Journal of Korea Port Economic Association (한국항만경제학회지)

The Korea Port Economic Association (한국항만경제학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Competitiveness of Terminals in Busan and Shanghai Ports using TOPSIS

TOPSIS를 이용한 부산항과 상해항의 터미널 경쟁력에 관한 연구

  • 김아롬 (한국해양대학교 해운경영학부) ;
  • 김광희 (동명대학교 해운경영학과)
  • Received : 2017.03.21
  • Accepted : 2017.06.27
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to (1) investigate the main factors for the evaluation of port competitiveness through a literature review; (2) compare each terminal's competitiveness in Busan and Shanghai ports using TOPSIS methodology; (3) determine how to improve Busan port competitiveness. TOPSIS analysis of throughput shows that the terminals in Shanghai (SMCT, SGICT) are competitive. Shanghai is ranked first in both the port physical analysis (SMCT) and the financial one (SSICT). Total competitiveness analysis shows that Shanghai terminals (SSICT, SMCT, and SGICT) are more competitive than the ones in the Busan port. In this analysis, the SSICT ranks the top terminal in port physical and financial categories, while the SMCT ranks the first terminal in terms of throughput. The results of this study provide important policy implications for the Busan port, whose international status as a transshipment port and international logistics hub has lowered, and whose recent growth is slower than that of the competing international ports.

