Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Possibility of Cyber Art Education : Focusing on a Drawing Course

사이버 미술교육의 가능성 연구 : 드로잉 수업을 중심으로

  • Jue, Juliet (Department of Art Therapy, Hanyang Cyber University)
  • 주리애 (한양사이버대학교 미술치료학과)
  • Received : 2016.12.05
  • Accepted : 2017.01.06
  • Published : 2017.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the possibility of developing a drawing course in online education and to assess the satisfaction and dissatisfaction of students. The drawing class consisted of a conceptual understanding of the drawing, learning actual techniques and performing drawing tasks. This course was rated on the content satisfaction scale and the course evaluation scale when it was developed in 2014 and partially modified in 2016. Both the content satisfaction and lecture evaluation showed similar scores to the average for all subjects in the school. Specifically, 'organization of content' received good reviews, while 'interaction' received a low rating in the content satisfaction scale. Additionally, 'enthusiasm' and 'response sincerity of teacher' received high ratings, but 'overall satisfaction' was low in the course evaluation scale. Finally, the self-assessment of students was also low. These results indicate that students want more practice and more active interactions.

본 연구는 미술 실기 교육인 드로잉 수업을 사이버 강의를 통해 어느 정도로 구현할 수 있으며 학습자 입장에서 만족과 불만족 요인은 무엇인지 살펴보고자 했다. 드로잉 수업은 드로잉에 대한 개념적인 이해와 실제 기법을 학습하며 과제를 수행하도록 구성되었다. 드로잉 과목을 개발한 2014년과 부분 수정을 거친 2016년에 콘텐츠 만족도 평가와 강의 평가를 통해 과목 평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 콘텐츠 만족도와 강의 평가 모두 학교에 개설된 전체 과목들의 평균과 유사한 점수를 보였다. 세부적으로 보면, 콘텐츠 만족도에서 강의 내용 구성은 좋은 평가를 받았지만 상호작용은 낮은 평가를 받았다. 강의평가의 경우 교수의 열의와 응답 성실성은 높은 평가를 받았지만, 강의에 대한 전반적 만족도는 낮은 편이었다. 또한, 학생들의 자기 평가도 낮은 편이었다. 이러한 결과는 학생들이 더 많은 실습에 대한 요구를 가지고 있으며, 더 적극적인 상호작용을 원한다는 것을 의미한다. 본 연구는 사이버 교육 환경에서 미술 실기 교과를 시도했다는 점에서 의의를 가진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea education and research information service, Our classroom revolution: The current status and development direction of smart education. Seoul: KERIS, 2011.
  2. Jiyeon Lee, Applying apps into art education setting in a smart learning environment. Art Education Research Review, 29(4), pp. 46-66, 2015.
  3. Sungho Choi, A study on the status of design practice education of cyber university. Journal of Korean Society of Public Design, 2(1), pp. 75-86, 2007.
  4. Hyunseok Sim, Heejeong Lim, A study on the effectiveness of smart learning in education training, Journal of Cyber Education, 7(2), pp. 139-160, 2013.
  5. M. G. Moore, Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 1-7, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526645
  6. V. P. Dennen, A. A. Darabi, L. J. Smith, Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), pp. 65-79, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305319
  7. R. D. Johnson, S. Hornik, E. Salas, An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-computer studies, 66, pp. 356-369, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
  8. L. A. Sutton, Vicarious interaction: A learning theory for computer-mediated communication. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA, 2000.
  9. P. Kawachi, Vicarious interaction and the achieved quality of learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 2(4), pp. 39-45. 2003.
  10. Insung Jung, Exploring success factors of virtual education at the tertiary level based on the analysis of experiences in virtual education worldwide. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), pp. 215-233, 2002. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.18.1.215