DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Generation Scheduling with Large-Scale Wind Farms using Grey Wolf Optimization

  • Saravanan, R. (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University) ;
  • Subramanian, S. (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University) ;
  • Dharmalingam, V. (Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Pandian Saraswathi Yadav Engineering College) ;
  • Ganesan, S. (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University)
  • Received : 2016.07.27
  • Accepted : 2017.03.20
  • Published : 2017.07.01

Abstract

Integration of wind generators with the conventional power plants will raise operational challenges to the electric power utilities due to the uncertainty of wind availability. Thus, the Generation Scheduling (GS) among the online generating units has become crucial. This process can be formulated mathematically as an optimization problem. The GS problem of wind integrated power system is inherently complex because the formulation involves non-linear operational characteristics of generating units, system and operational constraints. As the robust tool is viable to address the chosen problem, the modern bio-inspired algorithm namely, Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) algorithm is chosen as the main optimization tool. The intended algorithm is implemented on the standard test systems and the attained numerical results are compared with the earlier reports. The comparison clearly indicates the intended tool is robust and a promising alternative for solving GS problems.

Keywords

References

  1. A. J. Wood and B. F. Wollenberg, Power System Generation, Operation and Control, New York: John Wiley, 1996.
  2. Z. Ouyang and S.M. Shahidehpour, "An intelligent dynamic programming for unit commitment application," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1203-1209, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.119267
  3. Hiroshi Sasaki, Masahiro Watanabe and Junji Kubokawa, "A solution method of unit commitment by artificial neural tabu -search-based hybrid -optimization technique," IET Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 563-574, Aug. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:20045190
  4. U.D. Annakkage, T. Numnonda and P.C. Pahalawaththa, "Unit commitment by parallel simulated annealing," Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., Gen. Transm. Dist., vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 595-600, Aug. 2002.
  5. G. K. Purushothama and L. Jenkins, "Simulated annealing with local search - a hybrid algorithm for unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 273-278, Feb. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807069
  6. D. N. Simopoulos, S. D. Kavatza and C. D. Vournas, "Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 68-76, Jan. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2005.860922
  7. T. W. Lau, C. Y. Chung and K. P. Wong, "Quantum inspired evolutionary algorithm approach for unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1503-1512, Aug. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021220
  8. S. Patra, S. K. Goswami and B. Goswami, "Differential evolution algorithm for solving unit commitment with ramp constraints," Elect. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 771-787, June 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325000801911377
  9. D. Dilip and D. Sapatarshi, "A binary-real-coded differential evolution for unit commitment problem," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 42, pp. 517-524, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.04.048
  10. K. Y. Huang, H. T. Yang and C. L. Yang, "A new thermal unit commitment approach using constraint logic programming," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, Aug. 2002.
  11. S. A. Kazarlis, A. G. Bakirtzis and V. Petridid, "A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 83-92, Aug 2002.
  12. D. C. Walters and G. B. Sheble, "Genetic algorithm solution of economic dispatch with valve point loadings," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1325-1331, Aug. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.260861
  13. S. Virmani. E.C. Adrian, K. Imhof and S.Mukherjee, "Implementation of a Lagrangian relaxation based unit commitment problem," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 34-34, Sep. 2007.
  14. C. P. Cheng, C. W. Liu and C. C. Liu, "Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 707-714, Aug. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.867163
  15. T. Logenthiran, Wai Lok Woo and Van Tung Phan, "Lagrangian relaxation hybrid with evolutionary algorithm with short term scheduling," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 64, pp. 356-364, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.044
  16. A.I Cohen and M.Yoshimura, "A branch - and bound algorithm for unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 444, 1983.
  17. H. Mori and O. Matsuzaki, "Application of priority - list-embedded tabu search to unit commitment in power systems," Inst. Elect. Eng. Japan, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 535-541, Dec. 2008.
  18. K.A. Juste, H. Kiat, E. Tanaka and J. Hasegawa, "Unit commitment by a tabu search based hybrid opti-misation technique," IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 563-574, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:20045190
  19. R. Karki, "Renewable energy credit driven wind power growth for system reliability," Elect. Power Syst. Res., vol. 77, pp. 797-803, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2006.07.004
  20. J. Hetzer and D.C. Yu, "An economic dispatch model incorporating wind power," IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 23, pp. 603-611, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2007.914171
  21. C L. Chen, "Optimal wind-thermal generating unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 273-280, Mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2007.914188
  22. H. Siahkali and M. Vakilian, "Electricity generation scheduling with large-scale wind farms using particle swarm optimization," Elect Power Syst. Res., vol. 79, pp. 826-836, Dec 2008.
  23. Y. W. Jeong, J. B. Park and S. H. Jang, "A new quantum inspired binary PSO application to unit commitment problems for power systems," IEEE Trans Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 3, pp.1486-1495, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2042472
  24. Xiang Yu and Xueqing Zhang, "Unit commitment using Lagrangian relaxation and particle swarm optimization," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 61, pp. 510-522, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.03.061
  25. Anup Shukla and S. N. Singh, "Advanced three stage pseudo-inspired weight improved crazy particle swarm optimization for unit commitment," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 96, pp. 23-36, Feb. 2016.
  26. G. Marian Marcoveccio, Q. Augusto Novals and E. Ignacio Grossmann, "Deterministic optimization of the thermal unit commitment problem: a branch and cut search," Comp. Chem. Eng., vol. 67, pp. 53-68, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.03.009
  27. S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, "Grey wolf optimizer," Adv. in Eng. Software, vol. 69, pp. 46-61, Mar. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
  28. Dewan Fayzur Rahman, Ana Viana and Joao Pedro Pedroso, "Metaheuristic search based methods for unit commitment," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 59, pp. 14-22, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.01.038
  29. Raca Todasijevic, Marko Mladenovic, Said Hanafi and Igor Crevits, "Adaptive general variable neighborhood search heuristics for solving the unit commitment problem," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 78, pp. 873-883, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.031
  30. Vikram Kumar Kamboj, S.K. Bath and J.S. Dhillon, "Implementation of hybrid harmony search/random search algorithm for single area unit commitment problem," Elect. Power and Energy Syst., vol. 77, pp. 228-249, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.045
  31. Sudhir Sharma, Shivani Mehta and Nitish Chopra, "Economic load dispatch using grey wolf optimization," Int. J. Eng. Res. and Appl., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 128-132, Apr. 2015.