Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Microleakage and Penetration Ability of Flowable Resin in Occlusal Fissure

유동성 레진의 교합면 열구내 침투도와 미세누출 평가

  • Cheong, Hyeran (Department of Dental Hygiene, Dong-A College of Health) ;
  • Im, Sungok (Graduate School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sangho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Nanyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 정혜란 (동아보건대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 임성옥 (조선대학교 대학원 치의학과) ;
  • 이상호 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이난영 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2016.11.11
  • Accepted : 2016.12.27
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compared the penetration scores and microleakage levels of flowable resin in comparison to resin-based pit and fissure sealant. A total 120 extracted premolars were used and classified with group I (resin-based pit and fissure sealant), group II (flowable resin), group III (bonding agent + flowable resin), IV (fissurotomy + bonding agent + flowable resin) depending on the materials and the application methods. The penetration scores of the group treated with flowable resin following fissurotomy were similar to those of the group treated with resin-based sealant, but higher compared to those of the other groups treated with flowable resin without fissurotomy or bonding agent. The group treated with flowable resin following fissurotomy also exhibited the lowest microleakage levels. The group treated with resin-based sealant and the one treated with a bonding agent prior to the application of flowable resin showed similar microleakage levels. In conclusion, flowable resin may be applied as a pit and fissure sealant, and its application along with fissurotomy could increase the penetration scores.

