DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Privacy Concern and Institutional Trust on Privacy Decision Making: A Comparison of E-Commerce and Location-Based Service

프라이버시 염려와 제도적 신뢰가 프라이버시 의사결정에 미치는 영향: 전자상거래와 위치기반서비스의 비교

  • Received : 2016.11.30
  • Accepted : 2017.02.21
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

This Research Attempted to Clarify the Eeffect of Privacy Concern and Institutional Trust on Privacy Decision based on Privacy Calculus Perspective. We Developed a Research Model Suggesting that the Influence of Privacy Benefit and Privacy risk on the Information Disclosure Behavior and the Influence of Privacy Concern and Institutional Trust on the Privacy Calculus. In this Regard, in Order to Examine the Difference According to the Target whose Personal Information was Collected, an Empirical Analysis was Conducted to Compare the E-commerce Field and LBS(Location Based Service) Field. The Results of Empirical Analysis are as follows. First, it is Founded that other Relations were All Statistically Significant Except the Relation between Privacy Risk and Information Disclosure Behavior in the LBS group. Next, as a Results of Comparison of Constructs in the E-commerce and Institutional trust than the LBS group, Identifying that the Consumers are more Sensitive to the Personal Information Collected in the E-commerce site.

본 연구에서는 프라이버시 염려와 제도적 신뢰가 프라이버시 의사결정에 미치는 영향에 대하여 프라이버시 계산 이론을 중심으로 규명하고자 하였다. 프라이버시 계산 이론을 기반으로 프라이버시 이익과 프라이버시 위험이 정보제공행동에 미치는 영향에 대해 파악하고, 프라이버시 염려와 제도적 신뢰가 프라이버시 계산에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 이때, 개인정보를 수집하는 대상에 따른 차이를 파악하기 위해 전자상거래 분야와 위치기반서비스 분야에 대한 비교를 하고자 실증분석을 실시하였다. 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 먼저, 위치기반서비스 그룹에서 프라이버시 위험과 정보제공행동 간의 관계를 제외하고 다른 인과관계는 모두 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 다음으로 전자상거래와 위치기반서비스 그룹에 있어 구성개념의 차이를 분석한 결과, 프라이버시 염려의 구성요인인 인식구성개념을 제외하고는 모두 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 전자상거래 그룹이 위치기반서비스 그룹에 비해 프라이버시 염려가 높고 제도적 신뢰가 낮은 것으로 나타나 소비자가 전자상거래 사이트에서 수집되는 개인정보에 대해 더욱 민감하다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., and H. Xu, “Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 989-1015, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970
  2. Dinev, T. and Hart, P., “An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 61-80, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
  3. Liao, C., Liu, C., and Chen, K., "Examining the Impact of Privacy, Trust and Risk Perceptions beyond Monetary Transactions: An Integrated Model," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 10, pp. 702-715, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.003
  4. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., and Burke, S. J., “Information Privacy Measuring Individuals’ Concerns about Organizational Practices,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 67-196, 1996.
  5. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., and Agarwal, J., “Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns(IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 336-355, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
  6. Dinev, T. and Hart, P., "Internet Privacy Concerns and Their Antecedents-Measurement Validity and a Regression Model," Behavior and Information Technology, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 413-422, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001715723
  7. Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A. N., and Reips, U., “Development of Measures of Online Privacy Concern and Protection for Use on the Internet,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 157- 165, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20459
  8. Rotter, J. B., “Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust,” American Psychologist, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 443-452, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464
  9. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C., “Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-Commerce: An Integrative Topology,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 334-359, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  10. Mayer, R., Davis, J., and Schoorman, F., “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 709-734, 1995. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  11. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L., “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 472-490, 1998.
  12. Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., and Colautti, C., "Privacy Calculus Model in E-Commerce - A Study of Italy and the United States," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 389-402, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000590
  13. McCole, P., Ramsey, E., and Williams, J., "Trust Considerations on Attitudes toward Online Purchasing: The Moderating Effect of Privacy and Security Concerns," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, pp. 1018-1024, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.025
  14. Kim, J. and Kim, J., “A Study of the Causes of Information Privacy Concerns and Protective Responses in e-Commerce: Focusing on the Principal-Agent Theory,” The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 119-145, 2014a. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2014.23.4.119
  15. Culnan, M. J. and Bies, R. J., “Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations,” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 323-342, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00067
  16. Li, H., Sarathy, R., and Xu, H., “Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 62-71, 2010.
  17. Xu, H., Luo, X., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B., “The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Exploratory Study of Decision Making Process for Location-Aware Marketing,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 42-52, 2011b.
  18. Kim, J. and Kim, S., "The Effect of Relationships between Justice and Privacy Calculus on Intention to Disclose Personal Information," The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 45-67, 2014b
  19. Krasnova, H. and Veltri, N. F., "Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: Explorative Evidence from Germany and USA," Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1-10, 2010.
