DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지역 커뮤니티 재생을 통한 도시재생사업의 성과와 문제점 연구 - 영국의 커뮤니티 재생 사례를 중심으로 -

A Study on Urban Regeneration by Community Regeneration - Focussing on Community Regeneration Projects in the U.K -

  • 투고 : 2016.11.12
  • 심사 : 2017.02.19
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28

초록

This study examines theories of communities' roles and responsibilities in regeneration at deprived residential communities, focusing on the elements required for social regeneration and analysing recent regeneration works in the U.K in order to suggest strategic implication for regeneration of the deprived local communities in Korea, whose redevelopment opportunities have been being faded away thanks to economic down-turn. The paper has reviewed two different projects: a Mayor's Crowdfunding Programme, collaborating between Greater London Authority and the local communities, and Coin Street Neighborhood Centre for 4 Housing Co-ops in the Southbank area. Due to increasing demand of social activities and dynamic urban changes, sustainable social regeneration has become as crucial as economic and architectural regeneration. Through the analysis on both projects the paper identifies design elements and indicators that make regeneration process socially sustainable, with active support from public bodies such as GLA or Coin Street's groups and active participation by urban communities, who has been deliberately trained to drive local agendas to successful regeneration. The reduced public subsidy in the U.K has created string demand of creative community education software and self-driving ability of liasing local possibilities and hidden potentials.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 경남대학교

참고문헌

  1. Baugh, G. & Elington, C. (1985). A History of Country of Shripshire Vol 11 Telford, Victoria County History, 15-19
  2. Bibby, A. (2001). Coin Street: Case Study, University of East London, from http://www,andrewbibby.com/socialenterprise/coin-street
  3. Brundtland, GH. (1987). World Commission on Environm ent and Development, Oxford University Press, 41-51
  4. Burton, K. & Waddell, K. (2006). Is work good for your health & well-bing, London TSO, 13
  5. Calantonio, A. & Dixon, T. (2009). Measuring Socially s ustainable urban regeneration in Europe, Oxford Brookes University OSID, 78-82
  6. Choi, P. (2010). A Study on the Improvement of Residen ts Participation for the effective Promotion of the Urban I mprovement Project, The Korean Regional Development A ssociation, 22(4), 72-73
  7. DETR. (1999). Towards An Urban Renaissance, E & FN Spon Taylor & Francis Group plc, 140-143
  8. Egan, J. (2004). The Egan Review, Office of Deputy Prime Minister UK, 19-20 & 92-93
  9. Han, S. & Kim, J. (2016). Participation and Role of Private Business Sector in Urban Regeneration Project-Focuss on Analysis of Urban Regeneration Governance and Leading Developer in the UK, 17(3), Seoul Studies, 30
  10. Imrie, R., Lees, L. & Raco, M. (2009). Regenerating London, Routledge, 237-253
  11. Kim, D. & Lee, Y. (2011). Types of Conflict Factors and Conflict Management in Housing Redevelopment Program, Journal of the Korea Planning Association 46(7), 21-22
  12. Kim, K., Kim, T., Cinn, E. & Kim, H. (2002). A Study on the Public Space and Formation in the Contemporary Housing Community - Focussed on Europan 5, 18(5), Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 66
  13. Langston, C. (2014). Measuring Good Architecture: Long life, loose fit, low energy, European Journal of Sustainable De velopment, 165-170
  14. Poplin, DE. (1979). The Concept of Community : A survey of Theories and Methods of Research, Macmillan Pub Co, 18-19
  15. PRP., URBED. & DfH. (2008). Beyond Eco Towns Appl ying the lesson from Europe, PRP Architects, 23-27
  16. Staint, A. (1987). Towards a Social Architecture: the role of school building in post-war England, Yale University Press, 22-23
  17. Susman, B. (1959). Community Structure and Analysis, Crowell, 163-172
  18. Thornhill, J. (2009). Transforming Estates, ECOTEC and Chartered Institute of Housing, 35-40
  19. Warbis, M. (2015). Understanding the social impacts of t he Mayor's Crowdfunding Programme, Greater London Authority, 20-21