본 연구의 목적은 유동성 레진의 교합면 열구에서의 침투도와 미세누출을 평가하여 치면열구전색제로서의 사용 가능성을 규명해 보고자 하는데 있다. 발거된 120개 치아를 4개 군으로 분류하고 I군은 대조군으로 레진계 치면열구전색제로 전색, II군은 유동성 레진으로 전색, III군은 상아질접착제를 도포한 후 유동성 레진으로 전색, IV군은 열구성형술을 시행하고 상아질접착제를 도포한 후 유동성 레진으로 전색하여 열구 내로의 침투도와 미세누출을 비교 평가하고 주사전자현미경으로 침투 및 접착상태를 관찰하였다. 유동성 레진의 열구내 침투도나 미세누출은 레진계 전색제에 비해 낮게 나타났으나 상아질접착제를 도포하거나 열구성형술을 시행한 후 상아질접착제를 도포한 경우는 레진계 전색제와 침투도의 차이가 없었으며 미세누출은 더 작게 나타났다. 주사전자현미경상에서 열구의 형태나 열구성형술의 여부에 따라 침투도의 차이가 관찰되었으며 상아질접착제를 사용하지 않은 일부 유동성 레진 시편에서는 법랑질 표면과 긴밀한 접착이 이루어지지 않았다. 이상의 결과를 종합해보면 유동성 레진은 치면열구전색제로서의 적용이 가능하며 열구성형술과 상아질접착제를 사용한다면 침투도를 높이고 미세누출을 줄일 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jodkowska E : Efficacy of pit and fissure sealing: Long-term clinical observations. Quintesse Int, 39:593-602, 2008.
  2. Splieth CH, Ekstrand KR, Alkilzy A : Sealant in dentistry: Outcomes of the ORCA saturday afternoon symposium 2007. Caries Res, 44:3-13, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271591
  3. Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, et al. : Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent, 38:282-308, 2016.
  4. Lee SH : Retention of pit and fissure sealant. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 33:336-347. 2006.
  5. Yilmaz Y, Belduz N, Eyuboglu OA : Two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 11:88-92, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262718
  6. Reddy VR, Chowdhary N, Mukunda KS, et al. : Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: A comparative clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent, 6(Suppl 1):S18-23, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.152932
  7. Autio-Gold JT : Clinical evaluation of a mediumfilled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant. Oper Dent, 27:325-329, 2002.
  8. Dhar V, Chen H : Evaluation of resin based and glass ionomer based sealants placed with or without tooth preparation-a two year clinical trial. Pediatr Dent, 34:46-50, 2012.
  9. Gunjal S, Nagesh L, Raju HG : Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res, 23:320-325, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.102214
  10. Holmgren C, Gaucher C, Decerle N, et al. : Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 3. Management of non-cavitated (initial) occlusal caries lesions-noninvasive approaches through remineralisation and therapeutic sealants. Br Dent J, 216:237-243, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.147
  11. Chaitra TR, Subba Reddy VV, Devarasa GM, et al. : Flowable resin used as a sealant in molars using conventional, enameloplasty and fissurotomy techniques: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 28:145-150, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.73786
  12. Oba AA, Sonmez I, Ercan E, et al. : Comparison of retention rates of fissure sealants using two flowable restorative materials and a conventional resin sealant: two-year follow-up. Med Princ Pract, 21:234-237, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333561
  13. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, et al. : Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: A 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. J Dentistry, 42:149-157, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015
  14. Aguilar FG, Drubi-Filho B, Casemiro LA, et al. : Retention and penetration of a conventional resinbased sealant and a photochromatic flowable composite resin placed on occlusal pits and fissures. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 25:169-173, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.37012
  15. Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, Fallahi S : Retention of a Flowable composite resin in comparison to a conventional resin-based sealant: One-year follow-up. J Dent(Tehran), 7:1-5, 2010.
  16. Chaitra TR, Subba Reddy W, Ravishankar TL, et al. : Microleakage and SEM analysis of flowable resin used as a sealant following three fissure preparation techniques-An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 35:277-282, 2011. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.35.3.7x217772q7146288
  17. Hevinga MA, Opdam NJ, Truin GJ, et al. : Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures. J Dent, 35:909-914, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.001
  18. Nagano T : The form of pit and fissure and the primary lesion of caries. Dent Abstract, 6:426, 1960.
  19. Gerwal N, Chopra R : The effect of fissure morphology and eruption time on penetration and adaptation of pit and fissure sealants: An SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent, 26:59-63, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.41617
  20. Banerjee A, Thompson ID, F Watson T : Minimally invasive caries removal using bio-active glass airabrasion. J Dent, 39:2-7, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.004
  21. Kakaboura A, Matthaiou L, Papagiannoulis L : In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 3:205-209, 2002.
  22. Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S : Evaluation of different fissure sealant materials and flowable composites used as pit-and-fissure sealants: A 24 month clinical trial. Pediatr Dent, 37:468-473, 2015.
  23. Duangthip D, Lussi A : Variables contributing to the quality of fissure sealants used by general dental practitioners. Oper Dent, 28:756-764, 2003.
  24. Prabhakar AR, Murthy SA, Sugandhan S : Comparative evaluation of the length of resin tags, viscosity and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants-an in vitro scanning electron microscope study. Contemp Clin Dent, 2:324-330, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.91797
  25. Beun S, Bailly C, Devaux J, Leloup G : Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resinbased pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites. Dent Mater, 28:349-359, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.001
  26. Burrow MF, Burrow JF, Makinson OF : Pits and fissures: Etch resistance in prismless enamel walls. Aust Dent J, 46:258-262, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00289.x
  27. Cho TS, Lee SH, Yoon JH, Kim SG : Ultra-structure and etching characteristics of occlusal fissure enamel. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 32:321-331, 2005.
  28. Mehrabkhani M, Mazhari F, Sadeghi S, Ebrahimi M : Effects of sealant, viscosity, and bonding agents on microleakage of fissure sealants: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent, 9:558-5, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.172631
  29. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, et al. : Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res, 79:1850-1856, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790110601
  30. Gillet D, Nancy J, Dupuis V, et al. : Microleakage and penetration depth of three types of materials in fissure sealant: self-etching primer vs etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26:175-178, 2002.
  31. Bagherian A, Akbari M, Rezaeian M, Ansari G : Microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following fissurotomy bur or pumice prophylaxis use before etching. Dent Res J, 10:643-646, 2013.
  32. Singla A, Garg S, Jindal SK, et al. : In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant. Indian J Dent Res, 22:205-209, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.84286
  33. Duangthip D, Lussi A : Effects of application techniques and fissure types on the in vitro performance of two fissure sealants. Am J Dent, 17:137-142, 2004.
  34. Asefi S, Eskandarion S, Hamidiaval S : Fissure sealant materials: Wear resistance of flowable composite resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 10:194-199, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.031