  20. Phelps, J., Nowak, G., and Ferrell, E., “Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 27-41, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941
  21. Bies, R. J. and Moag, J. S., "Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness," in M. Bazerman, R. Lewicki, and B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 43-55, 1986.
  22. Greenberg, J., "Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow," Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 399-432, 1990.
  23. Xu, H. and Teo, H., "Alleviating Consumers' Privacy Concerns in Location-Based Services: A Psychological Control Perspective," Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 793-806, 2004.
  24. Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., and Hart, P., “Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 798-824, 2011a. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00281
  25. Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., and Passerini, K., "Trust and Privacy Concern within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace," Proceedings of the Thirteenth AMCIS, 2007.
  26. Bansal, G., Zahedi, F., and Gefen, D., “The Impact of Personal Dispositions on Information Sensitivity, Privacy Concern and Trust in Disclosing Health Information Online,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 138-150, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010
  27. Belanger, F., Hiller, J. S., and Smith, W. J., “Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Privacy, Security, and Site Attributes,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, pp. 245-270, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00018-5
  28. Pavlou, P., Liang, H., and Xue, Y., “Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principle-Agent Perspective,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 105-136, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783
  29. Wakefield, R., “The Influence of User Affect in Online Information Disclosure,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 157-174, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2013.01.003
  30. Van Slyke, C., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., and Jiang, K., “Concerns for Information Privacy and Online Consumer Purchasing,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 415-444, 2006. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00092
  31. Teo, T. S. H. and Liu, J., "Consumer Trust in E-commerce in the United States, Singapore, and China," The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 22-38, 2007.
  32. Lee, H. and Lee, S., “Analysis of Previous Studies on Information Privacy - Aimed at Drawing Trends and Future Direction of Information Privacy-related Studies,” Informatization Policy, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 3-26, 2009.
  33. Li, H., Sarathy, R., and Xu, H., “The Role of Affect and Cognition on Online Consumers’ Decision to Disclose Personal Information to Unfamiliar Online Vendors,” Decision Support systems, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 434-445, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.01.017
  34. Li, H., Gupta, A., Zhang, J., and Sarathy, R., "Examining the Decision to Use Standalone Personal Health Record Systems as a Trust-Enabled Fair Social Contract," Decision Supports Systems, Vol. 57, pp. 376-386, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.043
  35. Li, Y., "Empirical Studies on Online Information Privacy Concerns: Literature Review and an Integrative Framework," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 28, pp. 453-496, 2011.
  36. Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B. C. Y., and Agarwal, R., “Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1342-1363, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0416
  37. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H., Psychometric Theory, (3rd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  38. Segars, A. and Grover, V. "Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 517-525, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/249590
  39. Barclay, D., Thompson, R., and Higgins, C., “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration,” Technology Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 285-324, 1995.
  40. Chin, W. W., "The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling," in G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295-336, 1998.
  41. Gray, P. H. and Meister, D. B., “Knowledge Sourcing Effectiveness,” Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 821-834, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192
  42. Petter, S., Straub, D., and Rai, A., “Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 623-656, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148814
  43. Stevens, J., Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
  44. Cohen, J. O., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
  45. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., and Lauro, C., “PLS Path Modeling,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 159-205, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  46. Awad, N. F. and Krishnan, M. S., “The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 13-28, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715
  47. Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B. C. Y., and Agarwal, R., “The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Service,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 135-173, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260305

Cited by

  1. Call for an Open Discussion on Empirical Viability of Causal Indicators vol.22, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.6.071
  2. A Study on the Effect of Personalization-Privacy-Transparency on User Trust in the Recommender System: Base on Social Media’s Videos Recommendation vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.1.173
  3. Privacy-deprived e-commerce: the efficacy of consumer privacy policies on China's e-commerce websites from a legal perspective vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-03-2019-0117
  4. 프라이버시 우려가 모바일 간편결제 서비스 이용에 미치는 영향: 소비자 혁신성의 다차원적 조절효과를 중심으로 vol.28, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.22693/niaip.2021.28.1.022