The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics

  • Received : 2016.11.09
  • Accepted : 2017.01.10
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To evaluate the adhesion to CAD/CAM feldspathic blocks by failure analysis and shear bond strength test (SBSt) of different restorative systems and different surface treatments, for purpose of moderate chipping repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr) containing bi-functional phosphate monomers and a conventional flowable resin composite (Premise Flow, Kerr) applied with and without adhesive system (Optibond Solo Plus, Kerr) were combined with three different surface treatments (Hydrofluoric Acid Etching, Sandblasting, combination of both) for repairing feldspathic ceramics. Two commercial systems for ceramic repairing were tested as controls (Porcelain Repair Kit, Ultradent, and CoJet System, 3M). SBSt was performed and failure mode was evaluated using a digital microscope. A One-Way ANOVA (Tukey test for post hoc) was applied to the SBSt data and the Fisher's Exact Test was applied to the failure analysis data. RESULTS. The use of resin systems containing bi-functional phosphate monomers combined with hydrofluoric acid etching of the ceramic surface gave the highest values in terms of bond strength and of more favorable failure modalities. CONCLUSION. The simplified repairing method based on self-adhering flowable resin combined with the use of hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength values and a favorable failure mode. Repairing of ceramic chipping with a self-adhering flowable resin associated with hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength with a less time consuming and technique-sensitive procedure compared to standard procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011;56:84-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01299.x
  2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8
  3. Tan K, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Chan ES. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:654-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x
  4. Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of allceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:86-96.
  5. Anusavice KJ. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater 2012;28:102-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.012
  6. Hickel R, Brushaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations-criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 2013;29:28-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006
  7. Vita Zahnfabrik. Vitablocs working instructions 1769E;05/2012.
  8. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493-502.
  9. Burke FJ, Grey NJ. Repair of fractured porcelain units: alternative approaches. Br Dent J 1994;176:251-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808428
  10. Kimmich M, Stappert CF. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: a review and clinical application. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:31-44. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0011
  11. Reston EG, Filho SC, Arossi G, Cogo RB, Rocha Cdos S, Closs LQ. Repairing ceramic restorations: final solution or alternative procedure? Oper Dent 2008;33:461-6. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-151
  12. Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson NH. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: All-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems. Dent Update 2011;38:150-2, 154-6, 158. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2011.38.3.150
  13. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1497-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6
  14. Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:609-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0729-x
  15. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:299-309.
  16. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  17. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I-microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:367-73.
  18. Sadek FT, Cury AH, Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Cardoso PE. The influence of the cutting speed on bond strength and integrity of microtensile specimens. Dent Mater 2005;21:1144-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.020
  19. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimens' structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. Dent Mater 2004;20:643-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.009
  20. Tylka DF, Stewart GP. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain-composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:121-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90067-1
  21. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401
  22. Ferrari M, Goracci C, Sadek F, Eduardo P, Cardoso C. Microtensile bond strength tests: scanning electron microscopy evaluation of sample integrity before testing. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:385-91. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21317.x
  23. Knight JS, Holmes JR, Bradford H, Lawson C. Shear bond strengths of composite bonded to porcelain using porcelain repair systems. Am J Dent 2003;16:252-4.
  24. van der Vyver PJ, de Wet FA, Botha SJ. Shear bond strength of five porcelain repair systems on cerec porcelain. SADJ 2005;60:196-8, 200.
  25. Yoo JY, Yoon HI, Park JM, Park EJ. Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:343-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.343
  26. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Sancakli E, Eren MM, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yildiz E. Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:434-43. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.434
  27. Tarib NA, Anuar N, Ahmad M. Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:339-344. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.339
  28. Goia TS, Leite FP, Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:400-2.
  29. Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior L Jr, Ozcan M, Bottino MA. Influence of acid-etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012;60:e79-85.
  30. Newburg R, Pameijer CH. Composite resins bonded to porcelain with silane solution. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:288-91. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0071
  31. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  32. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1477-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.020
  33. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: a comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:268-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310005556
  34. Kussano CM, Bonfante G, Batista JG, Pinto JH. Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment. Braz Dent J 2003;14:132-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402003000200011
  35. Vertise Flow Technical Bulletin, Kerr Corporation Lit. No. 34929B. Available from https://embed.widencdn.net/download/kavokerr/4knq7qig7c/vertiseflow_techbulletin_34929b.pdf?u=18sth1.
  36. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. Adhesive luting of allceramic restorations-the impact of cementation variables and short-term water storage on the strength of a feldspathic dental ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:285-93.
  37. Timokhin AR, Komarova LA. Chemical reaction of ammonium bifluoride with quartz glass. Glass Ceram 1985;42:267-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697937
  38. Yen TW, Blackman RB, Baez RJ. Effect of acid etching on the flexural strength of a feldspathic porcelain and a castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:224-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90056-T

Cited by

  1. Potential contribution of selected metallic restorative dentistry materials to X-ray fluorescence vol.54, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2019023
  2. Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems vol.12, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.131
  3. Intraoral repair of a chipped porcelain‐zirconia restoration vol.32, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12592
  4. Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments vol.12, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.273
  5. Repair bond strength of dental computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufactured ceramics after different surface treatments vol.32, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12635