DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Power of Connectivity: Cooperative Network and Firm Performance in the IT Industry

초연결시대의 협력: IT 기업 간 협력 네트워크와 성과에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.03.13
  • Accepted : 2017.06.05
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The advancement of IT and the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" blurred the boundary between industries. The importance of strategic cooperation between enterprises is emphasized. IT companies must consider their existing business areas and create new territories to drive changes in the industry. They must also secure their competitive edge and manage economic costs to enable them to compete with their global counterparts. By utilizing their resources effectively, these firms can create value through inter-firm cooperation. This study analyzes the collaborative network of global IT companies using social network analysis and examines the effect of this network on firm performance. Collaborative linkages and betweenness centrality, which represent the bridging position of a firm in a network, significantly affect firm performance. This result highlights the importance of the structural position of a firm in a cooperative network of IT companies. This study also characterizes clusters in a network of IT companies. Most of these clusters comprise a combination of IT companies in diverse IT industries. These clusters suggest that these companies engage in multilateral cooperation without boundaries to maximize their business capabilities. This study offers practical implications for establishing a cooperative strategy and framework that can capture business trends in the IT industry from a macroscopic view. This study also visualizes collaborative networks in a multifaceted way using social network analysis to provide researchers and business practitioners with an informative viewpoint.

모든 것이 이어지는 초연결시대에 기술의 융합으로 새로운 비즈니스가 생겨나고 산업의 경계가 허물어지고 있다. IT 산업의 빠른 변화에 발맞추어 기업은 기존의 사업영역을 재조정하거나 새로운 분야를 선도하는 역할이 더욱 중요해졌다. 또한 글로벌 경쟁이 심화되면서 기업은 경제적 요인을 고려하면서 보다 차별적인 경쟁우위를 확보해야만 하는 상황이다. 따라서 현존하는 자원을 효과적으로 연결하여 최적의 성과를 만들기 위한 방안으로 전방위적 협업을 통한 가치 창출에 주목해야 한다. 이에 본 연구는 특정 IT 영역 내의 기업간 협력 활동에 한정하지 않고 IT 산업 전반에 속한 주요 기업들의 협력 네트워크를 파악해 보았다. 본 연구에서 소셜 네트워크 분석 기법을 활용하여 주요 IT 기업들의 협력 네트워크를 분석하여 성과와의 관계를 살펴본 결과는 다음과 같다. 우선 기업들의 협력 네트워크의 수와 함께 네트워크상에서 중개자 역할을 표현하는 척도인 매개중심성이 성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 네트워크 양적 측면에서 협력의 수뿐만 아니라, 구조적 관점을 고려하며 기업이 네트워크 내에서 어떠한 포지션에 위치해 있는지도 주의를 기울여야 한다는 것이다. 또한 협력 네트워크의 클러스터 분석을 실시해 본 결과, 다양한 IT 영역에서 활동하는 기업들이 밀접하게 연결되어 클러스터를 구성하고 있었다. 이는 주요 기업들이 IT 영역 간 경계를 넘어서 전방위적 협력 관계를 구축하며 경영 활동의 효과를 극대화하고 실제 기업 성과로 연결시키고 있다는 점이다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 4차 산업혁명 시대의 흐름을 반영하여 IT 분야 간 경계를 초월하며 형성되는 협력의 의미를 기존의 네트워크 이론을 통해 재조명해 본다는 의미가 있다. 본 연구 결과는 기업이 새로운 현상을 포착하여 가치를 창출하기 위한 방안으로 다양한 파트너와의 협업 전략을 고려하는데 있어 시사점을 제공할 수 있다. 또한 실제 주요 IT 기업의 협력 관계를 네트워크 분석을 통해 가시화하여 나타냄으로써 IT 비즈니스 관련 연구와 실무진에게 보다 입체적이고 다양한 관점을 제시해 줄 것으로 기대해 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahuja, G., "Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, 2000a, pp. 425-455.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
  2. Ahuja, G., "The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.3, 2000b, pp. 317-343.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-B
  3. Arora, A. and A. Gambardella, "Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology", The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.38, No.40, 1990, pp. 361-379.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2098345
  4. Bae, J. and M. G. Insead, "Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, No.6, 2004, pp. 843-859.  https://doi.org/10.5465/20159626
  5. Baum, J. A., T. Calabrese, and B. S. Silverman, "Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.3, 2000, pp. 267-294.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8
  6. Berg, S. V., J. Duncan, and P. Friedman, Joint Venture Strategies and Corporate Innovation, Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Cambridge, Mass, 1982. 