본 연구의 목적은 먼저 문헌조사를 통해 항만의 경쟁력에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대해 분석하고, 둘째, 부산항과 상하이항의 터미널별 경쟁력을 TOPSIS 이론을 바탕으로 분석하여 비교한다. 마지막으로 분석결과를 바탕으로 부산항의 항만경쟁력 제고 방안을 마련한다. 분석결과, 물동량 요인의 경쟁력은 상하이항의 SMCT, SGICT가 부산항의 터미널에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 항만시설 요인과 재무적 요인은 각각 상하이항의 SMCT와 SSICT가 가장 경쟁력이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 종합적인 경쟁력은 상하이항(SSICT, SMCT 및 SGICT) 이 부산항 컨테이너 터미널에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 특히 SSICT는 종합적인 경쟁력이 가장 높은 터미널로 이 연구에서 분석되었고, 항만시설 요인과 재무적 요인에서 각각 가장 높은 경쟁력을 보였다. 상하이항의 SMCT는 물동량 요인에서 가장 경쟁력이 있는 터미널로 분석되었다. 이러한 연구의 결과는 환적항 및 국제물류 거점항으로서 국제적인 지위도 낮아지고, 경쟁 국제항만에 비하여 최근의 성장세도 주춤한 상황에 놓여있는 부산항의 정책에 주요 시사점을 준다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김기윤.김도형(2012), 항만물류종합정보시스템의 재난복구 우선순위결정 : 퍼지 TOPSIS 접근방법, 한국IT서비스학회지, 제11권 제3호, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2012.11.3.001
  2. 김민경.강경식(2016), TOPSIS방법을 이용한 교육서비스품질 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구, 대한안전경영과학회지, 제18권 제4호, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.12812/KSMS.2016.18.4.195
  3. 김시현(2015), 국제항만 운영에서 지속가능한 항만경쟁력 확보방안, 한국항만경제학회지, 제 31권 제3호, 61-74.
  4. 모수원.정홍영.이광배(2015), 시장비교우위지수를 이용한 부산항의 수출경쟁력 분석, 한국항만경제학회지, 제31권 제3호, 123-133.
  5. 박길영.하명신(2015), 부산항 신항 북컨테이너 배후단지의 경쟁력 제고, 한국항만경제학회지, 제 31권 제3호, 75-91.
  6. 박호(2012), Shannon's Entropy와 DEA를 결합한 효율성 분석, 생산성논집, 제26권 제4호, 193-214.
  7. 송계의(2014), 글로벌 항만컨테이너터미널 경쟁력 제고 방안, 한국항만경제학회지, 제30권 제1호, 1-21.
  8. 이은경.김동진.문대섭(2013), Entropy-TOPSIS기법을 적용한 한-유럽 간 국제 운송경로의 경쟁력 분석연구, 생산성논집, 제27권 제4호, 123-149.
  9. 이충배.권아림(2014), 변이할당기법과 DEA를 활용한 동북아시아 항만간 경쟁력 비교 분석, 한국항만경제학회지, 제30권 제4호, 219-254.
  10. 이충배.만준빈.김정환(2012), 중국 해운산업의 국제경쟁력 비교연구, 한국항만경제학회지, 제 28권 제1호, 289-312.
  11. 정봉현(2014), 광양항의 경쟁력 평가요인과 강화전략, 한국항만경제학회지, 제30권 제1호, 119-142.
  12. 하봉찬.문상영(2015), TOPSIS를 활용한 아시아 주요 공항의 효율성 평가 : 수입, 성장, 수익 측면에서의 비교연구, 해운물류연구, 제31권 제2호, 391-405.
  13. Brooks, M. R.(1984), An Alternative Theoretical Approach to the Evaluation of Liner Shipping (part 1. Situational Factors), Maritime Policy and Management, 11(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838400000032
  14. Brooks, M. R.(1985), An Alternative Theoretical Approach to the Evaluation of Liner Shipping (part 2. Choice/Criteria), Maritime Policy and Management, 12(4), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838500000050
  15. Chang, Y. et al.(2008), Port Selection Factors by Shipping Lines: Different Perspectives between Trunk Liners and Feeder Service Providers, Marine Policy, 32, 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.01.003
  16. Chiu, R. H.(1996), Logistics Performance of Liner Shipping in Taiwan, PhD Dissertation, Department of Maritime Studies and International Transport, University of Wales College of Cardiff, UK.
  17. Chou, C.(2007), A Fuzzy MCDM Method for Solving Marine Transshipment Container Port Selection Problems', Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186(1), 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.125
  18. Kim A. R.(2016), A Study on Competitiveness Analysis of Ports in Korea and China by Entropy Weight TOPSIS, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(4), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.12.001
  19. Kim, A. and Lu, J.(2015), A Study on the Effects of Network Centrality and Efficiency on the Throughput of Korean and Chinese Container Ports, ICTE 2015, 760-769.
  20. Lirn, T. et al.(2004), An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6, 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093
  21. Malchow, M. B. and Kanafani, A.(2001), A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection, Maritime Policy and Management, 28(3), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830110060840
  22. Ng, K. Y.(2006), Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transshipment Market: an Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(3), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100158
  23. Rios, L. and Macada, A.(2006), Analyzing the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals of Mercosur using DEA, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8, 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100168
  24. Saeed N.(2009), An Analysis of Carriers' Selection Criteria When Choosing Container Terminals in Pakistan, Maritime Economic and Logistics, 11(3), 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2009.8
  25. Sayareh J. and Alizmini H. R.(2014), A Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Selecting Container Seaport in the Persian Gulf, Asian Journal of Shipping & Logistics, 2014, 30(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2014.04.004
  26. Song, D. W. and Yeo, K. T.(2004), A Completive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096
  27. Tang, L. C. et al.(2011), Understanding Port Choice Behavior - A Network Perspective, Netw Spat Econ, 11(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-008-9081-8
  28. Tiwari, P. et al.(2003), Shippers' Containerized Cargo Transportation Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis, Journal of Transportation Economics and Statistics, 6(1), 71-87.
  29. Tongzon J.(2001), Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports using Data Envelopment Analysis, Transportation Research A, 35, 82-99.
  30. Tongzon, J.(2009), Port Choice and Freight Forwarders, Transportation Research Part E, 45, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004
  31. Tongzon, J. and Sawant, L.(2007), Port Choice in a Competitive Environment: from the Shipping Lines' Perspective, Applied Economics, 39(4), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500438871
  32. Veldman, S. et al.(2011), Determinants of Container Port Choice in Spain, Maritime Policy & Management, 38(5), 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.597450
  33. Wang, T. and Cullinane, K.(2006), The Efficiency of European Container Terminals and Implications for Supply Chain Management, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8, 82-99. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100151
  34. Wu, Y. and Cui, P.(2013), A Container Port Choice Model for Pearl River Delta Region in South China, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96(11), 1839-1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.209
  35. Yang J. et al. (2015), Port Choice Strategies for Container Carriers in China: A case study of the Bohai Bay Rim Port Cluster, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(2), 1-24.
  36. Yeo, G. T. et al.(2008), Evaluating the Competitiveness of Container Ports in Korea and China, Transportation Research Part A, 42, 910-921.