References
- 국가과학기술심의회 (2016), 국가연구개발 과제평가 표준지침 개정(안), 국가과학기술심의회 운영위원회
- 김동광 (2002), 생명공학과 시민참여: 재조합 DNA 논쟁에 대한 사례연구, 과학기술학연구, 2(1)
- 김승태, 김성진, 황덕규, 이기종 (2009), 국가연구개발사업 성과평가 제도개선을 위한 정책적 시사점 도출, 한국정책분석평가학회 하계학술대회
- 김왕동, 성지은, 송위진 (2014), 사회문제 해결형 R&D를 위한 출연연의 평가시스템 개선방향, 과학기술학연구, 14(1)
- 김윤명, 유화선 (2016), 국가연구개발사업 성과평가 정책 실증분석 및 발전방안 연구, 기술혁신학회지, 19(1): 191-229
- 김태희 (2010), 평가위원간 네트워크가 국가연구개발사업의 효율성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 기술혁신학회지, 13(4): 794-816
- 김태희 (2015), 과학기술과 사회 연계에 대한 담론, 과학기술학연구, 15(2): 400-420
- 류영수, 최병대, 최상옥 (2014), The Design and Application of a Meta-evaluation Model for National R&D Program, 기술혁신학회지, 17(4): 703-732
- 박상욱 (2005), 평가위원 평가이력 구축관리 및 활용방안, 과학기술학 연구, 한국과학기술기획평가원 에세이, 서울
- 사재명 (2006), 정책과정에서 시민참여의 활성화 방안, 한국행정과 정책연구, 4(1)
- 서인덕, 이상길 (2011), 인사평가 만족도의 영향요인에 관한 연구, 경영사학, 26(4): 257-286
- 성지은, 김미, 임홍탁, 김은정 (2014), 연구개발사업의 사회적 파급효과 분석 가능성과 과제, 과학기술학 연구, 14(2), 한국과학기술학회
- 송위진, 성지은, 임홍탁, 장영배 (2013), 사회문제 해결형 연구개발사업 발전방안 연구, 정책연구, 과학기술정책연구원
- 신희권 외 (2001), 시민행정과 정부, 대영문화사
- 윤석환, 이진석 (2012), 연구개발 평가자의 선정에 관한 연구, 한국공공관리학보, 26(3): 291-313
- 이민형 (2001), 정부출연연구기관 성과평가 지표체계 분석, 과학기술정책연구원
- 이영희 (2012), 전문성의 정치와 사회운동, 경제와 사회, 93
- 이영희 (2014), 과학기술 시티즌십의 두 유형과 전문성의 정치, 동향과 전망, 92
- 이찬구 (2011), 연구개발평가의 전문성 향상 방안, 한국행정학회하계학술대회
- 이찬구 (2005), 정부출연 연구기관 평가에서 지적자본 모형의 적용 필요성, 한국행정학보, 39(1): 195-217
- 최원재, 김유빈, 강근복 (2016), 우리나라 국가연구개발 성과평가제도 변동의 맥락과 영향에 관한 연구, 한국기술혁신학회추계학술대회
- 한재각 (2004), 국가연구개발사업 개혁을 위한 시민사회의 시각: 분석틀과 평가기준의 제안, 과학기술학연구, 4(2), 한국과학기술학회
- 한재각, 장영배 (2009), 과학기술 시민참여의 새로운 유형: 수행되지 않은 과학 하기, 과학기술학 연구, 9(1)
- 홍성걸 (2007), 국가연구개발사업 평가시스템에 대한 메타평가 연구, 국민대학교 국정관리전략연구소
- 황명구, 유왕진, 정동우, 문종범 (2009), 메타평가를 적용한 국가 연구 개발사업 평가시스템의 효율성 분석 모형 개발, 벤처창업연구, 4(4): 1-25
- Banthien, H and Herz, J. (2001), "Evaluation of internet-based discourses concerning innovation and technical analyses", discussion paper, conference e-society, Berlin.
