Korean Security Journal (시큐리티연구)

  • Issue 52
  • /
  • Pages.11-40
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2671-4299(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-0644(eISSN)
Korean Security Science Association (한국경호경비학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Female Employment and Prejudice against Women on Justification of Family Violence: A Multi-Level Analysis

여성취업률과 여성에 대한 편견이 가정폭력 정당화에 미치는 영향: 개인과 국가 수준의 위계선형 분석

  • 장초록 (경기대학교 일반대학원 범죄학과) ;
  • 홍명기 (경기대학교 일반대학원 범죄학과) ;
  • 황의갑 (경기대학교 경찰행정학과 (일반대학원 범죄학과))
  • Received : 2017.08.10
  • Accepted : 2017.09.11
  • Published : 2017.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed individual-level and country-level factors affecting justification of domestic violence amid emerging social significance of family violence. For individual-level variables, prejudice against women in economic and social roles were used from the World Value Survey data. As for country-level variables, total of 36 countries were analyzed with indices that represents gender equality such as women's employment rate and democracy index. Women's employment rate was gathered from the Labour Market Database of the World Bank and democracy index was from the Economist Intelligence Unit. Results showed that both individual-level, prejudice against women in economic and social roles and country-level variables such as women's employment rate and democracy index had significant effects on justification of domestic violence. This result implies the importance of creating positive social culture which promotes positive attitudes towards perceptions of gender role and gender equality. As well, country-level endeavors to raise gender equality in employment deem important. Based on these findings, policy implications and recommendations for future research were discussed.

