한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국제학술대회 논문의 인용 지수와 저자의 특성에 관한 연구 - 정보과학 분야를 중심으로 -

The Impacts of Authorship on the Future Citations of Conference Articles in 'Information Science' Field

  • 투고 : 2017.04.17
  • 심사 : 2017.05.12
  • 발행 : 2017.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 다양한 저자특성이 '정보과학' 분야 국제 학술대회 논문의 인용 수에 끼치는 영향을 연구하였다. 논문 인용수의 변화와 관련이 깊은 요소들을 조사, 분석하는 계량서지학 연구는 학술지 논문에 편향되어 있으며 국제 학술대회 논문을 표본으로 삼는 연구는 아직 초기 단계이다. 더욱이 저자특성과 학술대회 논문의 인용 수를 연관하여 조사한 연구는 극히 드물다. 기존 연구에 따르면 저자 특성이 인용지수에 끼치는 영향력은 학문 분야에 따라 상당한 차이가 있다. 따라서 저자의 다양한 특성이 '정보과학' 분야 학회 논문에 얼마나 영향을 끼치는지 별도로 조사할 필요도 있다. 본 연구는 1,957편의 '정보과학' 관련 학술대회 논문과 여덟 가지의 저자특성을 조사하였다. 특히 논문 출간 당시의 여러 저자 특성이 앞으로 해당 학회 논문이 얻게 될 인용 수를 얼마나 예측할 수 있는지를 중점적으로 조사, 분석하였다. 그 결과로, 저자의 논문출간 경험치를 나타내는 특성이 유의미한 영향력이 있었고 그 중에서도 주저자의 논문 출간 연력과 직책, 공저자의 논문 수에 따라 인용수가 변화하였다. 하지만 저자 간의 협력 정도를 나타내는 특성은 영향력이 없었다.