- Beck, Ulrich (1992), The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications
- Benhabib (1996), Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy, Princeton University Press
- Brown, M. (2009), Science in democracy, MIT, USA
- Burdy, R. (2003), "Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action", Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1): 33-49 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976292
- Burton, P. (2009), "Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Issues in Measuring the Benefits of Public Participation", Evaluation, 15(3): 263-284 https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389009105881
- Campbell, D. (1988), Qualitative knowing in action research. In E. S. Overman (Ed.), Methodology and epistemology for social science. Selected papers: Donald T. Campbell (pp. 360-376). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Cohen, J. (1989), Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, The Good Polity, London: Blackwell
- Dryzek, J. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Elkin, S. L. and Soltan, K. E. (1999), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press
- Foreman-Peck, L. & Travers, K. (2015), "Developing expertise in managing dialogue in the 'third space': Lessons from a responsive participatory evaluation", Evaluation, 21(3): 344-358 https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015592492
- Frankenfeld, Philip J. (1992), "Technological citizenship: A normative framework for risk studies", Science, Technology & Human Values, 17: 459-484 https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700403
- Fuller, S. (2008), Dissent over descent: intelligent design's challenge to Darwinism, Cambridgeshire: Icon
- Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. (1993), "Science for the post-normal age", Futures, 25: 739-755 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
- Greene, J. (2000), Challenges in Practicing Deliberative Democratic Evaluation, SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
- Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press
- Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Hanberger, A. (2001), "Policy and Program Evaluation, Civil Society and Democracy", American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2): 211-228 https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200205
- Hanberger, A. (2006), "Evaluation of and for Democracy", Evaluation, 12(1): 17-37 https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064194
- Hornig, Susannah (1990), "Television's NOVA and the construction of scientific truth", Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7
- House, E. and Howe, K. (1999), Values in Evaluation and Social Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
- Huntington, S. P. and Nelson, J. M. (1976), No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries, Harvard University Press
- Irwin, A. (2006), "The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with New Scientific Governance", Social Studies of Science, 36(2): 299-320 https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350
- Jasanoff, Sheila (2012), Science and Public Reason, Routledge, New York
- Jasanoff, S. (2004), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
- Laat B. (2013), The tricky triangle: Evaluator, evaluand, evaluation commissioner, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
- Latour, B. (2004), Politics of Nature, Havard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London
- Lengwiler, M. (2008), "Participatory approaches in science and technology", Science, Technology and Human Values, 33: 186-200 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262
- MacDonald, B. (1976), Evaluation and the control of education, Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications, London: Macmillan
- McTaggart, R. (1991), "When Democratic Evaluation Doesn't Seem Democratic", Evaluation Practice, 12(1): 9-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(91)90019-T
- Mertens D. & Wilson, A. (2012), Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Guide, New York: Guilford
- Murray, R. (2002), "Citizens' Control of Evaluations", Evaluation, 8(1): 81-100 https://doi.org/10.1177/1358902002008001488
- Norris, Nigel (2015), "Democratic evaluation: The work and ideas of Barry MacDonald", Evaluation, 21(2): 135-142 https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015577510
- Nowotny, H. (2003), "Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge", Science and Public Policy, 30: 151-156 https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780461
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001), Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, London
- Ostrom, E. (2000), "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3): 137-158 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137
- Oudheusden, M. (2014), "Where are the politics in responsible innovation?", Responsible Innovation, 1: 67-86 https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
- Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Patton, M. (1997), Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
- Paxton, P. (1999), "Is Social Capital Declining in the United States?", American Journal of Sociology, 105(1): 88-127 https://doi.org/10.1086/210268
- Preskill, H. & Torres, R. (2000), "The learning dimension of evaluation use", New Direction for Program Evaluation, 88: 25-37
- Rawls, J. (1993), Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press
- Robien, C. (1996), "Participatory Evaluation of Development Assistance: Dealing with Power and Facilitative Learning", Evaluation, 2(2): 151-171 https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909600200203
- Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2005), "Evaluating public participation exercises: Strategic and practical issues", In Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (Ed.), Evaluating public participation in policy making, 85-108
- Saurugger, S. (2010), "The social construction of the participatory turn: The emergence of a norm in the European Union", European Journal of Political Research, 49: 471-495 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01905.x
- Scriven, M. (2001), "Evaluation: Future tense", American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3): 301-307 https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200303
- Schwartzenberg, R. G. (2001), Dix mesures pour rapprocher science et societe, http://www.recherche.gouv.fr/discours/2001/voeux.htm
- Shoenefeld, J. & Jordan, A. (2017), "Governing policy evaluation? Towards a new typology", Evaluation, 23(3): 274-293 https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389017715366
- Sirianni, C. and Fiedland, L. (2001), Civic Innovation in America, London: University of California Press
- Urbinati, N. (2006), Representative Democracy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Valenti, JoAnn & Wilkins, Lee (1995), "An ethical risk communication protocol for science and mass communications", Public Understanding of Science 4
- Weiss, C. (1977), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, Lexington MA: D.C. Health
- Weiss, C. (1998), "Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation?", American Journal of Evaluation, 19:21-33 https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409801900103
- Wynne, Brian (1992), "Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and the public uptake of science", Public Understanding of Science, 1: 281-304 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
- Young, M. (2001), "Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy", Political Studies 29(5): 670-690