본 연구는 가정폭력의 사회적 중요성이 부각되는 가운데 가정폭력 정당화에 영향을 미치는 개인수준과 국가수준의 요인을 진단하였다. 개인수준의 변수로는 경제적 역할에서의 여성에 대한 편견과 사회적 역할에서의 여성에 대한 편견을 사용하였으며, 국가수준의 변수로는 성불평등에 영향을 주는 여성취업율과 민주주의지수를 고려하였다. 분석에 포함된 국가는 총 36개 국으로 개인수준에서는 세계가치관조사 자료를 사용하였으며 국가수준에서는 국제부흥개발은행의 여성취업률 자료와 경제정보연구소에서 발행한 민주주의지수 등을 활용하였다. 분석결과 개인수준의 변수인 경제적 역할에서의 여성에 대한 편견과 사회적 역할에서의 여성에 대한 편견 모두 가정폭력 정당화에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 국가수준의 변수인 여성취업률과 민주주의지수 또한 가정폭력 정당화에 유의미한 효과를 보이는 것을 알 수 있었다. 개인수준의 왜곡된 성역할 인식과 국가수준의 성불평등이 가정폭력 정당화를 초래할 수 있다는 이러한 결과는 성역할에 대한 긍정적인 사회문화 조성과 국가수준에서의 성 평등에 대한 노력의 중요성을 보여주며 정책적인 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 기광도. (2011). 가정학대경험과 청소년 비행간의 관계분석. 한국경찰연구, 10(4), 93-114.
  2. 김엘림.윤덕경.박현미. (2001). 20세기 여성인권법제사. 한국여성정책개발원.
  3. 김영미. (2012). 복지국가의 가족정책이 성역할 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 비교 분석. 사회보장연구, 28(2), 211-241.
  4. 김은정. (2013). 경호.경비 연구방법론에서 질적 연구의 활용. 한국경호경비학회지, 34, 33-55.
  5. 남인숙. (1999). 민주주의와 우리 사회/여성의 시각에서 본 우리 사회와 민주주의 . 사회이론, 17(단일호), 135-164.
  6. 손덕수. (1990). 서양에서의 성차별인식. 여성문제연구, 18(단일호), 99-117.
  7. 송지원. (2015). 아버지의 휴직사용을 장려하는 스웨덴의 육아휴직제도. 국제노동브리프, 13(6), 78-85.
  8. 유은혜. (2016). 신자유주의, 초국적 사회운동과 여성의 정치적 삶의 질: 여성의 정치적 권능화 지표를 중심으로. 사회과학연구, 42(1), 209-228.
  9. 정윤태.서재욱. (2016). 성역할 태도와 맞벌이 태도의 차이에 관한 연구: 기혼, 유자녀 가구를 중심으로 한 유형화. 한국가족관계학회지, 21(1), 143-160.
  10. Adams, M., & Coltrane, S. (2005). Boys and men in families. Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, 230-248.
  11. Aizer, Anna. (2010). The gender gap and domestic violence. American Economist Review, 100, 1847-1859. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1847
  12. Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  13. Akram, M. B., & Manzoor, B. (2015). Impact of wife battering on the family. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 344.
  14. Anderberg, D., Rainer, H., Wadsworth, J., & Wilson, T. (2013). Unemployment and domestic violence: theory and evidence. IZA Discussion Paper, 7515, 1-37.
  15. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory.
  16. Betancourt, T. S., Newnham, E. A., Layne, C. M., Kim, S., Steinberg, A. M., Ellis, H., & Birman, D. (2012). Trauma history and psychopathology in war‐affected refugee childrenreferred for trauma‐related mental health services in the United States. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25(6), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21749
  17. Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P.H.(2002). Physical and mentalhealth effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7
  18. Davies, P. J., & Dreyer, Y. (2014). A pastoral psychological approach to domestic violence in South Africa. HTS Theological Studies, 70(3), 01-08.
  19. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, 123-174.
  20. Elias, N. (1982). The civilizing process. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  21. Eswaran, M., & Malhotra, N. (2011). Domestic violence and women's autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'economique, 44(4), 1222-1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x
  22. Farris, C. A., & Fenaughty, A. M. (2002). Social isolation and domestic violence among female drug users. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28(2), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1081/ADA-120002977
  23. Haynie, D. L., & Armstrong, D. P. (2006). Race and gender-disaggregated homicide offending rates differences and similarities by victim-offender relations across cities. Homicide Studies, 10(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767905281518
  24. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin.
  25. Howing, P. T., Wodarski, J. S., Kurtz, P. D., Gaudin, J. M., & Herbst, E. N. (1990). Child abuse and delinquency: The empirical and theoretical links. Social Work, 35(3), 244-249.
  26. Huang, C. C., Wang, L. R., & Warrener, C. (2010). Effects of domestic violence on behavior problems of preschool-aged children: Do maternal mental health and parenting mediate the effects?. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.024
  27. Hyde-Nolan, M. E., & Juliao, Tracy. (2012). Theoretical basis for family violence. Family Violence: What Health Care Providers Need to Know, 5-16.
  28. Kharazmi, A., Armanmehr, V., Moradi, N., & Bagheri, P. (2015). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the lifetime prevalence of domestic violence against women in Iran. Asian Women, 31(4), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2015.12.31.4.77
  29. Kilpatrick, D. G., Acierno, R., Saunders, B., Resnick, H. S., Best, C.L., & Schnurr, P. P. (2000). Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: data from a national sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.19
  30. Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of Inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics: international Studies in Gender, State & Society, 7(2), 127-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/7.2.127
  31. Lander, I. (2014). Gender, aging and drug use: A post-structural approach to the life course. British Journal of Criminology, 55(2), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu099
  32. Lee. M. S. (1996). The effects of sex-role attitude and sex-role Identity on the housework sharing and marital satisfaction in dual-earner couples. Journal of Human Science. 16(1). 153-173.
  33. Lei, M. K., Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Edmond, M. B. (2014). Gender equality and violent behavior: How neighborhood gender equality influences the gender gap in violence. Violence and victims, 29(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00102
  34. Lindsey, L. L. (2015). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.
  35. Linton, C., & Lorde, T. (2011). The influence of gender and gender role attitudes on domestic violence culpability assignment in Barbados.
  36. McClintock, C., & Lebovic, J. H. (2006). Correlates of levels of democracy in Latin America during the 1990s. Latin American Politics and Society, 48, 29-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2006.tb00346.x
  37. Park. J. S. (2013). Gauging gender equality in terms of household labor division and gender-role perception. Health and Walfare Policy Forum. 199. 28-38.
  38. Pizzey, E. (1977). Scream quietly or the neighbors will hear. Short Hills.
  39. Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross‐national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41(3), 611-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00999.x
  40. Sahin, N. H., Timur, S., Ergin, A. B., Taspinar, A., Balkaya, N. A., & Cubukcu, S. (2010). Childhood trauma, type of marriage and self-esteem as correlates of domestic violence in married women in Turkey. Journal of family violence, 25(7), 661-668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9325-5
  41. Salcioglu, E., Urhan, S., Pirinccioglu, T., & Aydin, S. (2017). Anticipatory fear and helplessness predict PTSD and depression in domestic violence survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000200
  42. Schalkwyk, J. (2000). Culture, gender equality and development cooperation. Canadian International Development Agency(CIDA), Quebec.
  43. Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men, and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure (No. 127). Greenwood Pub Group.
  44. Showalter, K. (2016). Women's employment and domestic violence: a review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.017
  45. Siegel, J. A., & Williams, L. M. (2003). Risk factors for sexual victimization of women results from a prospective study. Violence Against Women, 9(8), 902-930 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801203255130
  46. Straus, M. M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (Eds.). (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Transaction Publishers.
  47. Warren, J., & Lanning, W. (1992). Sex role beliefs, control, and social isolation of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978720
  48. Yoo, Jeong Ah & Huang, Chien-Chung. (2012). The effects of domestic violence on children's behavior problems: Assessing the moderating roles of poverty and marital status. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2464-2473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.09.014