Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Success Factors of Corporate Knowledge Management on Business Fidelity and Organization Performance: focusing on the mediating effect of organizational learning

기업의 지식경영 성공요인이 직무충실도 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향 : 조직학습의 매개효과를 중심으로

  • 정명선 (목원대학교 지식재산학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.10
  • Accepted : 2017.11.03
  • Published : 2017.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, due to the continuous changes in the business environment and increased competition, enterprises are introducing technology management to increase their value and enhance their competitiveness. In this study, based on the structural equations model, we investigated the effects of the core success factors of knowledge management on job fidelity and organizational performance and the mediating effects of organizational learning. In addition, organizational culture and information technology and process were assumed to be the key factors affecting knowledge management, and organizational learning was represented by experimental learning, indirect learning, and shared learning. As a result, it was found that knowledge management positively affects business fidelity and organizational performance and, even when it is mediated by organizational learning, it positively affects business fidelity and organization performance directly or indirectly. Therefore, we were able to confirm the importance of utilizing knowledge management in companies and to suggest an appropriate application scope for applying knowledge management and organizational learning.

최근 경영환경이 지속적으로 변화되고 과열 경쟁이 이루어지게 되면서, 기업은 시대에 대처하기 위하여 지식경영을 도입하여 기업의 가치 증대 및 경쟁력 강화를 유도하고자 하고 있다. 지식경영은 새로운 지식을 창조하고, 창조된 지식을 조직 전 영역에 확산시키고 이를 통해 상품이나 서비스, 시스템으로 형상화하는 것으로 지식을 기반으로 하는 기업운영방식을 말하는데, 본 연구에서는 구조방정식모형을 바탕으로 지식경영 핵심성공요인이 직무충실도 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향과 그 관계에서 조직학습의 매개효과에 대해 알아보았다. 또한 지식경영에 미치는 주요 핵심요인으로 조직문화, 정보기술, 프로세스를 활용하였으며, 조직학습은 실험학습, 간접학습, 공유학습으로 유형화하여 분석하였다. 그 결과에 의하면, 지식경영은 직무충실도 및 조직성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 조직학습을 매개로 하여 직 간접적으로 직무충실도와 조직성과에 긍정적인 영향을 주는 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 기업에서 지식경영 활용의 중요성을 확인할 수 있었으며, 기업이 지식경영 및 조직학습을 적용하는데 있어 적절한 적용범위를 제시할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. T. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business Press, 1998.
  2. R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, An evolutionary theory of economic change, harvard university press, 2009.
  3. L. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi and K. Umemoto, "A theory of organizational knowledge creation," Int. J. Technol. Manage., 11, pp. 7-8, 833-845, 1996.
  4. L. Edvinsson and P. Sullivan, "Developing a model for managing intellectual capital," European management journal, 14, 4, pp. 356-364, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(96)00022-9
  5. A. J. DiBella, E. C. Nevis and J. M. Gould, "Understanding organizational learning capability," Journal of management studies, 33, 3, pp. 361-379, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x
  6. R. Ruggles, "The state of the notion: Knowledge management in practice," Calif. Manage. Rev., 40, 3, pp. 80-89, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165944
  7. J. J. Sviokla, "Knowledge workers and radically new technology," Sloan Manage. Rev., 37, 4, 25, 1996.
  8. M. Schrage, "Shared minds the new technologies of collaboration," 1990.
  9. A. Radding, Knowledge management: Succeeding in the information-based global economy, Computer Technology Research Corp., 1998.
  10. J. Jang and H. Lee, "Knowledge architecture for knowledge creating organizational memory," pp. 211-235, 1998.
  11. S. G. Scott and R. A. Bruce, "Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace," Academy of management journal, 37, 3, pp. 580-607, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  12. D. Bawden, "Information systems and the stimulation of creativity," Information Scientist, 12, 5, pp. 203-216, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158601200501
  13. E. H. Schein, "Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning," Glocal Working.Living and Working Across the World With Cultural Intelligence.Milan, Italy, Franco Angeli, pp. 37-58, 2010.
  14. S. Cliffe, Knowledge management-the well-connected business, 1998.
  15. G. Szulanski, "Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm," Strategic Manage. J., 17, S2, pp. 27-43, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
