|
15 |
Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(4), 331-349.
DOI
|
16 |
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Armara. N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation, 26(5/6), 644-664.
DOI
|
17 |
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.
DOI
|
18 |
Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 446.
|
19 |
Choi, S. M., Park, S. T., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). A Study on effects of Exploration and Exploitation on Patent Activities and Innovation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(8), 2735-2742.
DOI
|
20 |
Todtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (2001). The role of the region for innovation activities of SMEs. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(3), 203-215.
DOI
|
21 |
Lin, B. W., & Chen, J. S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms. R&D Management, 35(2), 157-170.
DOI
|
22 |
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In Strategic Learning in a Knowledge economy 39-67..
|
23 |
Liao, Y., Su, Z., Chen, Y., Kan, Y., Duan, H., Qiu, Y., & Wang, R. (2003). TD-DFT study on electronic spectrum property for bis (8-hydroxyquinoline) beryllium and its derivatives. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 24(3), 477-480.
DOI
|
24 |
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833-863.
DOI
|
25 |
Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of management review, 32(3), 774-786.
DOI
|
26 |
Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of management studies, 46(8), 1315-1338.
DOI
|
27 |
Westphal, L. E., Kim, L. & Dahlman, C. J. (1985). Reflections on the Republic of Korea's acquisition of technological capability in N. Rosenberg and C. Frischtak (2eds.), International Technology Tra
|
28 |
Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
DOI
|
29 |
Yam, C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F. & Tang, P. Y. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140.
DOI
|
30 |
Nevens, T.M., Summe, G.L., & Uttal, B. (1990). Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do. Havard Business Review, 1990, 154-163.
|
31 |
Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.
DOI
|
32 |
Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research policy, 31(8-9), 1349-1367.
DOI
|
33 |
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
|
34 |
Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369-388.
DOI
|
35 |
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of product innovation management, 19(2), 110-132.
DOI
|
36 |
Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New product management for the 1980's. NewYork: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
|
37 |
Kim, S. K., Lee, B. G., & Oh, K. S. (2009). The effect of R&D and technology commercialization capabilities on the innovation performance of Korean it SMEs: The case of direct and indirect recipients of public R&D funding. In Management of Engineering & Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009. Portland International Conference on (1531-1541). IEEE.
|
38 |
Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
|
39 |
Nunnally, J. C. (1987). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
|