References
- 권순각, 김성우, 박유현 (2013). 지속적인 기업체 연계 프로젝트기반의 캡스톤 설계 운영시스템. 공학교육연구, 16(3), 61-68.
- 김영민, 서혜애, 박종석 (2013). 잘 알려진 창의적 과학자들의 과학적 주제 선정 패턴 분석, 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), 1285-1299. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2013.33.7.1285
- 김은경 (2013). 창의적 공학설계, 서울: 한빛아카데미.
- 박경선 (2014). 공학교육에서의 팀티칭기반 융합프로젝트중심 교수학습모형의 개발, 공학교육연구, 17(2), 11-24.
- 변문경, 조문흠 (2016). 공대 학생들의 프로젝트 주제 선정을 위한 초기 교수학습 지원 방안 탐구. 공학교육연구, 19(1), 37-46.
- 신재현, 이홍. (2014). 창의성 발현을 위한 구조화된 문제해결 절차, 약인가, 독인가?. 인사조직연구, 22, 103-139.
- 이요한, 조현정 (2015). 산학협력이슈 BRIEF 2015-4, 창의.융합 지향형 공학교육혁신 전략-공학교육혁신센터중심, 한국산업기술진흥원.
- 이태식, 전영준, 이동욱, 장병철 (2009). 공과대학 캡스톤 디자인 (창의적 공학설계) 교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사. 공학교육연구, 12(2), 36-50.
- 조일현 (2010). 대학 프로젝트 수업 환경에서 분업화, 상호작용, 공유정신모형이 팀 수행성과와 개인 학습에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 26(3), 1-20.
- 조준동(2015). 창의융합 프로젝트 아이디어 북, 서울: 한빛아카데미.
- Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications 7E. New York : Worth publishers.
- Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001
- Bailin, S. (Ed.). (2012). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Capraro R. M., Capraro M. M., & Morgan J. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, SENSE PUBLISHERS, USA.
- Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2006). The use of instructional interventions: Lean learning environments as a solution for a design problem. Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory, 185-200.
- Davis, G. A. (2004). Creativity is forever. Kendall: Hunt Publishing Company.
- Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504858
- Getzels, J. W., & Smilansky, J. (1983). Individual differences in pupil perceptions of school problems. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 307-316.
- Hotaling, N., Fasse, B. B., Bost, B. F., Hermann, C. D., Forest, C. R. (2012). A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01122.x
- Jarvela, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., ... & Jarvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1
- Moore, R. (2006). Taking action: Assessing the impact of preservice teaching on learning. Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2006.10463419
- Palmer, S., Hall, W. (2011). An evaluation of a project based learning initiative in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.593095
- Robert M. C., Mary M. C., & James R. M. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning, An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, SENSE PUBLISHERS, USA.
- Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40-76). Norwood: Ablex.
- Sharples, M., de Roock, R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., ... & Weller, M. (2016). Innovating pedagogy 2016: Open university innovation report 5.
- Walsh, E., Anders, K., Hancock, S., & Elvidge, L. (2013). Reclaiming creativity in the era of impact: Exploring ideas about creative research in science and engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1259-1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.620091
- Zacher, H., & Johnson, E. (2015). Leadership and creativity in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1210-1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881340