Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Design Guidelines for Inclusive Parks as an Inclusive Environment for the Disabled and the Non-Disabled

장애·비장애인 통합 환경으로서의 통합공원 조성을 위한 관련 가이드라인 분석

  • Nam, Hyeon-Gyeong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Ah-Yeon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, The University of Seoul)
  • 남현경 (서울시립대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 김아연 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2016.05.02
  • Accepted : 2017.04.03
  • Published : 2017.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the 1960s, as de-institutionalization for the disabled advanced, the concept of integration for the disabled and the non-disabled has gradually developed as well. Despite efforts to improve various welfare policies for the disabled, their satisfaction level in culture and leisure activities has not significantly increased. This study aims to analyze the 10 selected design guidelines dealing with disability in order to diagnose the current status of the guidelines adaptable to inclusive park design, which can provide opportunities to access natural and cultural public spaces. From the users' point of view, the guidelines turn out not to have a balance between the disabled and the non-disabled in terms of the usage of certain spaces and they heavily focus on physical disability in adult ages. From the planning and design aspect, a specified design process is overlooked. Amenities/facilities and programs, layout and zoning are only mentioned while they are very specific about accessibility and mobility. It is necessary to establish the concept and goal of inclusive parks, and to provide specialized guidelines for inclusive parks from a more balanced perspective.

1960년대 이후 장애인의 탈시설화가 진행되면서 장애인과 비장애인이 함께 생활하는 통합의 개념이 점차 발달하였고 장애 관련 다양한 복지 제도가 개선되어 왔으나, 장애인이 문화와 여가활동을 즐길 수 있는 권리는 아직 충분히 보장되고 있지 않다. 본 연구는 장애 비장애인의 통합 환경으로서의 통합공원을 조성하기 위한 지침 마련을 위해, 기존의 장애인 관련 시설 가이드라인, 즉 접근성, 무장애, 유니버설 디자인 등을 주제로 하는 국내외 10가지 가이드라인을 이용자 측면과 계획 측면에서 분석하고, 그 내용을 고찰하였다. 이용자 측면에서는 비장애인과의 공동 이용에 대한 고려가 부족하며, 가이드라인의 내용이 신체적 장애를 가진 성인에 편중되었다는 점이 파악되었다. 또한 계획 측면에서는 조성 절차에 관련 내용이 미비하고, 배치 및 공간구성, 시설물 및 프로그램에 대한 내용이 부족한 것으로 나타났고, 접근권 및 이동권에 관한 내용 중심의 가이드라인만 제시되고 있어, 현재의 장애인시설 관련 가이드라인은 통합공원에 적용하기에는 한계를 드러내었다. 통합공원의 개념과 목표를 정립하여, 장애인과 비장애인을 함께 고려하는 균형된 관점에서 갈등 요소를 극복하고, 현실적인 통합공원 조성에 필요한 별도의 가이드라인을 마련할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Byeon, Y. C.(2008) National survey on persons with disabilities, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  2. Choi, K, H,(2010) Lives and Identity of Mothers with Disabled Children -An Analysis of the Life Cycle of Children-. Ph.D. dissertation. Kyungpook National University, Korea.
  3. Creating Inclusive Playground Network(2016) Disabled-accessible Inclusive Playground Manual. Network of Accessible Environments for All.
  4. Jeong, C. G.(2003) Research on the Realization Method of the Social Conformative Education for Disabled Children: Focusing on Incheon Metropolitan City's Cases. Master's Thesis, University of Incheon.
  5. Kang, H. J.(2010) An effect of "Friend Program" on infants' attitudes of accepting disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 12(1): 225-245.
  6. Kim, I. C.(2005) (A)Study on the Paradigm shift of Communication Design and the Fusion Design as a Subsequent Strategy. Ph.D. dissertation. Dongseo University, Korea.
  7. Kim, M. J.(2014) Growing Higher Graders in Elementary School as the Whole Person Through Project . Master's Thesis, Daegu National University of Education, Korea.
  8. Kim, S. H.(2014) National survey on persons with disabilities, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  9. Lee, H. J.(2000) Integration within general school education Activation Plan. 2000 Responsible for National Education Policy Challenges of Integrating Special Class Teacher Workshop Materials.
  10. Lee S. W., R. R. Kim, S. Y. Kim, I. K. Seo, J. W. Ahn, D. Y. Lee, E. J. Lee and Y. J. Hong(2012) The collaborative characteristic of integrated design approach -A case study on design processes in design firms. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science 25(3): 39-53.
  11. Lee, Y. M. and O. J. Kwon(2009) An analysis of previous researches on universal design in Korea. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal 18(6): 239-248.
  12. Mun, E. H.(2009) A Study on the Improvement Plans of Integrated Education for Disabled Children. Master's Thesis, Chosun University, Korea.
  13. Nam, H. G.(2017) The Assessment and Direction of Improvement on Inclusive Playground as Inclusive Environment of Handicapped Children and Non-Handicapped Children -Focused on 'Kkum-Teul Inclusive Playground' in the Seoul Children's Grand Park-. Master's Thesis, University of Seoul, Korea.
  14. Roh, S. S.(2011) A Study of the Facilities for the Disabled Person Utilization and User Satisfaction in the Neighborhood Park. Master's Thesis, Hanyang University, Korea.
  15. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2015), Survey and Schematic Planning for Barrier Free Parks in Seoul.
  16. Sung, H. C. and J. Y. Shin(2005) Strategies to improve parks' accessibility in city -Focus on Gyeonggi-do region-, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(2): 83-91.
  17. Yang, Jung-Soon(2016) The Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Landscape Lighting Design in Urban Parks, Ph.D. dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  18. Act on Guarantee of Promotion of Convenience of Persons with Disabilities, the Aged, Pregnant Women, etc.(장애인.노인.임산부 등의 편의증진 보장에 관한 법률), Korea.
  19. Act on Promotion of the Transportation Convenience of Mobility Disadvantaged Persons(교통약자의 이동편의 증진법), Korea.
  20. Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities(장애인복지법), Korea.
  21. Enforcement Rule of Act on Urban Parks, Greenbelts, etc.(도시공원 및 녹지 등에 관한 법률 시행규칙), Korea.
  22. http://bf.koddi.or.kr(Barrier Free, accessed in 2017. 3)
  23. http://chd.region.waterloo.on.ca(Region of Waterloo Public Health and Emergency Services, accessed in 2017. 3)
  24. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us(Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, accessed in 2017. 3)
  25. http://disability.seoul.go.kr(Seoul-Style Welfare, accessed in 2017. 3).
  26. http://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm(ADA.gov United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, accessed in 2017. 3)
  27. http://welfare24.net/ab-welfare_dic(Better Social Welfare World, accessed in 2016. 12)
  28. http://www.childcare.go.kr(I-sarang, accessed in 2017. 3)
  29. http://www.community.gov.yk.ca(Yukon Government, accessed in 2017. 3)
  30. http://www.easylaw.go.kr/CSP/CnpClsMain.laf?popMenu=ov&csm Seq=300&ccfNo=4&cciNo=3&cnpClsNo=1&menuType=cnpcls# (The Easy Legal Information Service, accessed in 2017. 3)
  31. http://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.jp(Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Government, accessed in 2017. 3)
  32. http://www.infrastructureontario.ca(Infrastructure Ontario, accessed in 2017. 3)
  33. http://www.korean.go.kr(National Institute of Korean Language, accessed in 2017. 3)
  34. http://www.parks.ca.gov(California Department of Parks and Recreation, accessed in 2017. 3)
  35. http://www.safetycodes.ab.ca (Safety Codes Council, accessed in 2017. 3)