The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ceramic molar crown reproducibility by digital workflow manufacturing: An in vitro study

  • Jeong, II-Do (Institute for Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Jinyoung (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Myeong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2016.10.13
  • Accepted : 2017.03.21
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This in vitro study aimed to analyze and compare the reproducibility of zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns manufactured by digital workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A typodont model with a prepped upper first molar was set in a phantom head, and a digital impression was obtained with a video intraoral scanner (CEREC Omnicam; Sirona GmbH), from which a single crown was designed and manufactured with CAD/CAM into a zirconia crown and lithium disilicate crown (n=12). Reproducibility of each crown was quantitatively retrieved by superimposing the digitized data of the crown in 3D inspection software, and differences were graphically mapped in color. Areas with large differences were analyzed with digital microscopy. Mean quadratic deviations (RMS) quantitatively obtained from each ceramic group were statistically analyzed with Student's t-test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The RMS value of lithium disilicate crown was $29.2\;(4.1){\mu}m$ and $17.6\;(5.5){\mu}m$ on the outer and inner surfaces, respectively, whereas these values were $18.6\;(2.0){\mu}m$ and $20.6\;(5.1){\mu}m$ for the zirconia crown. Reproducibility of zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns had a statistically significant difference only on the outer surface (P<.001). The outer surface of lithium disilicate crown showed over-contouring on the buccal surface and under-contouring on the inner occlusal surface. The outer surface of zirconia crown showed both over- and under-contouring on the buccal surface, and the inner surface showed under-contouring in the marginal areas. CONCLUSION. Restoration manufacturing by digital workflow will enhance the reproducibility of zirconia single crowns more than that of lithium disilicate single crowns.

Keywords

References

  1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  2. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-4, 426-8, 430-1.
  3. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:557-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015
  4. Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014;42:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016
  5. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent Mater 2013;29:851-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.018
  6. Stookey SD. Catalyzed crystallization of glass in theory and practice. Ind Eng Chem 1959;51:805-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50595a022
  7. McMillan PW, Phillips SV, Partridge G. The structure and properties of a lithium zinc silicate glass-ceramic. J Mater Sci 1966;1:269-79.
  8. Freiman SW, Hench LL. Effect of Crystallization on the Mechanical Properties of Li2O-SiO2 Glass-Ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1972;55:86-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11216.x
  9. Anusavice KJ, Zhang NZ, Moorhead JE. Influence of colorants on crystallization and mechanical properties of lithiabased glass-ceramics. Dent Mater 1994;10:141-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90055-8
  10. Lupu M, Giordano RA. Flexural strength of CAD/CAM ceramic framework materials. J Dent Res 2007;88:224.
  11. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonca G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:770-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002
  12. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Hertzian contact response and damage tolerance of dental ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;34:124-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.002
  13. Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for dental applications: a review. Materials 2010;3:351-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3010351
  14. Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Net-shaping of ceramic components by direct ceramic machining. Assembly Autom 2003;23:382-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310501217
  15. Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MM, Katamish HA, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:83-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60020-7
  16. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
  17. International Organization for Standardization. ISO-5725-1. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results ? Part 1: General Principles and Definitions. Geneva: ISO; 1994. Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso/store.html
  18. International Organization for Standardization. ISO-12836. Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - Test methods for assessing accuracy. Geneva: ISO; 2012. Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso/store.html
  19. Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.012
  20. Wiedhahn K, Schenk O, Fritzsche G. Cerec Omnicam - Intraoralscan 2.0. Int J Comput Dent 2012;15:199-205.
  21. Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5S-9S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0356
  22. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
  23. Addison O, Cao X, Sunnar P, Fleming GJ. Machining variability impacts on the strength of a 'chair-side' CAD-CAM ceramic. Dent Mater 2012;28:880-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.017

Cited by

  1. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.335
  2. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354
  3. A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows vol.9, pp.14, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142778
  4. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Adjustment in the Oral Cavity for Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated Using Different Scanners vol.30, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13259
  5. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies vol.9, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080983