한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제50권8호
  • /
  • Pages.579-586
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기능성 스크린이 부착된 집수관의 취수량 및 수질 분석

Analysis of water withdrawal and quality of intake pipe with functional screen

  • 투고 : 2017.05.22
  • 심사 : 2017.06.30
  • 발행 : 2017.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기능성 스크린이 부착된 집수관의 정량적인 취수량을 분석하고, 여과 재료를 통한 부유물질 및 탁도의 개선효과를 알아보기 위해 네 단계의 연구방법을 제시하였다. 첫 번째 단계에서는 소규모의 실험장치를 구성하여 실증 플랜트 여과 재료의 구성 방법을 결정하였고, 두 번째 단계에서는 견본 장치를 구성하여 기능성 스크린이 장착된 집수관을 통해 유량 값을 측정하였다. 세 번째 단계에서는 각각의 여과 재료에 대해서 탁도의 상태를 달리하여 유량을 측정하고, MODFLOW를 이용하여 투수계수를 추정하였다. 마지막으로 견본 장치를 MODFLOW로 수치모델을 구성하여 세 번째 단계에서 추정된 투수계수를 각각 적용하고 취수량을 분석하였다. 0 NTU일 때 추정된 투수계수 적용 결과 실제 관측 유량에 비해 모델링 결과는 39.96% 높게 나타났다. 이에 비해 100~120 NTU일 때 추정된 투수계수 적용 결과 유량의 차이는 9.41% 높게 나타났다.

In order to analyze the quantitative water withdrawal amount of intake pipe with functional screen and to evaluate the improvement effect of the suspended solid and turbidity through the filter media, four-step research methods were suggested. In the first step, laboratory scale experiments were constructed to determine the constitution method of the sample device filter media. In the second step, sample device was constructed and the flow rate was observed through intake pipe with functional screen. In the third step, flow rate was observed at different turbidity conditions for each filter material, and the hydraulic conductivity was estimated using MODFLOW. Finally, numerical model was constructed with the MODFLOW for the sample device and the estimated hydraulic conductivities were applied to the third step and the amount of water withdrawal was analyzed. As a result of applying hydraulic conductivity at 0 NTU, 39.96% more withdrawal was calculated than the observed flow rate. On the other hand, when hydraulic conductivity was applied at 100~120 NTU, the difference in flow rates was 9.41%.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baumgarten, B., Jahrig, J., Reemtsma, T., and Jekel, M. (2011). "Long term laboratory column experiments to simulate bank filtration: factors controlling removal of sulfamethoxazole." Journal of Water Research, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.034
  2. Eckert, P., and Irmscher, R. (2006). "Over 130 years of experience with riverbank filtration in Dusseldorf, Germany." Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 283-291. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.0012
  3. Grischek, T., Schoenheinz, D., Worch, E., and Hiscock, K. M. (2002). "Bank filtration in Europe - an overview of aquifer conditions and hydraulic controls, In: Management of Aquifer Recharge for Sustainability." Dillon, P.(ed.) Swets Zeitlinger, Balkema, Lisse, pp. 485-488.
  4. Harbaugh, A. W., and McDonald, M. G. (1996). User's documentation for MODFLOW-96. An update to the U.S. geological survey modular fivite-difference ground-water flow model. Open File Report 96-485, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  5. Henzler, A. F., Greskowiak, J., and Massmann, G. (2014). "Modeling the fate of organic micropollutants durign river bank filtration (Berlin, Germany)." Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol. 156, pp. 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.10.005
  6. Im, H. C., and Choi, H. C. (2011). "Estimation of pumping rate through modeling in open-sut riverbed filtration application area." Proceeding of Korean Society on Water Environment & Korean Society of Water & Wastewater, Il-San, Korea, pp. 419-420 (in Korean).
  7. Kadlec, R. H. (1997). "An autobiotic wetland phosphorus model." Ecological Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. 145-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00257-7
  8. Schafer, D. C. (2004). "Hydraulic analysis and modeling of riverbank filtration for Louisville water company" International Workshop on Riverbank/bed Filtration, organized by KIST (Green Korea 21), COEX.
  9. Schubert, J. (2002). "Hydraulic aspects of riverbank filtration-field studies." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 266, pp. 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00159-2
  10. Sung, C. D., Ahn, K. H., Lee, Y. H., Kong, I. C., and Kim, S. H. (2003). "A study on the water quality improvement through river bed filtration - model development and parameter determination." Journal of Korea Social Environment Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 486-494
  11. Ulrich, C., Hubbard, S. S., Florsheim, J., Rosenberry, D., Borglin, S., Trotta, M., and Seymour, D. (2015). "Riverbed clogging associated with a California riverbank filtration system: an assessment of mechnisms and monitoring approaches." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 529, pp. 1740-1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.012
  12. Yang, J. S., Kim, I. H., and Jeong, J. H. (2016). "A study on the application of modified hydraulic conductivity to consider turbid water for open-cut riverbed infiltration process: numerical modeling approach" Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 741-748 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.9.741