  16. C. C. Lundberg, "On organizational learning: Implications and opportunities for expanding organizational development," Research in organizational change and development, 3, 6, pp. 126-182, 1989.
  17. P. B. Hedberg, How Organizations Learn and Unlearn, w: PC Nystrom, WH Starbuck. Handbook in Organizational Design, 5, 1981
  18. E. W. Tsang, "Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research," Human relations, 50, 1, pp. 73-89, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016905516867
  19. S. K. Kwon, "Organizational learning: A critical review," Korean Journal of Management, 3, 1, pp. 121-164, 1995.
  20. A. H. Maslow, "A theory of human motivation," Psychol. Rev., 50, 4, 370, 1943. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  21. F. Herzberg, The managerial choice: To be efficient and to be human, Irwin Professional Publishing, 1976.
  22. G. A. Brewer and S. C. Selden, "Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies," Journal of public administration research and theory, 10, 4, pp. 685-712, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287
  23. B. S. Georgopoulos and A. S. Tannenbaum, "A study of organizational effectiveness," Am. Sociol. Rev., 22, 5, pp. 534-540, 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2089477
  24. R. P. Tett and J. P. Meyer, "Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings," Person. Psychol., 46, 2, pp. 259-293, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
  25. D. Miller, Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis, Springer, 353, 1989.
  26. J. L. Price and C. W. Mueller, Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees, JAI press, 1986.
  27. K. H. Chung and L. Megginson, "Organization behavior: Developing management skills," 1981.
  28. E. Stavrou, G. Kassinis, & A. Filotheou, Downsizing and stakeholder orientation among the Fortune 500: Does family ownership matter?, Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 2, pp. 149-162, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9162-x
  29. S. P. Brown and R. A. Peterson, "Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: Meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects," J. Market. Res., 30, 1, 63, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172514
  30. W. C. Borman and S. Motowidlo, "Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance," Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71, 1993.
  31. M. A. Khattak, N. Iqbal and S. R. Khattak, "Relationship between employees involvement and organization performance in milieu of pakistan," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3, 1, pp. 219-230, 2013.
  32. K. Vian and R. Johansen, "Knowledge synthesis and computer-based communication systems: Changing behaviors and concepts," 1981.
  33. C. W. Choo and N. Bontis, "Knowledge, intellectual capital, and strategy," The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge, pp. 185-204, 2002.
  34. D. A. Levinthal, "Organizational adaptation and environmental selection-interrelated processes of change," Organization science, 2, 1, pp. 140-145, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.140
  35. J. M. Sinkula, W. E. Baker and T. Noordewier, "A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior," Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 25, 4, pp. 305-318, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003
  36. S. F. Slater and J. C. Narver, "Market orientation and the learning organization," The Journal of marketing, pp. 63-74, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120
  37. B. T. Loher, R. A. Noe, N. L. Moeller and M. P. Fitzgerald, A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction., 1985.
  38. C. Argyris and D. Schon, "Organizational learning: A theory of action approach," Reading, MA: Addision Wesley, 1978.
  39. N. J. Allen and J. P. Meyer, "The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization," J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 63, 1, pp. 1-18, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  40. P. J. Hinds and M. Mortensen, "Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication," Organization science, 16, 3, pp. 290-307, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0122
  41. I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, "Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour," 1980.
  42. R. A. Peterson, "A meta-analysis of cronbach's coefficient alpha," Journal of consumer research, 21, 2, pp. 381-391, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209405
  43. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach," Psychol. Bull., 103, 3, 411, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411