1 |
M. G. Moore, Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 1-7, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526645
DOI
|
2 |
V. P. Dennen, A. A. Darabi, L. J. Smith, Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), pp. 65-79, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305319
DOI
|
3 |
R. D. Johnson, S. Hornik, E. Salas, An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-computer studies, 66, pp. 356-369, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
DOI
|
4 |
L. A. Sutton, Vicarious interaction: A learning theory for computer-mediated communication. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA, 2000.
|
5 |
P. Kawachi, Vicarious interaction and the achieved quality of learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 2(4), pp. 39-45. 2003.
|
6 |
Insung Jung, Exploring success factors of virtual education at the tertiary level based on the analysis of experiences in virtual education worldwide. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), pp. 215-233, 2002.
DOI
|
7 |
Hyunseok Sim, Heejeong Lim, A study on the effectiveness of smart learning in education training, Journal of Cyber Education, 7(2), pp. 139-160, 2013.
|
8 |
Sungho Choi, A study on the status of design practice education of cyber university. Journal of Korean Society of Public Design, 2(1), pp. 75-86, 2007.
|
9 |
Korea education and research information service, Our classroom revolution: The current status and development direction of smart education. Seoul: KERIS, 2011.
|
10 |
Jiyeon Lee, Applying apps into art education setting in a smart learning environment. Art Education Research Review, 29(4), pp. 46-66, 2015.
|