  7. Borgatti, S. P. and P. C. Foster, "The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology", Journal of Management, Vol.29, No.6, 2003, pp. 991-1013.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
  8. Burt, R. S., "The social structure of competition", Explorations in Economic Sociology, Vol.65, 1993, pp. 103. 
  9. Chae, S. W., "The analyses of successful strategy for internet portals: From the analyses of M&A cases", Information Systems Review, Vol.9, No.2, 2007, pp. 85-108. 
  10. Clauset, A., M. E. Newman, and C. Moore, "Finding community structure in very large networks", Physical Review E, Vol.70, No.6, 2004, pp. 066111. 
  11. Doz, Y. L., "The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes?", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, No.S1, 1996, pp. 55-83.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171006
  12. Freeman, L. C., "A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness", Sociometry, Vol.40, No.1, 1977, pp. 35-41.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
  13. Freeman, L. C., "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification", Social Networks, Vol.1, No.3, 1978, pp. 215-239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  14. Granovetter, M. S., "The strength of weak ties", American Journal of Sociology, Vol.78, No.6, 1973, pp. 1360-1380.  https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  15. Gulati, R., "Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, No.4, 1995, pp. 619-652.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393756
  16. Gulati, R. and M. Gargiulo, "Where do interorganizational networks come from?", American Journal of Sociology, Vol.104, No.5, 1999, pp. 177-231.  https://doi.org/10.1086/210179
  17. Hansen, D., B. Shneiderman, and M. A. Smith, Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, Massachusetts, US, 2010. 
  18. James, C., Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1990. 
  19. Jiang, R. J., Q. T. Tao, and M. D. Santoro, "Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.31, No.10, 2010, pp. 1136-1144.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.869
  20. Kale, P., J. H. Dyer, and H. Singh, "Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23, No.8, 2002, pp. 747-767.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.248
  21. Koh, J. and N. Venkatraman, "Joint venture formations and stock market reactions: An assessment in the information technology sector", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.34, No.4, 1991, pp. 869-892. https://doi.org/10.5465/256393
  22. Lee S. J., "The effect of collaboration and organization's performance depending on the partnership by information technology using level: Key subject is moderating variable of information technology using level", Information Systems Review, Vol.11, No.2, 2009, pp. 67-90. 
  23. Newman, M. E., "A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks", Social Networks, Vol.27, No.1, 2005, pp. 39-54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009
  24. Phelps, C. C., "A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.53, No.4, 2010, pp. 890-913.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.52814627
  25. Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr, "Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.41, No.1, 1996, pp. 116-145.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
  26. Ring, P. S. and A. H. Van de Ven, "Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships", Academy of Management Review, Vol.19, No.1, 1994, pp. 90-118.  https://doi.org/10.2307/258836
  27. Rowley, T., D. Behrens, and D. Krackhardt, "Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.1, 2000, pp. 369-386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M
  28. Sampson, R. C., "R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.50, No.2, 2007, pp. 364-386.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634443
  29. Schilling, M. A. and C. C. Phelps, "Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation", Management Science, Vol.53, No.7, 2007, pp. 1113-1126.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
  30. Soda, G., A. Usai, and A. Zaheer, "Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, No.6, 2004, pp. 893-906.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159629
  31. Stuart, T. E., "Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.8, 2000, pp. 791-811.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-K
  32. Walker, G., B. Kogut, and W. Shan, "Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network", Organization Science, Vol.8, No.2, 1997, pp. 109-125.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.2.109
  33. Zaheer, A. and G. G. Bell, "Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.26, No.9, 2005, pp. 809-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482