This paper aims to explore the impacts of various authorship-related factors on future citations of conference articles in 'Information Science' discipline. A large body of bibliometric studies has suggested that the impacts of various authorship-related factors on the future citations vary by the discipline and there is no well-grounded factor that is unanimously significant across all academic fields. That is, it is necessary to separately assess the impact of authorship-related factors on 'Information Science' articles. Moreover, while a number of bibliometric studies have focused on journal articles, the exploration of conference articles has been significantly fewer. Therefore, this study, which is based on 1,957 conference articles in 'Information Science' field, examined several factors about authors and the contributions of the factors to the future citation. The sources of citation rates of conference articles were Google Scholar and Scopus. As the results, among eight factors considered in this paper, the first authors' publishing tenure and job title and the average number of publications of other authors significantly contributed to the changes of citations. However, the number of authors, the number of affiliated institues, the number of the first authors' publications and the average publishing tenure of the other authors made little contributions on citations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김완종. 2012. "한국 과학기술 논문의 인용속도 및 인용빈도에 영향을 미치는 서지 요인에 관한 연구." 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(4): 285-309.(Kim, Wan-Jong. 2012. "A Study on the Factors Influencing Citation Speed and Citation Frequency of Scientific Articles Using Bibliometric Analysis in South Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4): 285-309.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.285
  2. Abbasi, A. 2016. "A Longitudinal Analysis of Link Formation on Collaboration Networks." Journal of Informetrics, 10(3): 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.05.001
  3. Biscaro, C. and Giupponi, C. 2014. "Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations." PLOS ONE, 9(6): 1-12.
  4. Bordons, M., Aparicio, J. and Costas, R. 2013. "Heterogeneity of Collaboration and Its Relationship with Research Impact in a Biomedical Field." Scientometrics, 96(2): 443-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0890-7
  5. Bornmann, L. et al. 2012. "Diversity, Value and Limitations of the Journal Impact Factor and Alternative Metrics." Rheumatology International, 32(7): 1861-1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2276-1
  6. Cohen, J. et al. 2013. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
  7. Didegah, F. and Thelwall, M. 2013. "Determinants of Research Citation Impact in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5): 1055-1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22806
  8. Eckmann, M., Rocha, A. and Wainer, J. 2012. "Relationship between High-Quality Journals and Conferences in Computer Vision." Scientometrics, 90(2): 617-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0527-2
  9. Franceschet, M. 2010. "A Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators for Computer Science Scholars and Journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar." Scientometrics, 83(1): 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0021-2
  10. Freyne, J. et al. 2010. "Relative Status of Journal and Conference Publications in Computer Science." Communications of the ACM, 53(11): 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1145/1839676.1839701
  11. Hakanson, M. 2005. "The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College and Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Library Quarterly." College & Research Libraries, 66(4): 312-323. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.66.4.312
  12. Harzing, A. W. and Alakangas, S. 2016. "Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison." Scientometrics, 106(2): 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
  13. Haslam, N. et al. 2008. "What Makes an Article Influential? Predicting Impact in Social and Personality Psychology." Scientometrics, 76(1): 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8
  14. He, Z. L. 2009. "International Collaboration Does Not Have Greater Epistemic Authority." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10): 2151-2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21150
  15. Hjorland, B. 2013. "Citation Analysis: A Social and Dynamic Approach to Knowledge Organization." Information Processing & Management, 49(6): 1313-1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001
  16. Ibanez, A., Bielza, C. and Larranaga, P. 2013. "Relationship among Research Collaboration, Number of Documents and Number of Citations: A Case Study in Spanish Computer Science Production in 2000-2009." Scientometrics, 95(2): 689-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0883-6
  17. Keith, T. Z. 2014. Multiple Regression and Beyond: An Introduction to Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Routledge.
  18. Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C. R. and Cronin, B. 2012. "A Bibliometric Chronicling of Library and Information Science's First Hundred Years." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5): 997-1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22645
  19. Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H. and Yen, H. R. 2013. "Co-authorship Networks and Research Impact: A Social Capital Perspective." Research Policy, 42(9): 1515-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
  20. Lisee, C., Lariviere, V. and Archambault, E. 2008. "Conference Proceedings as a Source of Scientific Information: A Bibliometric Analysis." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11): 1776-1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20888
  21. Lu, K. and Wolfram, D. 2012. "Measuring Author Research Relatedness: A Comparison of Word-based, Topic-based, and Author Cocitation Approaches." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10): 1973-1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22628
  22. Meho, L. I. and Yang, K. 2007. "Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2105-2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677
  23. Montesi, M. and Owen, J. M. 2008. "From Conference to Journal Publication: How Conference Papers in Software Engineering are Extended for Publication in Journals." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5): 816-829. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20805
  24. Onodera, N. and Yoshikane, F. 2015. "Factors Affecting Citation Rates of Research Articles." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4): 739-764. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23209
  25. Peng, T. Q. and Zhu, J. JH. 2012. "Where You Publish Matters Most: A Multilevel Analysis of Factors Affecting Citations of Internet Studies." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9): 1789-1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22649
  26. Sin, S. C. J. 2011. "International Coauthorship and Citation Impact: A Bibliometric Study of Six LIS Journals, 1980-2008." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9): 1770-1783. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21572
  27. Steyvers, M. et al. 2004. "Probabilistic Author-topic Models for Information Discovery." In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 22-25, 2004, Seattle: 306-315.
  28. Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., and Ahamdzadeh, K. 2016. "Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature." Scientometrics, 107(3): 1195-1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
  29. Tang, J., Jin, R. and Zhang, J. 2008. "A Topic Modeling Approach and Its Integration into the Random Walk Framework for Academic Search." In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Wokshops, December 15-19, 2008, Pisa: 1055-1060.
  30. Van Dalen, H. P. and Henkens, K. N. 2005. "Signals in Science - On the Importance of Signaling in Gaining Attention in Science." Scientometrics, 64(2): 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0248-5
  31. Vardi, M. Y. 2010. "Revisiting the Publication Culture in Computing Research." Communications of the ACM, 53(3): 5-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1666420.1666421
  32. Vrettas, G. and Sanderson, M. 2015. "Conferences versus Journals in Computer Science." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12): 2674-2684. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23349
  33. Wainer, J., De Oliveira, H. P. and Anido, R. 2011. "Patterns of Bibliographic References in the ACM Published Papers." Information Processing & Management, 47(1): 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.07.002
  34. Wainer, J. and Valle, E. 2013. "What Happens to Computer Science Research after It is Published? Tracking CS Research Lines." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6): 1104-1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22818
  35. Wallace, M. L., Lariviere, V. and Gingras, Y. 2012. "A Small World of Citations? The Influence of Collaboration Networks on Citation Practices." PLOS ONE, 7(3): 1-10.
  36. Walters, G. D. 2006. "Predicting Subsequent Citations to Articles Published in Twelve Crime-psychology Journals: Author Impact versus Journal Impact." Scientometrics, 69(3): 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0166-1
  37. Waltman, L. 2016. "A Review of the Literature on Citation Impact Indicators." Journal of Informetrics, 10(2): 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
  38. Wersig, G. 1993. "Information Science: The Study of Postmodern Knowledge Usage." Information Processing & Management, 29(2): 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90006-Y
  39. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R. and Wouters, P. 2014. "How Well Developed are Altmetrics? A Cross-disciplinary Analysis of the Presence of Alternative Metrics' in Scientific Publications." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1491-1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0
  40. Zhang, Y. and Jia, X. 2013. "Republication of Conference Papers in Journals?" Learned Publishing, 26(3): 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1087/20130307
  41. Zhao, D. and Strotmann, A. 2014. "The Knowledge Base and Research Front of Information Science 2006-2010: An Author Cocitation and Bibliographic Coupling Analysis." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5): 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23027